Skip to main content
Top

13-11-2024 | Cervical Cancer | Original Paper

Cervical cancer screening rates in females living with HIV at three healthcare settings in the United States, 2010–2019

Authors: Leigh Sheridan, Gaia Pocobelli, Melissa Anderson, Christopher I. Li, Gina R. Kruse, Jasmin A. Tiro, Aruna Kamineni

Published in: Cancer Causes & Control

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Females living with human immunodeficiency virus (FLWHIV) are at increased risk of cervical cancer and U.S. guidelines, first published in 2009 and updated since then, recommend more frequent screening in this population. We examined screening rates among FLWHIV in the U.S. during 2010–2019.

Methods

This cohort study included 18–89-year-old FLWHIV during 2010–2019 at three U.S. healthcare settings. Sociodemographics, comorbidities, and cervical cancer screening tests were ascertained from administrative and clinical databases. We reported cervical cancer screening rates overall and by modality. Generalized estimating equations with Poisson distribution were used to estimate screening rate ratios (SRRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the associations between screening rates and calendar year, age, race and ethnicity, and comorbidity.

Results

Among 3,556 FLWHIV, a total of 7,704 cervical cancer screening tests were received over 18,605 person-years during 2010–2019 (screening rate = 41.4 per 100 person-years). Relatively lower screening rates were associated with later calendar years (SRR = 0.71 [95% CI 0.68–0.75] for 2017–2019 versus 2010–2013), older age (SRR = 0.82 [95% CI 0.74–0.89] for 50–65-year-olds versus 18–29-year-olds), non-Hispanic white race versus non-Hispanic Black race (SRR = 0.89 [95% CI 0.81–0.98]) and greater comorbidity burden (SRR = 0.89 [95% CI 0.82–0.98] for ≥ 9 versus 0–6 comorbidity score).

