Skip to main content
Top

06-09-2024 | Cochlear Implant | Otology

Patients with Mondini deformty: is standard electrode necessary?

Authors: Ozgur Yigit, Ismail Kaygisiz, Basak Firat, Ozan Ozdemir

Published in: European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study is to compare the results of auditory perception tests and speech sound evaluations with electrode array length in patients with Mondini deformity.

Methods

The study included 14 patients who underwent cochlear implantation and radiologically confirmed Mondini deformity between 2007 and 2021 in our clinic. While 7 patients received standard electrode arrays from the MED-EL brand, the remaining 7 received shortened electrode arrays from the MED-EL brand. Differences in auditory perception, articulation, and speech intelligibility between the two groups were examined. Auditory perception tests were administered to these patients preoperatively and at least 2 years after cochlear implant surgery. The patients’ auditory perception performance was evaluated using single, double, and triple closed-set word tests (MTP-3, MTP-6, MTP-12), two-syllable open-set word test, Glendonald Auditory Screening Procedure (GASP) tests for articulation, Phonemic Synthesis Test (SST) for phonemic knowledge, and Speech Intelligibility Rating (SIR) test for speech intelligibility.

Results

Both groups did not show statistically significant differences in auditory perception tests (MTP-3, MTP-6, MTP-12, two-syllable open-set word test), speech sound tests (SST), and speech intelligibility test (SIR). Significant improvement was observed in all tests in both groups when compared preoperatively and postoperatively.

