Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

15-07-2024 | Cholangiocarcinoma | Clinical Investigation

Comparison of Complications in Patients with Ductal Cholangiocarcinoma (CCC) and Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases (CRLMs) After Portal Vein Embolization (PVE): A Matched Cohort Study

Authors: F. De Beukelaer, V. Van den Bosch, C. Kuhl, F. Pedersoli, P. Bruners

Published in: CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology | Issue 9/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

To compare complications in patients with cholangiocarcinoma (CCC) and patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) after portal vein embolization (PVE) and to identify possible predictive factors.

Material and Methods

Retrospective analysis of consecutive patients, who underwent PVE between July 2011 and March 2020. The study groups were matched for sex and age. Multivariable analysis was performed for the endpoints of complications categorized according for their respective effect on surgical treatment: “Minor” complications had no effect on subsequent surgical treatment, while “intermediate” and “severe” complications delayed or prevented surgery.

Results

A total of 160 patients with either CCC (n = 80) or CRLMs (n = 80) were included: 34/160 experienced complications: 27 (CCC: 21; CRLMs: 6) “minor”, 4 (CCC: 3; CRLMs: 1) “intermediate”, and 3 (CCC: 2; CRLMs: 1) “severe” complications respectively (p = .01). Patients with CCC received a biliary drainage 5 days on average before PVE. Baseline bilirubin levels were 1.1 mg/dl in CCC patients and 0.55 mg/dl in CRLMs patients (p < .01). Postinterventional infections were more common in CCC patients. The preintervention future liver remnant volume (odds ratio (OR) 0.93; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.88–0.99; p = .02), body mass index (OR 1.19; 95% CI 1.04–1.36; p = .01), age (OR 0,91; 95% CI 0.84–0.99; p = .01), chemotherapy before PVE (OR 0.03; 95% CI 0.01–0.23; p < .01) and severe liver steatosis (OR 29.52; 95% CI 1.87–467,13; p = .02) were the only significant predictive factors for the occurrence of (minor) complications.

Conclusion

PVE can be performed in CCC patients with prior biliary drainage, with similar procedural safety as in patients with CRLMs.

Graphical Abstract

Appendix
This content is only visible if you are logged in and have the appropriate permissions.
Literature
This content is only visible if you are logged in and have the appropriate permissions.
Metadata
Title
Comparison of Complications in Patients with Ductal Cholangiocarcinoma (CCC) and Patients with Colorectal Liver Metastases (CRLMs) After Portal Vein Embolization (PVE): A Matched Cohort Study
Authors
F. De Beukelaer
V. Van den Bosch
C. Kuhl
F. Pedersoli
P. Bruners
Publication date
15-07-2024
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
CardioVascular and Interventional Radiology / Issue 9/2024
Print ISSN: 0174-1551
Electronic ISSN: 1432-086X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-024-03810-0

How can your team use biomarkers to improve management of AD? (Link opens in a new window)

Our experts explore using biomarker tests and interpreting results, establishing a shared decision-making approach with patients and caregivers, and applying biomarker testing to guide treatment strategies.

This content is intended for healthcare professionals outside of the UK.

Supported by:
  • Lilly
Developed by: Springer Healthcare IME
Register your interest

How can you integrate PET into your practice? (Link opens in a new window)

1.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)™

PET imaging is playing an increasingly critical role in managing AD. Our expert-led program will empower you with practical strategies and real-world case studies to effectively integrate it into clinical practice.

This content is intended for healthcare professionals outside of the UK.

Supported by:
  • Lilly
Developed by: Springer Healthcare IME
Register your interest