Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

01-12-2022 | Care | Research

Maternity care during COVID-19: a qualitative evidence synthesis of women’s and maternity care providers’ views and experiences

Authors: Sarah Jane Flaherty, Hannah Delaney, Karen Matvienko-Sikar, Valerie Smith

Published in: BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth | Issue 1/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

As COVID-19 continued to impact society and health, maternity care, as with many other healthcare sectors across the globe, experienced tumultuous changes. These changes have the potential to considerably impact on the experience of maternity care. To gain insight and understanding of the experience of maternity care during COVID-19, from the perspectives of women and maternity care providers, we undertook a qualitative evidence synthesis (QES).

Methods

The population of interest for the QES were pregnant and postpartum women, and maternity care providers, who provided qualitative data on their experiences of maternity care during COVID-19. The electronic databases of MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycINFO and the Cochrane COVID study register were systematically searched from 01 Jan 2020 to 13 June 2021. The methodological quality of the included studies was appraised using a modified version of the quality assessment tool, based on 12-criteria, designed by the Evidence for Policy and Practice Information coordinating Centre (EPPI-Centre). Data were extracted by two reviewers independently and synthesised using the Thomas and Harden framework. Confidence in the findings was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (GRADE-CERQual).

Results

Fifty records relating to 48 studies, involving 9,348 women and 2,538 maternity care providers, were included in the QES. The methodological quality of the studies varied from four studies meeting all 12 quality criteria to two studies meeting one quality criterion only. The synthesis revealed eight prominent themes. Five of these reflected women’s experiences: 1) Altered maternity care (women), 2) COVID-related restrictions, 3) Infection prevention and risk, 4) ‘the lived reality’ – navigating support systems, and 5) Interactions with maternity services. Three themes reflected maternity care providers’ experiences: 6) Altered maternity care (providers), 7) Professional and personal impact, and 8) Broader structural impact. Confidence in the findings was high or moderate.

Conclusion

Although some positive experiences were identified, overall, this QES reveals that maternity care during COVID-19 was negatively experienced by both women and maternity care providers. The pandemic and associated changes evoked an array of emotive states for both populations, many of which have the potential to impact on future health and wellbeing. Resource and care planning to mitigate medium- and longer-term adverse sequelae are required.

