Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

13-11-2024 | Research Article

Comprehensive image quality comparison of conventional and new flat panel detectors under bedside chest radiography beam conditions

Authors: Sho Maruyama, Hiroki Saitou

Published in: Radiological Physics and Technology | Issue 1/2025

Login to get access

Abstract

Recently, a novel wireless flat-panel detector with auto-exposure control has become available. This study aimed to elucidate the potential advantages of the new detector over conventional detectors through a comprehensive analysis of the physical image quality characteristics. Measurements were conducted on two models: new (720C) and conventional (710C) versions; this assessment was performed by assuming the beam quality for bedside chest radiography, utilizing a portable device for X-ray exposure. The detective quantum efficiency (DQE) was computed based on the presampled modulation transfer function (MTF) and normalized noise power spectrum. The validity of the DQE results was verified through the visualization of the analog blurring components and a detailed analysis of the noise components. The spatial frequency at which the presampled MTF value reached 10% was 5.2 cycles/mm for 720C and 3.9 cycles/mm for 710C. The full width at half-maximum of the spatial spreading of analog components was estimated at 0.09 mm for 720C and 0.14 mm for 710C by the visualization. Regarding the DQE, 720C was superior under low-dose conditions despite no significant differences being observed under high-dose conditions. The new detector demonstrated superior resolution characteristics compared with the conventional detector and an improvement in the DQE under low-dose conditions. However, similar to the conventional detector, a significant dose dependence caused by a structural factor was confirmed for the DQE. These results suggest the existence of an appropriate dose range for maximizing detector performance and provide insights crucial for optimization tasks in the X-ray imaging.
Literature
6.
go back to reference Kim HK, Cunningham IA, Yin Z, Cho G. On the development of digital radiography detectors: A review. Int J Precision Eng Manuf. 2008;9(4):86–100. Kim HK, Cunningham IA, Yin Z, Cho G. On the development of digital radiography detectors: A review. Int J Precision Eng Manuf. 2008;9(4):86–100.
9.
go back to reference Beutal J, Kundel HL, Matter RL. Handbook of medical imaging, volume 1. Physics and psychophysics. Bellingham: SPIE press; 2000. Beutal J, Kundel HL, Matter RL. Handbook of medical imaging, volume 1. Physics and psychophysics. Bellingham: SPIE press; 2000.
16.
go back to reference Hayashi Y. Digital radiography system “CXDI-Elite” with built-in automatic exposure detection function. JIRA Technical Report. 2023;33(1):10–1 (in Japanese). Hayashi Y. Digital radiography system “CXDI-Elite” with built-in automatic exposure detection function. JIRA Technical Report. 2023;33(1):10–1 (in Japanese).
17.
go back to reference International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Medical electrical equipment—Part 2–54: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of X-ray equipment for radiography and radioscopy. IEC 60601–2–54; 2022. International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Medical electrical equipment—Part 2–54: Particular requirements for the basic safety and essential performance of X-ray equipment for radiography and radioscopy. IEC 60601–2–54; 2022.
18.
go back to reference International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Medical diagnostic X-ray equipment—Radiation conditions for use in the determination of characteristics. IEC 61267; 2005. International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Medical diagnostic X-ray equipment—Radiation conditions for use in the determination of characteristics. IEC 61267; 2005.
20.
go back to reference Ichikawa K, Ishida T. Image quality measurement of digital radiography. Tokyo: Ohmsha; 2010. Ichikawa K, Ishida T. Image quality measurement of digital radiography. Tokyo: Ohmsha; 2010.
21.
go back to reference International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Medical electrical equipment—Characteristics of digital X-ray imaging devices—Part 1–1: Determination of the detective quantum efficiency - Detectors used in radiographic imaging. IEC 62220–1–1; 2015. International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Medical electrical equipment—Characteristics of digital X-ray imaging devices—Part 1–1: Determination of the detective quantum efficiency - Detectors used in radiographic imaging. IEC 62220–1–1; 2015.
28.
go back to reference Sakurai N, Takahashi S, Kodama N. Study of profile analysis on the simulated tumor and visibility evaluation in lung area using Bone Suppression Processing. JART. 2017;64:1433–9 (in Japanese). Sakurai N, Takahashi S, Kodama N. Study of profile analysis on the simulated tumor and visibility evaluation in lung area using Bone Suppression Processing. JART. 2017;64:1433–9 (in Japanese).
29.
32.
go back to reference Japan Network for Research and Information on Medical Exposure s(J-RIME). National diagnostic reference levelsin Japan–Japan DRLs 2020–. 2020. Japan Network for Research and Information on Medical Exposure s(J-RIME). National diagnostic reference levelsin Japan–Japan DRLs 2020–. 2020.
34.
go back to reference Seltzer SM, Hubbell JH. Tables and graphs of photon mass attenuation coefficients and mass energy-absorption coefficients for photon energies 1 keV to 20 MeV for elements Z=1 to 92 and some dosimetric materials. Kyoto: Japanese society of radiological technology; 1995. Seltzer SM, Hubbell JH. Tables and graphs of photon mass attenuation coefficients and mass energy-absorption coefficients for photon energies 1 keV to 20 MeV for elements Z=1 to 92 and some dosimetric materials. Kyoto: Japanese society of radiological technology; 1995.
Metadata
Title
Comprehensive image quality comparison of conventional and new flat panel detectors under bedside chest radiography beam conditions
Authors
Sho Maruyama
Hiroki Saitou
Publication date
13-11-2024
Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore
Published in
Radiological Physics and Technology / Issue 1/2025
Print ISSN: 1865-0333
Electronic ISSN: 1865-0341
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12194-024-00859-x