Skip to main content
Top

Open Access 27-09-2024 | Computed Tomography | Original Article

Placing the tibial component of an ankle prosthesis: results of a CT-based simulation in healthy adults

Authors: Patrick Gahr, Josephine Wittmüß, Heiner Martin, Thomas Beyer, Dagmar-C. Fischer, Thomas Mittlmeier

Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To characterize the 3D geometry of the distal tibia resection area from healthy individuals using CT-based digital implantation for proper preoperative sizing of TAA tibia component placement.

Methods

Standardized CT images of healthy ankle joints serving as intra-individual references for treatment of contralateral injuries were identified. The tibial cross section dedicated to virtually host the tibial component was digitally prepared, and the size of the virtual contact surface was calculated. Finally, out of five prototypes the one fitting best in terms of size and alignment was identified.

Results

CT scans taken from 319 subjects were used for the virtual implantation procedure. Body height and size of the distal tibia contact area correlated (r = 0.49 and 0.42 in females and males, each p < 0.001). Prosthesis sizes 2 and 3 fit well for the vast majority of patients, while the smallest and largest sizes are rarely required.

Conclusions

Digital implantation of the tibial component should be considered a valuable tool for preoperative planning as well as for the development of new implant types.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Terrell RD, Montgomery SR, Pannell WC, Sandlin MI, Inoue H, Wang JC, SooHoo NF (2013) Comparison of practice patterns in total ankle replacement and ankle fusion in the United States. Foot Ankle Int 34(11):1486–1492CrossRefPubMed Terrell RD, Montgomery SR, Pannell WC, Sandlin MI, Inoue H, Wang JC, SooHoo NF (2013) Comparison of practice patterns in total ankle replacement and ankle fusion in the United States. Foot Ankle Int 34(11):1486–1492CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Haddad SL, Coetzee JC, Estok R, Fahrbach K, Banel D, Nalysnyk L (2007) Intermediate and long-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis. A systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(9):1899–905CrossRefPubMed Haddad SL, Coetzee JC, Estok R, Fahrbach K, Banel D, Nalysnyk L (2007) Intermediate and long-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis. A systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(9):1899–905CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Goldberg AJ, Chowdhury K, Bordea E, Hauptmannova I, Blackstone J, Brooking D et al (2022) Total ankle replacement versus arthrodesis for end-stage ankle osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 175(12):1648–1657CrossRefPubMed Goldberg AJ, Chowdhury K, Bordea E, Hauptmannova I, Blackstone J, Brooking D et al (2022) Total ankle replacement versus arthrodesis for end-stage ankle osteoarthritis: a randomized controlled trial. Ann Intern Med 175(12):1648–1657CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Glazebrook MA, Arsenault K, Dunbar M (2009) Evidence-based classification of complications in total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int 30(10):945–949CrossRefPubMed Glazebrook MA, Arsenault K, Dunbar M (2009) Evidence-based classification of complications in total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int 30(10):945–949CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Hintermann B, Susdorf R, Krahenbuhl N, Ruiz R (2020) Axial rotational alignment in mobile-bearing total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int 41(5):521–528CrossRefPubMed Hintermann B, Susdorf R, Krahenbuhl N, Ruiz R (2020) Axial rotational alignment in mobile-bearing total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int 41(5):521–528CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Mittlmeier T (2013) Arthrodesis versus total joint replacement of the ankle. Unfallchirurg 116(6):537–50CrossRefPubMed Mittlmeier T (2013) Arthrodesis versus total joint replacement of the ankle. Unfallchirurg 116(6):537–50CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Cody EA, Bejarano-Pineda L, Lachman JR, Taylor MA, Gausden EB, DeOrio JK, Easley ME, Nunley JA 2nd (2019) Risk factors for failure of total