PROSPERO registration

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jardine J, Relph S, von Dadeleszen P, et al. Maternity services in the UK during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: a national survey of modifications to standard care. BJOG: An International J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021; 128(5): 880–889. Jardine J, Relph S, von Dadeleszen P, et al. Maternity services in the UK during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: a national survey of modifications to standard care. BJOG: An International J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021; 128(5): 880–889.
2.
go back to reference Panda S, O’Malley D, Barry P, Vallejo N, Smith V. Women’s views and experiences of maternity care during COVID-19 in Ireland: A ualitaitve descriptive study. Midwifery. 2021;103: 103092.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Panda S, O’Malley D, Barry P, Vallejo N, Smith V. Women’s views and experiences of maternity care during COVID-19 in Ireland: A ualitaitve descriptive study. Midwifery. 2021;103: 103092.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
3.
go back to reference Menendez C, Gonzalez R, Donnay F, Leke RGF. Avoiding indirect effects of COVID-19 on maternal and child health. Lancet Global Health. 2020;8(7):e863–4.PubMedCrossRef Menendez C, Gonzalez R, Donnay F, Leke RGF. Avoiding indirect effects of COVID-19 on maternal and child health. Lancet Global Health. 2020;8(7):e863–4.PubMedCrossRef
6.
go back to reference Hubba A, Chandni P, Eyad A, Amer H. COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in pregnancy: a systematic review. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2020;85(4):295–306.CrossRef Hubba A, Chandni P, Eyad A, Amer H. COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) infection in pregnancy: a systematic review. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2020;85(4):295–306.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Smith V, Panda S, O’Malley D, Vallejo N, Barry P. COVID-19 and clinical outcomes of pregnancy: a comparative study. Br J Midwifery. 2021;29(11):642–7.CrossRef Smith V, Panda S, O’Malley D, Vallejo N, Barry P. COVID-19 and clinical outcomes of pregnancy: a comparative study. Br J Midwifery. 2021;29(11):642–7.CrossRef
8.
go back to reference Woody C, Ferrari AJ, Siskind AJ, Whiteford H, Harris MG. A systematic review and meta-regression of the prevalence and incidence of perinatal depression. J Affect Disord. 2017;210:86–92.CrossRef Woody C, Ferrari AJ, Siskind AJ, Whiteford H, Harris MG. A systematic review and meta-regression of the prevalence and incidence of perinatal depression. J Affect Disord. 2017;210:86–92.CrossRef
9.
go back to reference Tomfohr-Madsen LM, Racine N, Giesbrecht GF, Lebel C, Madigan S. Depression and anxiety in pregnancy during COVID-19: A rapid review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res. 2021;300: 113912.PubMedCrossRef Tomfohr-Madsen LM, Racine N, Giesbrecht GF, Lebel C, Madigan S. Depression and anxiety in pregnancy during COVID-19: A rapid review and meta-analysis. Psychiatry Res. 2021;300: 113912.PubMedCrossRef
10.
go back to reference Stampini V, Monzani A, Caristia S, et al. The perception of Italian pregnant women and new mothers about their psychological wellbeing, lifestyle, delivery, and neonatal management experience during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown: a web-based survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):473.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Stampini V, Monzani A, Caristia S, et al. The perception of Italian pregnant women and new mothers about their psychological wellbeing, lifestyle, delivery, and neonatal management experience during the COVID-19 pandemic lockdown: a web-based survey. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21(1):473.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
go back to reference Fallon V, Davies SM, Silverio SA, Jackson L, De Pascalis L, Harrold JA. Psychosocial experiences of postnatal women during the COVID-19 pandemic. A UK-wide study of prevalence rates and risk factors for clinically relevant depression and anxiety. Psychiatry Res, 2021; 136: 157–166. Fallon V, Davies SM, Silverio SA, Jackson L, De Pascalis L, Harrold JA. Psychosocial experiences of postnatal women during the COVID-19 pandemic. A UK-wide study of prevalence rates and risk factors for clinically relevant depression and anxiety. Psychiatry Res, 2021; 136: 157–166.
12.
go back to reference Knight M, Bunch K, Cairns A, et al. on behalf of MBRRACE-UK. Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care Rapid Report: Learning from SARS-CoV-2-related and associated maternal deaths in the UK March-May 2020 Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford 2020. Knight M, Bunch K, Cairns A, et al. on behalf of MBRRACE-UK. Saving Lives, Improving Mothers’ Care Rapid Report: Learning from SARS-CoV-2-related and associated maternal deaths in the UK March-May 2020 Oxford: National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, University of Oxford 2020.
