Skip to main content
Top

16-05-2024 | Clavicle Fracture | Original Article

Do postoperative outcomes vary between midshaft clavicle fractures of 2, 3, or more than 3 fragments?

Authors: Catalina Larrague, Facundo Miguel Galich, Tomas Martín Tavella, Nicolás Stramazzo, Nicolás Agustín Atala, Luciano Andrés Rossi, Ignacio Tanoira, Maximiliano Ranalletta

Published in: European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

This study aims to assess differences in clinical and surgical outcomes associated with the surgical treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures of different complexities based on fragment number. Additionally, the investigation seeks to present the outcomes of a series of patients who underwent surgery at our institution.

Materials and methods

A retrospective analysis was conducted on the medical records of patients aged over 18 who underwent midshaft clavicle fracture surgery at our center from November 2009 to May 2021. Patients were categorized based on the number of fracture fragments into groups of two, three, or more than three fragments. Consolidation, implant removal, complications, surgical duration, and functional outcomes (assessed through VAS, ASES, and Constant–Murley scale) were evaluated for each specific group and for the overall cohort.

Results

In total, 260 patients were analyzed. There were no significant differences in any of the parameters between the three groups except for surgical time, which was shorter in simple fractures than in those with more than three fragments (68.2 min vs. 75.3 min; p = 0.01). Pseudoarthrosis rate was 2.69%, implant removal rate was 9.61%, and 4.23% of patients presented with complications other than the previous ones. Functional results were excellent, with averages of 97.3 (72.7–100) for the ASES score, 97.5 (75–100) for the Constant score, and 0.6 (0–8) on the VAS.

Conclusion

According to our results, there were no differences in postoperative results between simple and multifragmentary midshaft clavicle fractures. Patients across all groups reported satisfactory results.
Literature
5.
go back to reference Allman FL Jr (1967) Fractures and ligamentous injuries of the clavicle and its articulation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 49:774–784CrossRefPubMed Allman FL Jr (1967) Fractures and ligamentous injuries of the clavicle and its articulation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 49:774–784CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Rowe CR (1968) An atlas of anatomy and treatment of midclavicular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 58:29–42CrossRefPubMed Rowe CR (1968) An atlas of anatomy and treatment of midclavicular fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 58:29–42CrossRefPubMed
9.
Metadata
Title
Do postoperative outcomes vary between midshaft clavicle fractures of 2, 3, or more than 3 fragments?
Authors
Catalina Larrague
Facundo Miguel Galich
Tomas Martín Tavella
Nicolás Stramazzo
Nicolás Agustín Atala
Luciano Andrés Rossi
Ignacio Tanoira
Maximiliano Ranalletta
Publication date
16-05-2024
Publisher
Springer Paris
Published in
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology
Print ISSN: 1633-8065
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1068
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-024-03971-1