Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

Open Access 28-09-2024 | Knee Arthroplasty

Evaluation of a radiological grading system for the early detection of total knee arthroplasties at risk for revision surgery

Authors: Nina Hörlesberger, Maria Anna Smolle, Lukas Leitner, Viktor Labmayr, Andreas Leithner, Patrick Sadoghi

Published in: Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery | Issue 11/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

X-rays are regularly performed after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA). While soft tissue management and ligament tension cannot be evaluated, important information, such as inadequate component positioning and loose cement location, as well as subsequent loosening, can be detected. The aim of this study was to correlate radiological findings, referring to the radiological grading system (previously published by the same study group, henceforth abbreviated as “RGS”), with long-term outcomes and implant survival.

Materials and methods

A total of 266 patients who underwent titanium-coated TKA were included. In addition to implant survival, visual analogue scale score, Tegner activity score, knee society score (KSS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, and short form-12 score as well as range of motion were evaluated. Clinical examination as well as anterior-posterior, lateral, full-length weight bearing, and patellar view radiographs were performed pre- and postoperatively, at the 3-, 6-, and 12-month postoperative follow-ups and at the final follow-up. The radiological grading system was evaluated and correlated with long-term outcome and survivorship.

Results

The revision-free survival rate was 88.4% at a median follow-up of 9.8 years (IQR: 9.3–10.3 years; range: 0.1–11.8 years). Revision surgery was required in 31 TKAs (11.7%). The multivariate Cox regression model showed a significant association between an RGS score ≥ 3 deviation points (DP) and an increased risk for revision (hazard ratio: 2.092; 95% CI: 1.020–4.290; p = 0.044). Moreover, the KSS for pain was significantly worse in patients with a RGS score ≥ 3 DP (median, 85 [74–92] vs. 90 [80–94]; p = 0.007).

Conclusions

This is the first study indicating that deviation in component positioning, having an inadequate long leg axis, the presence of free cement or residual bony structures on postoperative X-rays significantly correlate with TKA outcome and implant survival. Therefore RGS can be of high predicable value for the survivorship of the prosthesis.