13.
go back to reference Lotta G, Fernandez M, Correa M. The vulnerabilities of the Brazilian health workforce during health emergencies: Analysing personal feelings, access to resources and work dynamics during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Health Pann Mgmt. 2021; 1–16. Lotta G, Fernandez M, Correa M. The vulnerabilities of the Brazilian health workforce during health emergencies: Analysing personal feelings, access to resources and work dynamics during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int J Health Pann Mgmt. 2021; 1–16.
14.
go back to reference Bailey E, Nightingale S. Navigating maternity service redesign in a global pandemic. A report from the field Midwifery. 2020;89: 102780.PubMed Bailey E, Nightingale S. Navigating maternity service redesign in a global pandemic. A report from the field Midwifery. 2020;89: 102780.PubMed
16.
go back to reference Newman M. COVID-19: doctors’ leaders warn that staff could quit and may die over lack of protective equipment. BMJ. 2020;368: m1257.PubMedCrossRef Newman M. COVID-19: doctors’ leaders warn that staff could quit and may die over lack of protective equipment. BMJ. 2020;368: m1257.PubMedCrossRef
17.
go back to reference Homer CSE, Davies-Tuck M, Dahlen HG, Scarf VL. The impact of planning for COVID-19 on private practising midwives in Australia. Women Birth. 2021;34:e32–7.PubMedCrossRef Homer CSE, Davies-Tuck M, Dahlen HG, Scarf VL. The impact of planning for COVID-19 on private practising midwives in Australia. Women Birth. 2021;34:e32–7.PubMedCrossRef
19.
go back to reference Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, Oliver S, Craig J. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:181.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Tong A, Flemming K, McInnes E, Oliver S, Craig J. Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2012;12:181.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
20.
go back to reference Cooke A, Smith D, Booth A. Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qual Health Res. 2012;22(10):1435–43.PubMedCrossRef Cooke A, Smith D, Booth A. Beyond PICO: the SPIDER tool for qualitative evidence synthesis. Qual Health Res. 2012;22(10):1435–43.PubMedCrossRef
21.
go back to reference Thomas J. Sutcliffe K. Harden A. Oakley A. Oliver S. Fees R. Brunton G. Kavanagh J. Children and healthy eating: a systematic review of barriers and facilitators. EPPI-Centre, University of London, 2003, London. Thomas J. Sutcliffe K. Harden A. Oakley A. Oliver S. Fees R. Brunton G. Kavanagh J. Children and healthy eating: a systematic review of barriers and facilitators. EPPI-Centre, University of London, 2003, London.
23.
go back to reference Nevin M, Hynes G, Smith V. Healthcare providers’ views and experiences of non-specialist palliative care in hospitals: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis. Palliative Med. 2020;34(5):605–18.CrossRef Nevin M, Hynes G, Smith V. Healthcare providers’ views and experiences of non-specialist palliative care in hospitals: a qualitative systematic review and thematic synthesis. Palliative Med. 2020;34(5):605–18.CrossRef
24.
go back to reference Thorn H, Uhrenfeldt L. Experiences of non-specialist nurses caring for patients and their significant others undergoing transitions during palliative end-of-life cancer care: a systematic review. JBI Database Systematic Reviews. 2017;15(6):1711–64.CrossRef Thorn H, Uhrenfeldt L. Experiences of non-specialist nurses caring for patients and their significant others undergoing transitions during palliative end-of-life cancer care: a systematic review. JBI Database Systematic Reviews. 2017;15(6):1711–64.CrossRef
26.
go back to reference Lewin S, Booth A, Glenton C, et al. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings: introduction to the series. Implement Sci. 2018;13(Suppl 1):2.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Lewin S, Booth A, Glenton C, et al. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings: introduction to the series. Implement Sci. 2018;13(Suppl 1):2.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
27.
go back to reference Lewin S, Bohren M, Rashidian A, et al. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings - paper 2: how to make an overall CERQual assessment of confidence and create a Summary of Qualitative Findings table. Implement Sci. 2018;13(Suppl 1):10.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Lewin S, Bohren M, Rashidian A, et al. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings - paper 2: how to make an overall CERQual assessment of confidence and create a Summary of Qualitative Findings table. Implement Sci. 2018;13(Suppl 1):10.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
go back to reference Munthe-Kaas H, Bohren MA, Glenton C, et al. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings - paper 3: how to assess methodological limitations. Implement Sci. 2018;13(Suppl 1):9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Munthe-Kaas H, Bohren MA, Glenton C, et al. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings - paper 3: how to assess methodological limitations. Implement Sci. 2018;13(Suppl 1):9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
