Skip to main content
Top

Open Access 07-06-2025 | Computed Tomography | Review

A meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography for endoleak detection after endovascular aneurysm repair

Authors: Cynthia Xin Wen, Shivshankar Thanigaimani, Sonja Brennan, Joseph Moxon, Jonathan Golledge

Published in: European Radiology

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Patients who have undergone endovascular repair of an abdominal or thoracic aortic aneurysm (EVAR or TEVAR) are recommended to undergo lifelong imaging surveillance to detect endoleaks. Gold standard imaging is by triphasic single energy computed tomography (SECT), however, dual-energy CT (DECT) can reduce radiation exposure by reducing the number of scan phases required. The accuracy of DECT in detecting endoleaks is uncertain. This review assessed the diagnostic accuracy of DECT for detecting endoleaks and compared radiation exposure to conventional triphasic SECT.

Methods and results

Observational studies from Scopus and PubMed databases were screened up to 12th June 2024. Ten studies reporting the diagnostic accuracy of patients previously treated by EVAR or TEVAR were included. According to the quality assessment tool for diagnostic accuracy studies (QUADAS-2), all included studies were considered to have a high risk of bias. A meta-analysis of these studies involving 803 scans on 744 patients found that the pooled sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) of the DECT as compared to the triphasic SECT were 94.0% (95% CI: 88.9%, 96.9%), 98.9% (95% CI: 95.7%, 99.7%), and 266.4 (95% CI: 140.9, 503.8), respectively. A radiation dose reduction by 29–62% was achieved with DECT as compared to the triphasic SECT.

Conclusions

This meta-analysis suggests that DECT has similar diagnostic accuracy to triphasic SECT for diagnosing endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair. This suggests that DECT could be adopted in clinical practice because of the lower radiation dose as compared to the conventional triphasic SECT.

Key Points

Question What is the accuracy of dual energy (DE) as compared to triphasic single energy (SE) computed tomography (CT) for diagnosing endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair?
Findings As compared to triphasic SECT, DECT was accurate in diagnosing endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair and exposed patients to a lower radiation dose.
Clinical relevance The radiation dose associated with lifelong follow-up CT scans after endovascular aneurysm repair has been linked to an increased risk of cancer. This study suggests that the use of DECT can reduce radiation exposure without compromising the accuracy of diagnosing endoleak.

Graphical Abstract

Appendix
This content is only visible if you are logged in and have the appropriate permissions.
Literature
This content is only visible if you are logged in and have the appropriate permissions.
Metadata
Title
A meta-analysis of the diagnostic accuracy of dual-energy computed tomography for endoleak detection after endovascular aneurysm repair
Authors
Cynthia Xin Wen
Shivshankar Thanigaimani
Sonja Brennan
Joseph Moxon
Jonathan Golledge
Publication date
07-06-2025
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Radiology
Print ISSN: 0938-7994
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1084
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-025-11717-8

How can your team use biomarkers to improve management of AD? (Link opens in a new window)

Our experts explore using biomarker tests and interpreting results, establishing a shared decision-making approach with patients and caregivers, and applying biomarker testing to guide treatment strategies.

This content is intended for healthcare professionals outside of the UK.

Supported by:
  • Lilly
Developed by: Springer Health+ IME
Register your interest

How can you integrate PET into your practice? (Link opens in a new window)

1.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™

PET imaging is playing an increasingly critical role in managing AD. Our expert-led program will empower you with practical strategies and real-world case studies to effectively integrate it into clinical practice.

This content is intended for healthcare professionals outside of the UK.

Supported by:
  • Lilly
Developed by: Springer Health+ IME
Register your interest