Level of evidence

Level IV – retrospective cohort study.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Teeny SM, York SC, Mesko JW, Rea RE (2003) Long-term follow-up care recommendations after total hip and knee arthroplasty: results of the American Association of hip and knee surgeons’ member survey. J Arthroplasty 18(8):954–962CrossRefPubMed Teeny SM, York SC, Mesko JW, Rea RE (2003) Long-term follow-up care recommendations after total hip and knee arthroplasty: results of the American Association of hip and knee surgeons’ member survey. J Arthroplasty 18(8):954–962CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Hightower CD, Hightower LS, Tatman PJ, Morgan PM, Gioe T, Singh JA (2016) How often is the office visit needed? Predicting total knee arthroplasty revision risk using pain/function scores. BMC Health Serv Res 16(1):429CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Hightower CD, Hightower LS, Tatman PJ, Morgan PM, Gioe T, Singh JA (2016) How often is the office visit needed? Predicting total knee arthroplasty revision risk using pain/function scores. BMC Health Serv Res 16(1):429CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Livshetz I, Sussman BH, Papas V, Mohamed NS, Salem HS, Delanois RE et al (2023) Analyzing the Burden of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States between 2009 and 2016. J Knee Surg 36(2):121–131CrossRefPubMed Livshetz I, Sussman BH, Papas V, Mohamed NS, Salem HS, Delanois RE et al (2023) Analyzing the Burden of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States between 2009 and 2016. J Knee Surg 36(2):121–131CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Delanois RE, Mistry JB, Gwam CU, Mohamed NS, Choksi US, Mont MA (2017) Current Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty 32(9):2663–2668CrossRefPubMed Delanois RE, Mistry JB, Gwam CU, Mohamed NS, Choksi US, Mont MA (2017) Current Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States. J Arthroplasty 32(9):2663–2668CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Schwartz AM, Farley KX, Guild GN, Bradbury TL (2020) Jr. Projections and epidemiology of revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States to 2030. J Arthroplasty 35(6S):S79–S85CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schwartz AM, Farley KX, Guild GN, Bradbury TL (2020) Jr. Projections and epidemiology of revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States to 2030. J Arthroplasty 35(6S):S79–S85CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Mathis DT, Hirschmann MT (2021) Why do knees after total knee arthroplasty fail in different parts of the world? J Orthop 23:52–59CrossRefPubMed Mathis DT, Hirschmann MT (2021) Why do knees after total knee arthroplasty fail in different parts of the world? J Orthop 23:52–59CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Hoerlesberger N, Glehr M, Amerstorfer F, Hauer G, Leithner A, Sadoghi P (2021) Residents’ learning curve of total knee arthroplasty based on Radiological Outcome parameters: a retrospective comparative study. J Arthroplasty 36(1):154–159CrossRefPubMed Hoerlesberger N, Glehr M, Amerstorfer F, Hauer G, Leithner A, Sadoghi P (2021) Residents’ learning curve of total knee arthroplasty based on Radiological Outcome parameters: a retrospective comparative study. J Arthroplasty 36(1):154–159CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Kastner N, Sternbauer S, Friesenbichler J, Vielgut I, Wolf M, Glehr M et al (2014) Impact of the tibial slope on range of motion after low-contact-stress, mobile-bearing, total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 38(2):291–295CrossRefPubMed Kastner N, Sternbauer S, Friesenbichler J, Vielgut I, Wolf M, Glehr M et al (2014) Impact of the tibial slope on range of motion after low-contact-stress, mobile-bearing, total knee arthroplasty. Int Orthop 38(2):291–295CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Longstaff LM, Sloan K, Stamp N, Scaddan M, Beaver R (2009) Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function. J Arthroplasty 24(4):570–578CrossRefPubMed Longstaff LM, Sloan K, Stamp N, Scaddan M, Beaver R (2009) Good alignment after total knee arthroplasty leads to faster rehabilitation and better function. J Arthroplasty 24(4):570–578CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Abdel MP, Ollivier M, Parratte S, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ, Pagnano MW (2018) Effect of postoperative mechanical Axis Alignment on Survival and functional outcomes of modern total knee arthroplasties with cement: a Concise follow-up at 20 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 100(6):472–478CrossRefPubMed Abdel MP, Ollivier M, Parratte S, Trousdale RT, Berry DJ, Pagnano MW (2018) Effect of postoperative mechanical Axis Alignment on Survival and functional outcomes of modern total knee arthroplasties with cement: a Concise follow-up at 20 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 100(6):472–478CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Rand JA, Coventry MB (1988) Ten-year evaluation of geometric total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. (232):168–173 Rand JA, Coventry MB (1988) Ten-year evaluation of geometric total knee arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. (232):168–173
14.
go back to reference Hoenig J, Heisey D (2001) The abuse of power: the Pervasive Fallacy of Power Calculations for Data Analysis. Am Stat 55:19–24CrossRef Hoenig J, Heisey D (2001) The abuse of power: the Pervasive Fallacy of Power Calculations for Data Analysis. Am Stat 55:19–24CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Sadoghi P, Liebensteiner M, Agreiter M, Leithner A, Bohler N, Labek G (2013) Revision surgery after total joint arthroplasty: a complication-based analysis using worldwide arthroplasty registers. J Arthroplasty 28(8):1329–1332CrossRefPubMed Sadoghi P, Liebensteiner M, Agreiter M, Leithner A, Bohler N, Labek G (2013) Revision surgery after total joint arthroplasty: a complication-based analysis using worldwide arthroplasty registers. J Arthroplasty 28(8):1329–1332CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Lee BS, Cho HI, Bin SI, Kim JM, Jo BK (2018) Femoral component Varus Malposition is Associated with tibial aseptic loosening after TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 