29.
go back to reference Colvin CJ, Garside R, Wainwright M, et al. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings - paper 4: how to assess coherence. Implement Sci. 2018;13(Suppl 1):13.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Colvin CJ, Garside R, Wainwright M, et al. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings - paper 4: how to assess coherence. Implement Sci. 2018;13(Suppl 1):13.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
30.
go back to reference Glenton C, Carlsen B, Lewin S, et al. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings - paper 5: how to assess adequacy of data. Implement Sci. 2018;13(Suppl 1):14.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Glenton C, Carlsen B, Lewin S, et al. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings - paper 5: how to assess adequacy of data. Implement Sci. 2018;13(Suppl 1):14.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
31.
go back to reference Noyes J, Booth A, Lewin S, et al. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings - paper 6: how to assess relevance of the data. Implement Sci. 2018;13(Suppl 1):4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Noyes J, Booth A, Lewin S, et al. Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings - paper 6: how to assess relevance of the data. Implement Sci. 2018;13(Suppl 1):4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
32.
go back to reference Ali I, Sadique S, Ali S, Davis FR. Birthing between the “Traditional” and the “Modern”: Dai practices and childbearing women’s choices during COVID-19 in Pakistan. Front Sociol. 2021;6: 622223.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Ali I, Sadique S, Ali S, Davis FR. Birthing between the “Traditional” and the “Modern”: Dai practices and childbearing women’s choices during COVID-19 in Pakistan. Front Sociol. 2021;6: 622223.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
33.
go back to reference Anonymous. High risk and high and dry. AIMS J. 2020; 32(2):1–2. Anonymous. High risk and high and dry. AIMS J. 2020; 32(2):1–2.
36.
go back to reference Barbosa-Leiker C, Smith CL, Crespi EJ, Brooks O, Burduli E, Ranjo S, et al. Stressors, coping, and resources needed during the COVID-19 pandemic in a sample of perinatal women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21:171.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Barbosa-Leiker C, Smith CL, Crespi EJ, Brooks O, Burduli E, Ranjo S, et al. Stressors, coping, and resources needed during the COVID-19 pandemic in a sample of perinatal women. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21:171.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
37.
go back to reference Bremen RB, Neerland C, Bradley D, Burgess A, Barr E, Burcher P. Giving birth during the COVID-19 pandemic, perspectives from a sample of United States birthing persons during the first wave: March-June 2020. Birth. 2021;00:1–10. Bremen RB, Neerland C, Bradley D, Burgess A, Barr E, Burcher P. Giving birth during the COVID-19 pandemic, perspectives from a sample of United States birthing persons during the first wave: March-June 2020. Birth. 2021;00:1–10.
38.
go back to reference Castelino L. When partners are banned from birth. AIMS J. 2020;32(2):1–2. Castelino L. When partners are banned from birth. AIMS J. 2020;32(2):1–2.
39.
go back to reference Cooper M, King R. Women’s experiences of maternity care during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia. Aus College Midwives. 2021; www.midwives.org.au. Cooper M, King R. Women’s experiences of maternity care during the height of the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia. Aus College Midwives. 2021; www.​midwives.​org.​au.
40.
go back to reference Cullen S, Doherty J, Brosnan M. Women’s views on the visiting restrictions during COVID-19 in an Irish maternity hospital. Br J Mid. 2021;29(4):216–23. Cullen S, Doherty J, Brosnan M. Women’s views on the visiting restrictions during COVID-19 in an Irish maternity hospital. Br J Mid. 2021;29(4):216–23.
41.
go back to reference Einion-Waller A. Regan M. “Knowing That I Had a Choice Empowered Me”: Preparing for and Experiencing Birth during a Pandemic. 2021; Book Chapter in preparation received via personal communication (unpublished). Einion-Waller A. Regan M. “Knowing That I Had a Choice Empowered Me”: Preparing for and Experiencing Birth during a Pandemic. 2021; Book Chapter in preparation received via personal communication (unpublished).
42.
go back to reference Farewell CV, Jewell J, Walls J, Leiferman JA. A mixed-methods pilot study of perinatal risk and resilience during COVID-19. J Prim Care Comm Health. 2020;11:1–8.CrossRef Farewell CV, Jewell J, Walls J, Leiferman JA. A mixed-methods pilot study of perinatal risk and resilience during COVID-19. J Prim Care Comm Health. 2020;11:1–8.CrossRef
