Advertisement
11-04-2025 | Computed Tomography | Review Article
Comparative diagnostic performance of [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT and [18 F]FDGPET/CT in biliary tract cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Authors: Ahmed Msherghi, Maram Abuajamieh, Moad Ekreer, Muhab Alzlitni, Mohamed Hajalamin, Ebtesam Aldieb, Dua Rajab Khalleefah, Abdussalam I. A. Alzein, Imane Chenfouh, Hudi Mohammed, Abdulmhoimen Elkhadar, Ahmed Benghatnsh, Hamza Adel Salim, Mohamed Alsharedi, Muhammed Elhadi, Max Wintermark, Abass Alavi
Published in: European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging
Login to get accessAbstract
Background
Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) are aggressive malignancies with poor prognosis due to late-stage diagnosis. While [18 F]-FDG PET/CT is widely used for detection and staging, its sensitivity for certain BTC subtypes is limited, prompting the evaluation of 68 Ga-FAPI PET/CT as a promising alternative.
Objective
To compare the diagnostic performance of [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT and [18 F]FDG PET/CT in detecting BTCs, including primary tumors, lymph node involvement, and distant metastases.
Methods
We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library until March 2024 to identify studies that directly compared [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI and [18 F]FDG PET/CT in detecting BTCs. Sensitivity, specificity, pooled mean differences of tumor SUVmax and TBRmax, and odds ratios for detecting primary tumors, lymph nodes, and distant metastases using a random-effects model with the corresponding 95% confidence intervals were evaluated. Subgroup analyses were performed for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC).
Results
The pooled OR for [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT versus [18 F]FDG PET/CT was 4.87 (95% CI: 1.75–13.56, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.60), indicating a statistically significant preference for [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI. In the IHCC subgroup, the pooled OR was 2.98 (95% CI: 0.86–10.38, I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.63) favors [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI. Furthermore, [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI demonstrated significantly higher tumor uptake compared to [18 F]FDG PET/CT, with pooled mean differences in SUVmax of 6.47 (95% CI: 1.81–11.13) and TBRmax of 9.45 (95% CI: 3.88–15.03) across BTCs. Subgroup analysis for IHCC showed a trend favoring [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI, though the TBRmax difference did not reach statistical significance (mean difference: 7.71, 95% CI: - 0.58–16.01). For lymph node metastasis detection, [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI outperformed [18 F]FDG with an odds ratio of 2.81 (95% CI: 1.07–7.35), and for distant metastases, the odds ratio was 3.45 (95% CI: 1.12–10.63). However, moderate variability was observed across the studies for lymph nodes and organ metastases (I2 = 46.9 and 52.4%, respectively).
Conclusion
[68 Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT offers superior diagnostic performance and tumor uptake compared to [18 F]FDG PET/CT in BTCs, particularly for lymph nodes and distant metastasis detection. These findings support the potential clinical utility of [68 Ga]Ga-FAPI PET/CT as a preferred imaging modality in BTCs, though further research is needed to standardize protocols and confirm these results in larger cohorts.