Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China based on real-world studies

Although pembrolizumab has been shown to be effective, its high price has prevented it from being widely used. Especially in the real world, the application situation is still uncertain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab on the basis of real-world studies, from the perspective of the health care system.

Pembrolizumab significantly improved median PFS in patients (15.5 months vs. 8.8 months). The median OS in the Pembrolizumab group has not been reached, while it was 26.2 months in the chemotherapy group. When the drug donation program is not considered, the ICER of pembrolizumab is $146,409.07/QALY. Regardless of whether the willingness-to-pay threshold is set at three times the per capita GDP of China ($36,070.2) or three times the per capita GDP of Guangdong Province ($64,523.8), the use of pembrolizumab is not cost-effective. However, after considering the drug donation program, the ICER decreased to $56,127.74/QALY. Under the willingness-to-pay threshold of three times the per capita GDP of Guangzhou in 2022 ($64,523.8), pembrolizumab became a cost-effective choice.

In the treatment of advanced NSCLC in China, pembrolizumab, particularly when considering the drug donation program, offers better survival outcomes and becomes cost-effective. This highlights the importance of such programs in making high-cost treatments accessible in real-world clinical settings.