Conclusion

No significant difference was observed in auditory perception and speech sound tests between groups with short and standard electrode arrays in patients with Mondini deformity. The option of using short electrode arrays during implantation in patients with Mondini deformity can be preferred without doubt in terms of outcomes.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Toh EH, Luxford WM (2008) Cochlear and brainstem implantation. 2002. Neurosurg Clin N Am 19(2):317–329 Toh EH, Luxford WM (2008) Cochlear and brainstem implantation. 2002. Neurosurg Clin N Am 19(2):317–329
2.
go back to reference Rubinstein JT, Parkinson WS, Tyler RS, Gantz BJ (1999) Residual speech recognition and cochlear implant performance: effects of implantation criteria. Am J Otol 20(4):445–452PubMed Rubinstein JT, Parkinson WS, Tyler RS, Gantz BJ (1999) Residual speech recognition and cochlear implant performance: effects of implantation criteria. Am J Otol 20(4):445–452PubMed
3.
go back to reference Friedland DR, Venick HS, Niparko JK (2003) Choice of ear for cochlear implantation: the effect of history and residual hearing on predicted postoperative performance. Otol Neurotol 24(4):582–589CrossRefPubMed Friedland DR, Venick HS, Niparko JK (2003) Choice of ear for cochlear implantation: the effect of history and residual hearing on predicted postoperative performance. Otol Neurotol 24(4):582–589CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Sun JQ, Sun JW, Hou XY (2017) Cochlear implantation in Mondini’s deformity: could the straight electrode array with length of 31 mm be fully inserted? Acta Otolaryngol 137(7):712–715CrossRefPubMed Sun JQ, Sun JW, Hou XY (2017) Cochlear implantation in Mondini’s deformity: could the straight electrode array with length of 31 mm be fully inserted? Acta Otolaryngol 137(7):712–715CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Sennaroglu L (2010) Cochlear implantation in inner ear malformations–a review article. Cochlear Implants Int 11(1):4–41CrossRefPubMed Sennaroglu L (2010) Cochlear implantation in inner ear malformations–a review article. Cochlear Implants Int 11(1):4–41CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Grover M, Sharma S, Bhargava S, Singh SN, Gupta G, Sharma MP (2017) Cochlear implantation in children with anomalous Cochleovestibular anatomy: our experience. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 69(4):504–508CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Grover M, Sharma S, Bhargava S, Singh SN, Gupta G, Sharma MP (2017) Cochlear implantation in children with anomalous Cochleovestibular anatomy: our experience. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 69(4):504–508CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
7.
go back to reference Mondini C (1791) Anatomia Surdi Nati Sectio: De Bononiensi Scientiarum et Artium Institute atque Academia Commentarii. Bononiae 7:419–428 Mondini C (1791) Anatomia Surdi Nati Sectio: De Bononiensi Scientiarum et Artium Institute atque Academia Commentarii. Bononiae 7:419–428
8.
go back to reference Sennaroğlu L, Bajin MD (2017) Classification and current management of inner ear malformations. Balkan Med J 29(5):397–411CrossRef Sennaroğlu L, Bajin MD (2017) Classification and current management of inner ear malformations. Balkan Med J 29(5):397–411CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Mondini Carlo, Hartley GJ, Phelps PD (1997) Minor works of Carlo Mondini: the anatomical section of a boy born Deaf. Am J Otology 18(3):p288–293 Mondini Carlo, Hartley GJ, Phelps PD (1997) Minor works of Carlo Mondini: the anatomical section of a boy born Deaf. Am J Otology 18(3):p288–293
10.
go back to reference Jackler RK, Luxford WM, House WF (1987) Congenital malformations of the inner ear: a classification based on embryogenesis. Laryngoscope 97(3 Pt 2 Suppl 40):2–14PubMed Jackler RK, Luxford WM, House WF (1987) Congenital malformations of the inner ear: a classification based on embryogenesis. Laryngoscope 97(3 Pt 2 Suppl 40):2–14PubMed
11.
go back to reference Qi S, Kong Y, Xu T et al (2019) Speech development in young children with Mondini dysplasia who had undergone cochlear implantation. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 116:118–124CrossRefPubMed Qi S, Kong Y, Xu T et al (2019) Speech development in young children with Mondini dysplasia who had undergone cochlear implantation. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 116:118–124CrossRefPubMed
12.
13.
go back to reference Demir B, Cesur S, Sahin A, Binnetoglu A, Ciprut A, Batman C (2019) Outcomes of cochlear implantation in children with inner ear malformations. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276(9):2397–2403CrossRefPubMed Demir B, Cesur S, Sahin A, Binnetoglu A, Ciprut A, Batman C (2019) Outcomes of cochlear implantation in children with inner ear malformations. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 276(9):2397–2403CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Niu XM, Ping L, Gao RZ, Xia X, Fan XM, Chen Y, Fan Y, Chen XW (2021) Selection of cochlear electrode array implantation lengths and outcomes in patients with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 101(2):108–114PubMed Niu XM, Ping L, Gao RZ, Xia X, Fan XM, Chen Y, Fan Y, Chen XW (2021) Selection of cochlear electrode array implantation lengths and outcomes in patients with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 101(2):108–114PubMed