43.
go back to reference Farrell RM, Pierce M, Collart C, Craighead C, Coleridge M, Chien EK, et al. The impact of the emergence of COVID‐19 on women's prenatal genetic testing decisions. Prenat Diag. 2021; 1–9. Farrell RM, Pierce M, Collart C, Craighead C, Coleridge M, Chien EK, et al. The impact of the emergence of COVID‐19 on women's prenatal genetic testing decisions. Prenat Diag. 2021; 1–9.
45.
go back to reference Gomez-Roas M, Davis K, Leziak K, Jackson J, Williams BR, Feinglass JM, et al. Postpartum during a pandemic: challenges of low-income women with healthcare interactions during COVID-19. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021, Suppl Feb: S150(P227). Gomez-Roas M, Davis K, Leziak K, Jackson J, Williams BR, Feinglass JM, et al. Postpartum during a pandemic: challenges of low-income women with healthcare interactions during COVID-19. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021, Suppl Feb: S150(P227).
46.
go back to reference Javaid S, Barringer S, Compton SD, Kaselitz E, Muzik M, Moyer CA. The impact of COVID-19 on prenatal care in the United States: Qualitative analysis from a survey of 2519 pregnant women. Midwifery. 2021;98: 102991.PubMedCrossRef Javaid S, Barringer S, Compton SD, Kaselitz E, Muzik M, Moyer CA. The impact of COVID-19 on prenatal care in the United States: Qualitative analysis from a survey of 2519 pregnant women. Midwifery. 2021;98: 102991.PubMedCrossRef
47.
go back to reference Karavadra B, Stockl A, Prosser-Snelling E, Simpson P, Morris E. Women’s perceptions of COVID-19 and their healthcare experiences: a qualitative thematic analysis of a national survey of pregnant women in the United Kingdom. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20:600.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Karavadra B, Stockl A, Prosser-Snelling E, Simpson P, Morris E. Women’s perceptions of COVID-19 and their healthcare experiences: a qualitative thematic analysis of a national survey of pregnant women in the United Kingdom. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2020;20:600.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
48.
go back to reference Kumari A, Ranjan P, Sharma KA, Sahu A, Bharti J, Zangmo R, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on psychosocial functioning of peripartum women: A qualitative study comprising focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2021;152:321–7.CrossRef Kumari A, Ranjan P, Sharma KA, Sahu A, Bharti J, Zangmo R, et al. Impact of COVID-19 on psychosocial functioning of peripartum women: A qualitative study comprising focus group discussions and in-depth interviews. Int J Gynecol Obstet. 2021;152:321–7.CrossRef
49.
50.
go back to reference Mortazavi F, Ghardashi F. The lived experiences of pregnant women during COVID-19 pandemic: a descriptive phenomenological study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21:193.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Mortazavi F, Ghardashi F. The lived experiences of pregnant women during COVID-19 pandemic: a descriptive phenomenological study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2021;21:193.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
51.
go back to reference Perez A, Panagiotopoulou E, Curtis P, Robert R. Barriers and facilitators to mood and confidence in pregnancy and early parenthood during COVID-19 in the UK: mixed-methods synthesis survey. BJ Psych Open. 2021;7(e107):1–8. Perez A, Panagiotopoulou E, Curtis P, Robert R. Barriers and facilitators to mood and confidence in pregnancy and early parenthood during COVID-19 in the UK: mixed-methods synthesis survey. BJ Psych Open. 2021;7(e107):1–8.
52.
go back to reference Rhodes A, Kheireddine S, Smith A. Experiences, attitudes and needs of users of a pregnancy and parenting App (Baby Buddy) during the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed methods study. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2020;8(12): e23157.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Rhodes A, Kheireddine S, Smith A. Experiences, attitudes and needs of users of a pregnancy and parenting App (Baby Buddy) during the COVID-19 pandemic: A mixed methods study. JMIR mHealth uHealth. 2020;8(12): e23157.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
53.
go back to reference Sahin BM, Kabakci EN. The experiences of pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey: A qualitative study. Women Birth. 2021;34(2):162–9.CrossRef Sahin BM, Kabakci EN. The experiences of pregnant women during the COVID-19 pandemic in Turkey: A qualitative study. Women Birth. 2021;34(2):162–9.CrossRef
55.
go back to reference Spatz DL, Froh EB. Birth and breastfeeding in the hospital setting during the COVID-19 pandemic. MCN. 2020; 1–5. Spatz DL, Froh EB. Birth and breastfeeding in the hospital setting during the COVID-19 pandemic. MCN. 2020; 1–5.
56.
