Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2024 | COVID-19 | Case Report

Outstretching challenges for rehabilitation of a mucormycotic case-a digitally designed patient-specific implant approach in the recent era

Authors: Ankita Pathak, Mithilesh Dhamande, Bhushan Mundada, Anjali Bhoyar, Seema Sathe, Smruti Gujjelwar, Shubham Tawade, Aashish Gupta, Prasanna Sonar

Published in: BMC Oral Health | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Reconstruction of maxillofacial defects is challenging due to the region’s complex anatomy. During the COVID-19 era, many patients lost their maxilla and chewing efficiency as a result of Mucormycosis. In such cases, custom-designed implants offer a graftless solution for seemingly hopeless situations. This case report aims at miraculous dental transformation utilizing the Patient Specific Implant (PSI) approach.

Case Presentation

A 64-year-old male patient presented to the Prosthodontics Department with the chief complaint of missing teeth. He had been struggling with chewing for two years due to a post-mucormycotic maxillary jaw. A CT scan was obtained to evaluate and investigate the affected site. After a comprehensive diagnosis, the treatment of choice was a patient-specific implant decided using 3D printing technology. Reconstructing maxillofacial defects poses significant challenges due to the region’s intricate anatomy, as well as its aesthetic and functional implications. The use of pre-formed alloplastic implants and autogenous grafts often leads to complications such as resorption, infection, and displacement. However, recent technological advances have made it possible to fabricate customized patient-specific implants (PSIs) through computer modeling, offering new opportunities for reconstructive surgery.