Conclusion

The decrease in cervical cancer screening rates during 2010–2019 in this large cohort of FLWHIV may be explained at least partly by guideline changes during the study period recommending longer screening intervals. Our findings of relatively lower screening rates in FLWHIV who were non-Hispanic white, older, and with greater comorbidity burden should be confirmed in other U.S. settings.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Stelzle D, Tanaka LF, Lee KK et al (2021) Estimates of the global burden of cervical cancer associated with HIV. Lancet Glob Health 9:e161–e169CrossRefPubMed Stelzle D, Tanaka LF, Lee KK et al (2021) Estimates of the global burden of cervical cancer associated with HIV. Lancet Glob Health 9:e161–e169CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Abraham AG, D’Souza G, Jing Y et al (2013) Invasive cervical cancer risk among HIV-infected women: a North American multicohort collaboration prospective study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 62:405–413CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Abraham AG, D’Souza G, Jing Y et al (2013) Invasive cervical cancer risk among HIV-infected women: a North American multicohort collaboration prospective study. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 62:405–413CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Ahdieh L, Klein RS, Burk R et al (2001) Prevalence, incidence, and type-specific persistence of human papillomavirus in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive and HIV-negative women. J Infect Dis 184:682–690CrossRefPubMed Ahdieh L, Klein RS, Burk R et al (2001) Prevalence, incidence, and type-specific persistence of human papillomavirus in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive and HIV-negative women. J Infect Dis 184:682–690CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Force USPST, Curry SJ, Krist AH et al (2018) Screening for cervical cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. J Am Med Assoc 320:674–686CrossRef Force USPST, Curry SJ, Krist AH et al (2018) Screening for cervical cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. J Am Med Assoc 320:674–686CrossRef
5.
go back to reference Kaplan JE, Benson C, Holmes KK et al (2009) Guidelines for prevention and treatment of opportunistic infections in HIV-infected adults and adolescents: recommendations from CDC, the national institutes of health, and the HIV medicine association of the infectious diseases society of America. MMWR Recomm Rep 58:1–207PubMed Kaplan JE, Benson C, Holmes KK et al (2009) Guidelines for prevention and treatment of opportunistic infections in HIV-infected adults and adolescents: recommendations from CDC, the national institutes of health, and the HIV medicine association of the infectious diseases society of America. MMWR Recomm Rep 58:1–207PubMed
9.
go back to reference Oster AM, Sullivan PS, Blair JM (2009) Prevalence of cervical cancer screening of HIV-infected women in the United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 51:430–436CrossRefPubMed Oster AM, Sullivan PS, Blair JM (2009) Prevalence of cervical cancer screening of HIV-infected women in the United States. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 51:430–436CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Frazier EL, Sutton MY, Tie Y, McNaghten AD, Blair JM, Skarbinski J (2016) Screening for cervical cancer and sexually transmitted diseases among HIV-infected women. J Womens Health 25:124–132CrossRef Frazier EL, Sutton MY, Tie Y, McNaghten AD, Blair JM, Skarbinski J (2016) Screening for cervical cancer and sexually transmitted diseases among HIV-infected women. J Womens Health 25:124–132CrossRef
11.
go back to reference Baranoski AS, Horsburgh CR, Cupples LA, Aschengrau A, Stier EA (2011) Risk factors for nonadherence with Pap testing in HIV-infected women. J Womens Health 20:1635–1643CrossRef Baranoski AS, Horsburgh CR, Cupples LA, Aschengrau A, Stier EA (2011) Risk factors for nonadherence with Pap testing in HIV-infected women. J Womens Health 20:1635–1643CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Chapman Lambert CL (2013) Factors influencing cervical cancer screening in women infected with HIV: a review of the literature. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care 24:189–197CrossRefPubMed Chapman Lambert CL (2013) Factors influencing cervical cancer screening in women infected with HIV: a review of the literature. J Assoc Nurses AIDS Care 24:189–197CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Beaber EF, Kamineni A, Burnett-Hartman AN et al (2022) Evaluating and improving cancer screening process quality in a multilevel context: the PROSPR II consortium design and research agenda. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 31:1521–1531CrossRef Beaber EF, Kamineni A, Burnett-Hartman AN et al (2022) Evaluating and improving cancer screening process quality in a multilevel context: the PROSPR II consortium design and research agenda. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev 31:1521–1531CrossRef
14.
go back to reference Kamineni A, Tiro JA, Beaber EF et al (2019) Cervical cancer screening research in the PROSPR I consortium: rationale, methods and baseline findings from a US cohort. Int J Cancer 144:1460–1473CrossRefPubMed Kamineni A, Tiro JA, Beaber EF et al (2019) Cervical cancer screening research in the PROSPR I consortium: rationale, methods and baseline findings from a US cohort. Int J Cancer 144:1460–1473CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Haas JS, Cheng D, Yu L et al (2022) Variation in the receipt of human papilloma virus co-testing for cervical screening: Individual, provider, facility and healthcare system characteristics. Prev Med 154:106871CrossRefPubMed Haas JS, Cheng D, Yu L et al (2022) Variation in the receipt of human papilloma virus co-testing for cervical screening: Individual, provider, facility and healthcare system characteristics. Prev Med 154:106871CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Moyer VA, Force USPST (2012) Screening for cervical cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 156:880–91CrossRefPubMed Moyer VA, Force USPST (2012) Screening for cervical cancer: US preventive services task force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med 156:880–91CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA (1992) Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 45:613–619CrossRefPubMed Deyo RA, Cherkin DC, Ciol MA (1992) Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. J Clin Epidemiol 45:613–619CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P et al (2005) Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care 43:1130–1139CrossRefPubMed Quan H, Sundararajan V, Halfon P et al (2005) Coding algorithms for defining comorbidities in ICD-9-CM and ICD-10 administrative data. Med Care 43:1130–1139CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Barnes A, Betts AC, Borton EK et al (2018) Cervical cancer screening among HIV-infected women in an urban, United States safety-net healthcare system. AIDS 32:1861–1870CrossRefPubMed Barnes A, Betts AC, Borton EK et al (2018) Cervical cancer screening among HIV-infected women in an urban, United States safety-net healthcare system. AIDS 32:1861–1870CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Sabatino SA, Thompson TD, White MC et al (2023) Up-to-date breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening test use in the United States, 2021. Prev Chronic Dis 20:E94CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sabatino SA, Thompson TD, White MC et al (2023) Up-to-date breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening test use in the United States, 2021. Prev Chronic Dis 20:E94CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Ford S, Tarraf W, Williams KP, Roman LA, Leach R (2021) Differences in cervical cancer screening and follow-up for black and white women in the United States. Gynecol Oncol 160:369–374CrossRefPubMed Ford S, Tarraf W, Williams KP, Roman LA, Leach R (2021) Differences in cervical cancer screening and follow-up for black and white women in the United States. Gynecol Oncol 160:369–374CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Datta GD, Pana MP, Mayrand MH, Glenn B (2022) Racial/ethnic inequalities in cervical cancer screening in the United States: an outcome reclassification to better inform interventions and benchmarks. Prev Med 159:107055CrossRefPubMed Datta GD, Pana MP, Mayrand MH, Glenn B (2022) Racial/ethnic inequalities in cervical cancer screening in the United States: an outcome reclassification to better inform interventions and benchmarks. Prev Med 159:107055CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Miles-Richardson S, Allen S, Claridy MD, Booker EA, Gerbi G (2017) Factors associated with self-reported cervical cancer screening among women aged 18 years and older in the United States. J Community Health 42:72–77CrossRefPubMed Miles-Richardson S, Allen S, Claridy MD, Booker EA, Gerbi G (2017) Factors associated with self-reported cervical cancer screening among women aged 18 years and older in the United States. J Community Health 42:72–77CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Zanwar PP, Davis MM, Horner-Johnson W (2022) Assessing intersectional disparities in cervical cancer screening by disability status, race, and ethnicity. AJPM Focus 1:100019CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Zanwar PP, Davis MM, Horner-Johnson W (2022) Assessing intersectional disparities in cervical cancer screening by disability status, race, and ethnicity. AJPM Focus 1:100019CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Coronado GD, Nielson CM, Keast EM, Petrik AF, Suls JM (2021) The influence of multi-morbidities on colorectal cancer screening recommendations and completion. Cancer Causes Control 32:555–565CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Coronado GD, Nielson CM, Keast EM, Petrik AF, Suls JM (2021) The influence of multi-morbidities on colorectal cancer screening recommendations and completion. Cancer Causes Control 32:555–565CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
26.
go back to reference Makedonov I, Gu S, Paszat LF, Investigators of Ontario Cancer Screening Research N (2015) Organized breast screening improves reattendance compared to physician referral: a case control study. BMC Cancer 15:315CrossRef Makedonov I, Gu S, Paszat LF, Investigators of Ontario Cancer Screening Research N (2015) Organized breast screening improves reattendance compared to physician referral: a case control study. BMC Cancer 15:315CrossRef
27.
go back to reference Jensen LF, Pedersen AF, Andersen B, Vestergaard M, Vedsted P (2015) Non-participation in breast cancer screening for women with chronic diseases and multimorbidity: a population-based cohort study. BMC Cancer 15:798CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Jensen LF, Pedersen AF, Andersen B, Vestergaard M, Vedsted P (2015) Non-participation in breast cancer screening for women with chronic diseases and multimorbidity: a population-based cohort study. BMC Cancer 15:798CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
Metadata
Title
Cervical cancer screening rates in females living with HIV at three healthcare settings in the United States, 2010–2019
Authors
Leigh Sheridan
Gaia Pocobelli
Melissa Anderson
Christopher I. Li
Gina R. Kruse
Jasmin A. Tiro
Aruna Kamineni
Publication date
13-11-2024
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Cancer Causes & Control
Print ISSN: 0957-5243
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7225
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-024-01937-6

Elevate your expertise in aplastic anemia (Link opens in a new window)

Transform the way you care for your patients with aplastic anemia with our 3-module series using real-world case studies and expert insights. Discover why early diagnosis matters, explore the benefits and risks of current treatments, and develop tailored approaches for complex cases. 

Supported by:
  • Pfizer
Developed by: Springer Healthcare IME
Learn more
SPONSORED

Recent advances in the use of CAR T-cell therapies in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma

In this webinar, Professor Martin Dreyling and an esteemed international panel of CAR T-cell therapy experts discuss the latest data on the safety, efficacy, and clinical impact of CAR T-cell therapies in the treatment of r/r DLBCL and r/r FL.

Please note, this webinar is not intended for healthcare professionals based in the US and UK.

Sponsored by:
  • Novartis Pharma AG
Chaired by: Prof. Martin Dreyling
Developed by: Springer Healthcare
Watch now
Video