go back to reference Sweet L, Bradfield Z, Vasilevski V, Wynter K, Hauck Y, Kuliukas L, et al. Becoming a mother in the ‘new’ social world in Australia during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Midwifery. 2021;98: 102996.PubMedCrossRef Sweet L, Bradfield Z, Vasilevski V, Wynter K, Hauck Y, Kuliukas L, et al. Becoming a mother in the ‘new’ social world in Australia during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic. Midwifery. 2021;98: 102996.PubMedCrossRef
57.
go back to reference Upendra S, Devi S, Kaur J, Waghmare S, Barde S. A phenomenological study of pregnant women’s experience: COVID-19 lockdown period. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2020;14(4):3939–42. Upendra S, Devi S, Kaur J, Waghmare S, Barde S. A phenomenological study of pregnant women’s experience: COVID-19 lockdown period. Indian J Forensic Med Toxicol. 2020;14(4):3939–42.
58.
go back to reference Wallace I. Balancing the trade-offs. AIMS J. 2020;32(2):1–2. Wallace I. Balancing the trade-offs. AIMS J. 2020;32(2):1–2.
60.
go back to reference Burns L. The last normal place in the hospital. Contemp OB/GYN J. 2020;65(5):1–2. Burns L. The last normal place in the hospital. Contemp OB/GYN J. 2020;65(5):1–2.
62.
go back to reference Dulfe PAM, Alves VH, Pereira AV, Vieira BDG, Rodrigues DP, Marchiori GRS, et al. Nurse-midwives reconfiguring care in the scope of labor and births in COVID-19 times. Rev Bras Enferm. 2021;74(Suppl 1): e20200863.CrossRef Dulfe PAM, Alves VH, Pereira AV, Vieira BDG, Rodrigues DP, Marchiori GRS, et al. Nurse-midwives reconfiguring care in the scope of labor and births in COVID-19 times. Rev Bras Enferm. 2021;74(Suppl 1): e20200863.CrossRef
63.
go back to reference Elsayed S, Magandran J, Hassan S, Akpan E, Ciprike V, Milner M. Non-consultant hospital doctor’s views of COVID-19 measures in Irish maternity units. Ir Med J. 114(3):296. Elsayed S, Magandran J, Hassan S, Akpan E, Ciprike V, Milner M. Non-consultant hospital doctor’s views of COVID-19 measures in Irish maternity units. Ir Med J. 114(3):296.
64.
go back to reference Galle A, Semaan A, Huysmans E, Audet C, Asefa A, Delvaux T, et al. A double-edged sword - telemedicine for maternal care during COVID-19: findings from a global mixed-methods study of healthcare providers. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6: e004575.PubMedCrossRef Galle A, Semaan A, Huysmans E, Audet C, Asefa A, Delvaux T, et al. A double-edged sword - telemedicine for maternal care during COVID-19: findings from a global mixed-methods study of healthcare providers. BMJ Glob Health. 2021;6: e004575.PubMedCrossRef
66.
go back to reference Kang HS, Son Y, Kin MJ, Chae SM. Experiences of nurses caring for perinatal women and newborns during the COVID-19 pandemic: A descriptive qualitative study. Nurs Open. 2021;00:1–8. Kang HS, Son Y, Kin MJ, Chae SM. Experiences of nurses caring for perinatal women and newborns during the COVID-19 pandemic: A descriptive qualitative study. Nurs Open. 2021;00:1–8.
67.
go back to reference Madden N, Emeruwa UN, Friedman AM, Aubey JJ, Aziz A, Baptiste CD, et al. Telehealth uptake into prenatal care and provider attitudes during the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City: A quantitative and qualitative analysis. Am J Perinatol. 2020;37:1005–14.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Madden N, Emeruwa UN, Friedman AM, Aubey JJ, Aziz A, Baptiste CD, et al. Telehealth uptake into prenatal care and provider attitudes during the COVID-19 pandemic in New York City: A quantitative and qualitative analysis. Am J Perinatol. 2020;37:1005–14.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
68.
go back to reference Oparah JC, James JE, Barnett D, Jones LM, Melbourne D, Peprah S, et al. Creativity, resilience and resistance: Black birth workers’ responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Front Sociol. 2021;6: 636029.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Oparah JC, James JE, Barnett D, Jones LM, Melbourne D, Peprah S, et al. Creativity, resilience and resistance: Black birth workers’ responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. Front Sociol. 2021;6: 636029.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
70.
go back to reference Rimmer MP, Watter BA. on behalf of the UKARCOG Members. Provision of obstetrics and gynaecology services during the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey of junior doctors in the UK National Health Service. BJOG. 2020;127(9):1123–8.PubMedCrossRef Rimmer MP, Watter BA. on behalf of the UKARCOG Members. Provision of obstetrics and gynaecology services during the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey of junior doctors in the UK National Health Service. BJOG. 2020;127(9):1123–8.PubMedCrossRef
71.
go back to reference Schindler-Ruwisch J, Phillips KE. Breastfeeding during a pandemic: The influence of COVID-19 on lactation services in the North-eastern United Sates. J Human Lactat. 2021;37(2):260–8.CrossRef Schindler-Ruwisch J, Phillips KE. Breastfeeding during a pandemic: The influence of COVID-19 on lactation services in the North-eastern United Sates. J Human Lactat. 2021;37(2):260–8.CrossRef
72.