15.
go back to reference Topbaş S (2006) Türkçe Sesletim-Sesbilgisi Testi: Geçerlik-Güvenirlik ve Standardizasyon Çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi 21(58):39–56 Topbaş S (2006) Türkçe Sesletim-Sesbilgisi Testi: Geçerlik-Güvenirlik ve Standardizasyon Çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi 21(58):39–56
16.
go back to reference Allen C, Nikolopoulos TP, Dyar D, O’Donoghue GM (2001) Reliability of a rating scale for measuring speech intelligibility after pediatric cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 22(5):631–633CrossRefPubMed Allen C, Nikolopoulos TP, Dyar D, O’Donoghue GM (2001) Reliability of a rating scale for measuring speech intelligibility after pediatric cochlear implantation. Otol Neurotol 22(5):631–633CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Miyamoto RT, Osberger MJ, Todd SL et al (1994) Variables affecting implant performance in children. Laryngoscope 104(9):1120–1124CrossRefPubMed Miyamoto RT, Osberger MJ, Todd SL et al (1994) Variables affecting implant performance in children. Laryngoscope 104(9):1120–1124CrossRefPubMed
18.
19.
go back to reference O’Connell BP, Hunter JB, Gifford RH et al (2016) Electrode Location and Audiologic Performance after Cochlear Implantation: a comparative study between Nucleus CI422 and CI512 electrode arrays. Otol Neurotol 37(8):1032–1035CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral O’Connell BP, Hunter JB, Gifford RH et al (2016) Electrode Location and Audiologic Performance after Cochlear Implantation: a comparative study between Nucleus CI422 and CI512 electrode arrays. Otol Neurotol 37(8):1032–1035CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
20.
go back to reference Palomeque Vera JM, Gómez-Hervás J, Fernández-Prada M, Alba-Saida GN, González Ramírez AR, Sainz Quevedo M (2015) Effectiveness of cochlear implant in inner ear bone malformations with anterior labyrinth involvement. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 79(3):369–373CrossRefPubMed Palomeque Vera JM, Gómez-Hervás J, Fernández-Prada M, Alba-Saida GN, González Ramírez AR, Sainz Quevedo M (2015) Effectiveness of cochlear implant in inner ear bone malformations with anterior labyrinth involvement. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 79(3):369–373CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Chen X, Yan F, Liu B et al (2014) The development of auditory skills in young children with Mondini dysplasia after cochlear implantation. PLoS ONE 9(9):e108079CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chen X, Yan F, Liu B et al (2014) The development of auditory skills in young children with Mondini dysplasia after cochlear implantation. PLoS ONE 9(9):e108079CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Pamuk G, Pamuk AE, Akgöz A, Bajin MD, Özgen B, Sennaroğlu L (2021) Radiological measurement of cochlear dimensions in cochlear hypoplasia and its effect on cochlear implant selection. J Laryngol Otol 135(6):501–507CrossRefPubMed Pamuk G, Pamuk AE, Akgöz A, Bajin MD, Özgen B, Sennaroğlu L (2021) Radiological measurement of cochlear dimensions in cochlear hypoplasia and its effect on cochlear implant selection. J Laryngol Otol 135(6):501–507CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Mistrík P, Jolly C (2016) Optimal electrode length to match patient specific cochlear anatomy. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 133(Suppl 1):S68–71CrossRefPubMed Mistrík P, Jolly C (2016) Optimal electrode length to match patient specific cochlear anatomy. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 133(Suppl 1):S68–71CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Cooperman SP, Aaron KA, Fouad A, Tran E, Blevins NH, Fitzgerald MB (2022) Influence of electrode to cochlear duct length ratio on post-operative speech understanding outcomes. Cochlear Implants Int 23(2):59–69CrossRefPubMed Cooperman SP, Aaron KA, Fouad A, Tran E, Blevins NH, Fitzgerald MB (2022) Influence of electrode to cochlear duct length ratio on post-operative speech understanding outcomes. Cochlear Implants Int 23(2):59–69CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Venail F, Mathiolon C, Menjot de Champfleur S et al (2015) Effects of electrode array length on frequency-place mismatch and speech perception with cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol 20(2):102–111CrossRefPubMed Venail F, Mathiolon C, Menjot de Champfleur S et al (2015) Effects of electrode array length on frequency-place mismatch and speech perception with cochlear implants. Audiol Neurootol 20(2):102–111CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Canfarotta