ankle arthroplasty with a minimum five years of follow-up. Foot Ankle Int 40(3):249–258CrossRefPubMed Cody EA, Bejarano-Pineda L, Lachman JR, Taylor MA, Gausden EB, DeOrio JK, Easley ME, Nunley JA 2nd (2019) Risk factors for failure of total ankle arthroplasty with a minimum five years of follow-up. Foot Ankle Int 40(3):249–258CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Cenni F, Leardini A, Cheli A, Catani F, Belvedere C, Romagnoli M, Giannini S (2012) Position of the prosthesis components in total ankle replacement and the effect on motion at the replaced joint. Int Orthop 36(3):571–578CrossRefPubMed Cenni F, Leardini A, Cheli A, Catani F, Belvedere C, Romagnoli M, Giannini S (2012) Position of the prosthesis components in total ankle replacement and the effect on motion at the replaced joint. Int Orthop 36(3):571–578CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Najefi AA, Ghani Y, Goldberg A (2019) Role of rotation in total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int 40(12):1358–1367CrossRefPubMed Najefi AA, Ghani Y, Goldberg A (2019) Role of rotation in total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Int 40(12):1358–1367CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Saito GH, Sturnick DR, Ellis SJ, Deland JT, Demetracopoulos CA (2019) Influence of tibial component position on altered kinematics following total ankle arthroplasty during simulated gait. Foot Ankle Int 40(8):873–879CrossRefPubMed Saito GH, Sturnick DR, Ellis SJ, Deland JT, Demetracopoulos CA (2019) Influence of tibial component position on altered kinematics following total ankle arthroplasty during simulated gait. Foot Ankle Int 40(8):873–879CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Townshend D, Bing A, Blundell C, Clough T, Davenport J, Davies H, Davis J, Dhar S, Hepple S, Kakwani R, Karski M, Makwana N, McKinley J, Murty A, Raglan M, Shalaby H, Sharpe I, Smith R, Taylor H, Goldberg A (2023) Two to five-year outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty with the infinity fixed-bearing implant: a concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 105(23):1846–1856CrossRefPubMed Townshend D, Bing A, Blundell C, Clough T, Davenport J, Davies H, Davis J, Dhar S, Hepple S, Kakwani R, Karski M, Makwana N, McKinley J, Murty A, Raglan M, Shalaby H, Sharpe I, Smith R, Taylor H, Goldberg A (2023) Two to five-year outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty with the infinity fixed-bearing implant: a concise follow-up of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am 105(23):1846–1856CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Thompson MJ, Consul D, Umbel BD, Berlet GC (2021) Accuracy of weightbearing CT scans for patient-specific instrumentation in total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Orthop 6(4):24730114211061492CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Thompson MJ, Consul D, Umbel BD, Berlet GC (2021) Accuracy of weightbearing CT scans for patient-specific instrumentation in total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Orthop 6(4):24730114211061492CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Hintermann B, Pitner M-T, Grabmayr S, Hintermann B (2005) Endoprothetik des Sprunggelenks : historischer Überblick, aktuelle Therapiekonzepte und Entwicklungen Wien etc. SpringerCrossRef Hintermann B, Pitner M-T, Grabmayr S, Hintermann B (2005) Endoprothetik des Sprunggelenks : historischer Überblick, aktuelle Therapiekonzepte und Entwicklungen Wien etc. SpringerCrossRef
14.
go back to reference Penner M, Davis WH, Wing K, Bemenderfer T, Waly F, Anderson RB (2019) The infinity total ankle system: early clinical results with 2- to 4-year follow-up. Foot Ankle Spec 12(2):159–166CrossRefPubMed Penner M, Davis WH, Wing K, Bemenderfer T, Waly F, Anderson RB (2019) The infinity total ankle system: early clinical results with 2- to 4-year follow-up. Foot Ankle Spec 12(2):159–166CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Placing the tibial component of an ankle prosthesis: results of a CT-based simulation in healthy adults
Authors
Patrick Gahr
Josephine Wittmüß
Heiner Martin
Thomas Beyer
Dagmar-C. Fischer
Thomas Mittlmeier
Publication date
27-09-2024
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-024-04112-4