476(2):400–407CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Lee BS, Cho HI, Bin SI, Kim JM, Jo BK (2018) Femoral component Varus Malposition is Associated with tibial aseptic loosening after TKA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 476(2):400–407CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Ritter MA, Davis KE, Davis P, Farris A, Malinzak RA, Berend ME et al (2013) Preoperative malalignment increases risk of failure after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(2):126–131CrossRefPubMed Ritter MA, Davis KE, Davis P, Farris A, Malinzak RA, Berend ME et al (2013) Preoperative malalignment increases risk of failure after total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(2):126–131CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Ritter MA, Davis KE, Meding JB, Pierson JL, Berend ME, Malinzak RA (2011) The effect of alignment and BMI on failure of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(17):1588–1596CrossRefPubMed Ritter MA, Davis KE, Meding JB, Pierson JL, Berend ME, Malinzak RA (2011) The effect of alignment and BMI on failure of total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(17):1588–1596CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS, Park SD (2014) The relationship between the survival of total knee arthroplasty and postoperative coronal, sagittal and rotational alignment of knee prosthesis. Int Orthop 38(2):379–385CrossRefPubMed Kim YH, Park JW, Kim JS, Park SD (2014) The relationship between the survival of total knee arthroplasty and postoperative coronal, sagittal and rotational alignment of knee prosthesis. Int Orthop 38(2):379–385CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Howell SM, Shelton TJ, Hull ML (2018) Implant survival and function ten years after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 33(12):3678–3684CrossRefPubMed Howell SM, Shelton TJ, Hull ML (2018) Implant survival and function ten years after kinematically aligned total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 33(12):3678–3684CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Hauptmann SM, Weber P, Glaser C, Birkenmaier C, Jansson V, Muller PE (2008) Free bone cement fragments after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an underappreciated problem. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16(8):770–775CrossRefPubMed Hauptmann SM, Weber P, Glaser C, Birkenmaier C, Jansson V, Muller PE (2008) Free bone cement fragments after minimally invasive unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: an underappreciated problem. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16(8):770–775CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Awengen R, Rasch H, Amsler F, Hirschmann MT (2016) Symptomatic versus asymptomatic knees after bilateral total knee arthroplasty: what is the difference in SPECT/CT? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 43(4):762–772CrossRefPubMed Awengen R, Rasch H, Amsler F, Hirschmann MT (2016) Symptomatic versus asymptomatic knees after bilateral total knee arthroplasty: what is the difference in SPECT/CT? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 43(4):762–772CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Mathis DT, Tschudi S, Amsler F, Hauser A, Rasch H, Hirschmann MT (2022) Correlations of typical pain patterns with SPECT/CT findings in unhappy patients after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30(9):3007–3023CrossRefPubMed Mathis DT, Tschudi S, Amsler F, Hauser A, Rasch H, Hirschmann MT (2022) Correlations of typical pain patterns with SPECT/CT findings in unhappy patients after total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30(9):3007–3023CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Song SJ, Detch RC, Maloney WJ, Goodman SB, Huddleston JI (2014) 3rd. Causes of instability after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 29(2):360–364CrossRefPubMed Song SJ, Detch RC, Maloney WJ, Goodman SB, Huddleston JI (2014) 3rd. Causes of instability after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 29(2):360–364CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Grimberg AW, Grupp TM, Elliott J, Melsheimer O, Jansson V, Steinbruck A (2021) Ceramic coating in cemented primary total knee arthroplasty is not Associated with decreased risk of revision due to early prosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty 36(3):991–997CrossRefPubMed Grimberg AW, Grupp TM, Elliott J, Melsheimer O, Jansson V, Steinbruck A (2021) Ceramic coating in cemented primary total knee arthroplasty is not Associated with decreased risk of revision due to early prosthetic joint infection. J Arthroplasty 36(3):991–997CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Sambandam S, Mounasamy V, Wukich D (2022) Patients undergoing manipulation after total knee arthroplasty are at higher risk of revision within 2 years. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 32(1):145–150CrossRefPubMed Sambandam S, Mounasamy V, Wukich D (2022) Patients undergoing manipulation after total knee arthroplasty are at higher risk of revision within 2 years. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 32(1):145–150CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Utzschneider S, Harrasser N, Sadoghi P, Weber P, Schroder C, Pietschmann MF et al (2010) Crosslinked polyethylene in knee arthroplasty: a simulator study evaluating the positive influence on the tribocontact area in the fixed-bearing knee. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130(11):1419–1424CrossRefPubMed Utzschneider S, Harrasser N, Sadoghi P, Weber P, Schroder C, Pietschmann MF et al (2010) Crosslinked polyethylene in knee arthroplasty: a simulator study evaluating the positive influence on the tribocontact area in the fixed-bearing knee. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130(11):1419–1424CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Evaluation of a radiological grading system for the early detection of total knee arthroplasties at risk for revision surgery
Authors
Nina Hörlesberger
Maria Anna Smolle
Lukas Leitner
Viktor Labmayr
Andreas Leithner
Patrick Sadoghi
Publication date
28-09-2024
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery / Issue 11/2024
Print ISSN: 0936-8051
Electronic ISSN: 1434-3916
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-024-05572-3