MW, Dillon MT, Brown KD, Pillsbury HC, Dedmon MM, O’Connell BP (2022) Insertion depth and Cochlear Implant Speech Recognition outcomes: a comparative study of 28- and 31.5-mm lateral wall arrays. Otol Neurotol 43(2):183–189CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Canfarotta MW, Dillon MT, Brown KD, Pillsbury HC, Dedmon MM, O’Connell BP (2022) Insertion depth and Cochlear Implant Speech Recognition outcomes: a comparative study of 28- and 31.5-mm lateral wall arrays. Otol Neurotol 43(2):183–189CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Hamzavi J, Arnoldner C (2006) Effect of deep insertion of the cochlear implant electrode array on pitch estimation and speech perception. Acta Otolaryngol 126(11):1182–1187CrossRefPubMed Hamzavi J, Arnoldner C (2006) Effect of deep insertion of the cochlear implant electrode array on pitch estimation and speech perception. Acta Otolaryngol 126(11):1182–1187CrossRefPubMed
28.
go back to reference Baumann U, Nobbe A (2004) Pitch ranking with deeply inserted electrode arrays. Ear Hear 25(3):275–283CrossRefPubMed Baumann U, Nobbe A (2004) Pitch ranking with deeply inserted electrode arrays. Ear Hear 25(3):275–283CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Chu KM, Au DK, Hui Y, Chow CK, Wei WI (2005) Short electrode insertion in cochlear implantation: speech perception performance of cantonese-speaking subjects. Acta Otolaryngol 125(7):718–724CrossRefPubMed Chu KM, Au DK, Hui Y, Chow CK, Wei WI (2005) Short electrode insertion in cochlear implantation: speech perception performance of cantonese-speaking subjects. Acta Otolaryngol 125(7):718–724CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Shakrawal N, Sonkhya N, Agarwal S, Grover M (2022) The Effect of Age at Cochlear Implantation on Speech and Auditory performances in Prelingually Deaf Children. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 74(Suppl 1):52–61CrossRefPubMed Shakrawal N, Sonkhya N, Agarwal S, Grover M (2022) The Effect of Age at Cochlear Implantation on Speech and Auditory performances in Prelingually Deaf Children. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 74(Suppl 1):52–61CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Svirsky MA, Chin SB, Jester A (2009) The effects of age at implantation on speech intelligibility in pediatric cochlear implant users: clinical outcomes and sensitive periods. Audiol Med 5(4):293–306CrossRef Svirsky MA, Chin SB, Jester A (2009) The effects of age at implantation on speech intelligibility in pediatric cochlear implant users: clinical outcomes and sensitive periods. Audiol Med 5(4):293–306CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Connor CM, Craig HK, Raudenbush SW, Heavner K, Zwolan TA (2006) The age at which young deaf children receive cochlear implants and their vocabulary and speech-production growth: is there an added value for early implantation? Ear Hear 27(6):628–644CrossRefPubMed Connor CM, Craig HK, Raudenbush SW, Heavner K, Zwolan TA (2006) The age at which young deaf children receive cochlear implants and their vocabulary and speech-production growth: is there an added value for early implantation? Ear Hear 27(6):628–644CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Sevinc S, Ozcebe E, Atas A, Buyukozturk S (2009) Articulation skills in Turkish speaking children with cochlear implant. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 73(10):1430–1433CrossRefPubMed Sevinc S, Ozcebe E, Atas A, Buyukozturk S (2009) Articulation skills in Turkish speaking children with cochlear implant. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 73(10):1430–1433CrossRefPubMed
34.
go back to reference Doubi A, Almuhawas F, Alzhrani F, Doubi M, Aljutaili H, Hagr A (2019) The Effect of Cochlear Coverage on Auditory and Speech Performance in Cochlear Implant patients. Otol Neurotol 40(5):602–607CrossRefPubMed Doubi A, Almuhawas F, Alzhrani F, Doubi M, Aljutaili H, Hagr A (2019) The Effect of Cochlear Coverage on Auditory and Speech Performance in Cochlear Implant patients. Otol Neurotol 40(5):602–607CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Rachovitsas D, Psillas G, Chatzigiannakidou V, Triaridis S, Constantinidis J, Vital V (2012) Speech perception and production in children with inner ear malformations after cochlear implantation. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 76(9):1370–1374CrossRefPubMed Rachovitsas D, Psillas G, Chatzigiannakidou V, Triaridis S, Constantinidis J, Vital V (2012) Speech perception and production in children with inner ear malformations after cochlear implantation. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 76(9):1370–1374CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Patients with Mondini deformty: is standard electrode necessary?
Authors
Ozgur Yigit
Ismail Kaygisiz
Basak Firat
Ozan Ozdemir
Publication date
06-09-2024
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology
Print ISSN: 0937-4477
Electronic ISSN: 1434-4726
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-024-08950-0