Conclusion

This case report demonstrates the dental management of post-mucormycotic patients with specially designed implants, customized according to the availability and anatomy of the bone in the entire head region. The absence of complications during follow-up, conducted at 15, 30, 45, and 90 days, and subsequently monthly for two years, highlights the success of this approach. Evaluation parameters included infection, soft tissue recovery, wound separation, masticatory efficiency, stability of the prosthesis, and aesthetic outcomes. The positive outcomes observed at follow-up appointments emphasize the viability and effectiveness of patient-specific implants in addressing maxillary defects caused by post-mucormycosis.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Patel N, Mel A, Patel P, Fakkhruddin A, Gupta S. A Novel Method to Rehabilitate Post-mucormycosis Maxillectomy Defect by Using Patient-Specific Zygoma Implant. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2023;22(Suppl 1):118–123. doi: 10.1007/s12663-023-01847-1. Epub 2023 Feb 3. PMID: 36776348; PMCID: PMC9897146. CLINICAL PVolume 22, pages 118–123, (2023). Patel N, Mel A, Patel P, Fakkhruddin A, Gupta S. A Novel Method to Rehabilitate Post-mucormycosis Maxillectomy Defect by Using Patient-Specific Zygoma Implant. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2023;22(Suppl 1):118–123. doi: 10.1007/s12663-023-01847-1. Epub 2023 Feb 3. PMID: 36776348; PMCID: PMC9897146. CLINICAL PVolume 22, pages 118–123, (2023).
2.
go back to reference Patient-Specific Implants in. Maxillofacial Reconstruction - A Case Report Joshi, Samir; Salema, Hamza Javed; Pawar, Sudhir; Nair, Vivek Sunil; Koranne, Vaishali1; Sane, Vikrant Dilip. Patient-Specific Implants in. Maxillofacial Reconstruction - A Case Report Joshi, Samir; Salema, Hamza Javed; Pawar, Sudhir; Nair, Vivek Sunil; Koranne, Vaishali1; Sane, Vikrant Dilip.
3.
go back to reference Pachisia SK, Ganguli A, Sahu S, Maity C, Ghosh A, Sen S. Patient-specific implants (psi) in maxillary hypoplasia secondary to cleft lip and palate deformity. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2021;20:581–5.CrossRefPubMed Pachisia SK, Ganguli A, Sahu S, Maity C, Ghosh A, Sen S. Patient-specific implants (psi) in maxillary hypoplasia secondary to cleft lip and palate deformity. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2021;20:581–5.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Järvinen S, Suojanen J, Kormi E, Wilkman T, Kiukkonen A, Leikola J, et al. The use of patient-specific polyetheretherketone implants for reconstruction of maxillofacial deformities. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019;47:1072–6.CrossRefPubMed Järvinen S, Suojanen J, Kormi E, Wilkman T, Kiukkonen A, Leikola J, et al. The use of patient-specific polyetheretherketone implants for reconstruction of maxillofacial deformities. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2019;47:1072–6.CrossRefPubMed
5.
6.
go back to reference Chamo D, Msallem B, Sharma N, Aghlmandi S, Kunz C, Thieringer FM. Accuracy assessment of molded, patient-specific polymethylmethacrylate craniofacial implants compared to their 3D printed originals. J Clin Med. 2020;9:832.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chamo D, Msallem B, Sharma N, Aghlmandi S, Kunz C, Thieringer FM. Accuracy assessment of molded, patient-specific polymethylmethacrylate craniofacial implants compared to their 3D printed originals. J Clin Med. 2020;9:832.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Nandavar A, Shah A, Nair S, Kumar B. Rehabilitation of maxillectomy patients using quad zygomatic implants—a case series. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;48:44.CrossRef Nandavar A, Shah A, Nair S, Kumar B. Rehabilitation of maxillectomy patients using quad zygomatic implants—a case series. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;48:44.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Cerea M, Dolcini GA. Custom-made direct metal laser sintering titanium subperiosteal implants: a retrospective clinical study on 70 patients. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:1–11.CrossRef Cerea M, Dolcini GA. Custom-made direct metal laser sintering titanium subperiosteal implants: a retrospective clinical study on 70 patients. Biomed Res Int. 2018;2018:1–11.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Vosselman N, Merema BJ, Schepman KP, Raghoebar GM. Patient-specific sub-periosteal zygoma implant for prosthetic rehabilitation of large maxillary defects after oncological resection. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;48:115–7.CrossRefPubMed Vosselman N, Merema BJ, Schepman KP, Raghoebar GM. Patient-specific sub-periosteal zygoma implant for prosthetic rehabilitation of large maxillary defects after oncological resection. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;48:115–7.CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Gellrich NC, Zimmerer RM, Spalthoff S, Jehn P, Pott PC, Rana M, Rahlf B. A customized digitally engineered solution for fixed dental rehabilitation in severe bone deficiency: a new innovative line extension in implant dentistry. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017;45(10):1632–8.CrossRefPubMed Gellrich NC, Zimmerer RM, Spalthoff S, Jehn P, Pott PC, Rana M, Rahlf B. A customized digitally engineered solution for fixed dental rehabilitation in severe bone deficiency: a new innovative line extension in implant dentistry. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2017;45(10):1632–8.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Mommaerts MY. Evolutionary steps in designing and biofunctionalization the additively manufactured sub-periosteal jaw implant ‘AMSJI’ for the maxilla. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;48:108–14.CrossRefPubMed Mommaerts MY. Evolutionary steps in designing and biofunctionalization the additively manufactured sub-periosteal jaw implant ‘AMSJI’ for the maxilla. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2019;48:108–14.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Schou S, Pallesen L, Hjørting-Hansen E, Pedersen CS, Fibaek B. A 41-year history of a mandibular subperiosteal implant. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11:171–8.PubMed Schou S, Pallesen L, Hjørting-Hansen E, Pedersen CS, Fibaek B. A 41-year history of a mandibular subperiosteal implant. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2000;11:171–8.PubMed
13.
go back to reference Chigurupati R, Aloor N, Salas R, Schmidt BL. Quality of life after maxillectomy and prosthetic obturator rehabilitation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;71:1471–83.CrossRefPubMed Chigurupati R, Aloor N, Salas R, Schmidt BL. Quality of life after maxillectomy and prosthetic obturator rehabilitation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2013;71:1471–83.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Mommaerts MY. Additively manufactured sub-periosteal jaw implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;7:938–40.CrossRef Mommaerts MY. Additively manufactured sub-periosteal jaw implants. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;7:938–40.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Kornblith AB, Zlotolow IM, Gooen J, Huryn JM, Lerner T, Strong EW, Shah JP, Spiro RH, Holland JC. Quality of life of maxillectomy patients using an obturator prosthesis. Head Neck. 1996;18:323–34.CrossRefPubMed Kornblith AB, Zlotolow IM, Gooen J, Huryn JM, Lerner T, Strong EW, Shah JP, Spiro RH, Holland JC. Quality of life of maxillectomy patients using an obturator prosthesis. Head Neck. 1996;18:323–34.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Malevez C, Abarca F, Durdu F, Daelemans P. Clinical outcome of 103 consecutive zygomaticus implants: a 6–8 months follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:18–22.CrossRefPubMed Malevez C, Abarca F, Durdu F, Daelemans P. Clinical outcome of 103 consecutive zygomaticus implants: a 6–8 months follow-up study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2004;15:18–22.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Neyt L, De Clercq CA, Abeloos JV, Mommaerts MY. Reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla with a combination of sinus augmentation, onlay bone grafting, and implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;55:1397–401.CrossRefPubMed Neyt L, De Clercq CA, Abeloos JV, Mommaerts MY. Reconstruction of the severely resorbed maxilla with a combination of sinus augmentation, onlay bone grafting, and implants. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1997;55:1397–401.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Outstretching challenges for rehabilitation of a mucormycotic case-a digitally designed patient-specific implant approach in the recent era
Authors
Ankita Pathak
Mithilesh Dhamande
Bhushan Mundada
Anjali Bhoyar
Seema Sathe
Smruti Gujjelwar
Shubham Tawade
Aashish Gupta
Prasanna Sonar
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keywords
COVID-19
Incision
Published in
BMC Oral Health / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6831
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-05099-4