Skip to main content
Top
Published in: Clinical Drug Investigation 10/2023

22-09-2023 | COVID-19 | Original Research Article

Effectiveness and Safety of Remdesivir in Treating Hospitalised Patients with COVID-19: A Propensity Score Analysis of Real-Life Data from a Monocentric Observational Study in Times of Health Emergency

Authors: Nicola Ughi, Davide Paolo Bernasconi, Francesca Del Gaudio, Armanda Dicuonzo, Alessandro Maloberti, Cristina Giannattasio, Paolo Tarsia, Giovanna Travi, Francesco Scaglione, Fabrizio Colombo, Michaela Bertuzzi, Antonella Adinolfi, Maria Grazia Valsecchi, Claudio Rossetti, Oscar Massimiliano Epis, The Niguarda COVID Working Group

Published in: Clinical Drug Investigation | Issue 10/2023

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and Objectives

Remdesivir is an antiviral agent, which was shown to be safe and effective in treating early COVID-19, but its favourable impact in hospitalised patients with non-critical disease is still under investigation. The present study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of remdesivir as a treatment for hospitalised patients with COVID-19 by a propensity score analysis of observational data.

Methods

In this monocentric retrospective cohort study, the effectiveness and safety of a 5-day course of remdesivir (200 mg intravenously at Day 1, then 100 mg from Days 2–5) in association with the standard of care were assessed in comparison with the standard of care only. The primary endpoint was the proportion of recovery on Day 14.

Results

Of 3662 eligible inpatients who tested positive for the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 genome by nasopharyngeal swab at admission, 861 (24%) non-critical patients were included in a propensity score analysis and 281 (33%) were exposed to remdesivir. In total, 242/281 (86.1%) and 435/580 (75.0%) patients recovered in exposed and non-exposed, respectively, with a relative improvement of 11.1% (95% CI + 5.8 to 16.5%; unadjusted odds ratio: 2.07, 95% CI 1.40–3.05, p = 0.0001; after adjustment by propensity score weighting, odds ratio: 1.92, 95% CI 1.30–2.83, p = 0.001). In treated patients, 1 (0.03%) anaphylactic reaction and 1 (0.03%) acute reaction during drug injection were reported, and 24 (8.5%) patients stopped the treatment due to adverse reactions. No significant differences were found with respect to the secondary efficacy endpoints (in-hospital all-cause death, need for intensive care treatments, clinical improvement score at Day 28) and safety endpoints (any and serious adverse reactions).

Conclusion

A 5-day course of remdesivir in association with the standard of care effectively promoted recovery from COVID-19 among non-critical in-hospital patients and had an acceptable safety profile.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sharma A, Ahmad Farouk I, Lal SK. COVID-19: a review on the novel coronavirus disease evolution, transmission, detection, control and prevention. Viruses. 2021;13(2):202. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sharma A, Ahmad Farouk I, Lal SK. COVID-19: a review on the novel coronavirus disease evolution, transmission, detection, control and prevention. Viruses. 2021;13(2):202. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Heil EL, Kottilil S. The Goldilocks time for remdesivir—is any indication just right? N Engl J Med. 2022;386(4):385–7. CrossRefPubMed Heil EL, Kottilil S. The Goldilocks time for remdesivir—is any indication just right? N Engl J Med. 2022;386(4):385–7. CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Austin PC. A comparison of 12 algorithms for matching on the propensity score. Stat Med. 2014;33(6):1057–69. CrossRefPubMed Austin PC. A comparison of 12 algorithms for matching on the propensity score. Stat Med. 2014;33(6):1057–69. CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Austin PC, Stuart EA. Estimating the effect of treatment on binary outcomes using full matching on the propensity score. Stat Methods Med Res. 2017;26(6):2505–25. CrossRefPubMed Austin PC, Stuart EA. Estimating the effect of treatment on binary outcomes using full matching on the propensity score. Stat Methods Med Res. 2017;26(6):2505–25. CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Lunceford JK, Davidian M. Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: a comparative study. Stat Med. 2004;23(19):2937–60. CrossRefPubMed Lunceford JK, Davidian M. Stratification and weighting via the propensity score in estimation of causal treatment effects: a comparative study. Stat Med. 2004;23(19):2937–60. CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Austin PC. A tutorial and case study in propensity score analysis: an application to estimating the effect of in-hospital smoking cessation counseling on mortality. Multivariate Behav Res. 2011;46(1):119–51. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Austin PC. A tutorial and case study in propensity score analysis: an application to estimating the effect of in-hospital smoking cessation counseling on mortality. Multivariate Behav Res. 2011;46(1):119–51. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
go back to reference Austin PC, Stuart EA. Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Stat Med. 2015;34(28):3661–79. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Austin PC, Stuart EA. Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Stat Med. 2015;34(28):3661–79. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Ho DE, Imai K, King G, et al. MatchIt: nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. J Stat Softw. 2011;42(8):1–28. CrossRef Ho DE, Imai K, King G, et al. MatchIt: nonparametric preprocessing for parametric causal inference. J Stat Softw. 2011;42(8):1–28. CrossRef
25.
go back to reference Mahajan L, Singh AP. Gifty. Clinical outcomes of using remdesivir in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19: a prospective randomised study. Indian J Anaesth. 2021;65(Suppl 1):S41–6. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Mahajan L, Singh AP. Gifty. Clinical outcomes of using remdesivir in patients with moderate to severe COVID-19: a prospective randomised study. Indian J Anaesth. 2021;65(Suppl 1):S41–6. CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
33.
go back to reference Chokkalingam A, Li H, Asubonteng J, et al. Comparative effectiveness of remdesivir treatment in patients hospitalized with Covid-19. World Microbe Forum; June 20–24, 2021 (poster WMF 21-2970). Chokkalingam A, Li H, Asubonteng J, et al. Comparative effectiveness of remdesivir treatment in patients hospitalized with Covid-19. World Microbe Forum; June 20–24, 2021 (poster WMF 21-2970).
36.
go back to reference WHO Solidarity Trial Consortium. Remdesivir and three other drugs for hospitalised patients with COVID-19: final results of the WHO Solidarity Randomised Trial and updated meta-analyses. Lancet. 2022;399(10339):1941–53. CrossRefPubMedCentral WHO Solidarity Trial Consortium. Remdesivir and three other drugs for hospitalised patients with COVID-19: final results of the WHO Solidarity Randomised Trial and updated meta-analyses. Lancet. 2022;399(10339):1941–53. CrossRefPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Effectiveness and Safety of Remdesivir in Treating Hospitalised Patients with COVID-19: A Propensity Score Analysis of Real-Life Data from a Monocentric Observational Study in Times of Health Emergency
Authors
Nicola Ughi
Davide Paolo Bernasconi
Francesca Del Gaudio
Armanda Dicuonzo
Alessandro Maloberti
Cristina Giannattasio
Paolo Tarsia
Giovanna Travi
Francesco Scaglione
Fabrizio Colombo
Michaela Bertuzzi
Antonella Adinolfi
Maria Grazia Valsecchi
Claudio Rossetti
Oscar Massimiliano Epis
The Niguarda COVID Working Group
Publication date
22-09-2023
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Keyword
COVID-19
Published in
Clinical Drug Investigation / Issue 10/2023
Print ISSN: 1173-2563
Electronic ISSN: 1179-1918
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40261-023-01304-4

Other articles of this Issue 10/2023

Clinical Drug Investigation 10/2023 Go to the issue