go back to reference Semaan A, Audet C, Huysmans E, Afolabi B, Assrag B, Banke-Thomas A. Voices from the frontline: findings from a thematic analysis of a rapid online global survey of maternal and newborn health professionals facing the COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5: e002967.PubMedCrossRef Semaan A, Audet C, Huysmans E, Afolabi B, Assrag B, Banke-Thomas A. Voices from the frontline: findings from a thematic analysis of a rapid online global survey of maternal and newborn health professionals facing the COVID-19 pandemic. BMJ Glob Health. 2020;5: e002967.PubMedCrossRef
73.
go back to reference Szabo RA, Wilson AN, Homer C, Vasilevski V, Sweet L, Wynter K, et al. Covid-19 changes to maternity care: Experiences of Australian doctors. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021; 1–8. Szabo RA, Wilson AN, Homer C, Vasilevski V, Sweet L, Wynter K, et al. Covid-19 changes to maternity care: Experiences of Australian doctors. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2021; 1–8.
74.
go back to reference Altman MR, Gavin AR, Eagen-Torkko MK, Kantrowitz-Gordon I, Khosa RM, Mohammed SA. Where the system failed: The COVID-19 pandemic’s impact on pregnancy and birth care. Global Qual Nurs Research. 2021;8:1–11. Altman MR, Gavin AR, Eagen-Torkko MK, Kantrowitz-Gordon I, Khosa RM, Mohammed SA. Where the system failed: The COVID-19 pandemic’s impact on pregnancy and birth care. Global Qual Nurs Research. 2021;8:1–11.
75.
go back to reference Bender WR, Srinivas S, Coutifaris P, Acker A, Hirshberg A. The psychological experience of obstetric patients and health care workers after implementation of SARS-CoV-2 testing. Am J Perinatol. 2020;37:1271–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef Bender WR, Srinivas S, Coutifaris P, Acker A, Hirshberg A. The psychological experience of obstetric patients and health care workers after implementation of SARS-CoV-2 testing. Am J Perinatol. 2020;37:1271–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
76.
go back to reference Bengalia B, Canzini D. “They would have stopped births, if they only could have”: Short- and Long-term impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic – a case study from Bologna Italy. Front Sociol. 2021;6: 614271.CrossRef Bengalia B, Canzini D. “They would have stopped births, if they only could have”: Short- and Long-term impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic – a case study from Bologna Italy. Front Sociol. 2021;6: 614271.CrossRef
77.
go back to reference Hailemariam S, Agegnehu W, Derese M. Exploring COVID-19 related factors influencing antenatal care services uptake: A qualitative study among women in a rural community in Southwest Ethiopia. J Prim Care Comm Health. 2021;12:1–8. Hailemariam S, Agegnehu W, Derese M. Exploring COVID-19 related factors influencing antenatal care services uptake: A qualitative study among women in a rural community in Southwest Ethiopia. J Prim Care Comm Health. 2021;12:1–8.
78.
go back to reference Ombere SO. Access to maternal health services during the COVID-19 pandemic: Experiences of indigent mothers and health care providers in Kilifi County. Kenya Front Sociol. 2021;6: 613042.PubMedCrossRef Ombere SO. Access to maternal health services during the COVID-19 pandemic: Experiences of indigent mothers and health care providers in Kilifi County. Kenya Front Sociol. 2021;6: 613042.PubMedCrossRef
79.
go back to reference Peahl AF, Powell A, Berlin H, Smith RD, Krans E, Waljee J, et al. Patient and provider perspectives of a new prenatal care model introduced in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;224(384):e1-11. Peahl AF, Powell A, Berlin H, Smith RD, Krans E, Waljee J, et al. Patient and provider perspectives of a new prenatal care model introduced in response to the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2021;224(384):e1-11.
80.
go back to reference Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. for the PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(94):264--269.PubMedCrossRef Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. for the PRISMA Group. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(94):264--269.PubMedCrossRef
81.
go back to reference Roland J, Lawrance E, Insel T, Christensen H. The digital health revolution: Transforming care through innovation and scale-up. Doha, Qatar: World Innovation Summit for Health, 2020. Roland J, Lawrance E, Insel T, Christensen H. The digital health revolution: Transforming care through innovation and scale-up. Doha, Qatar: World Innovation Summit for Health, 2020.
82.
go back to reference Slomian J, Honvo G, Emonts P, Reginster JY, Bruyere O. Consequences of maternal postpartum depression: A systematic review of maternal and infant outcomes. Women’s Health. 2019;15:1–55. Slomian J, Honvo G, Emonts P, Reginster JY, Bruyere O. Consequences of maternal postpartum depression: A systematic review of maternal and infant outcomes. Women’s Health. 2019;15:1–55.
83.
go back to reference Rayment-jones H, Dalrymple K, Harris James, et al. Does continuity og care and community-based antenatal care improve maternal and neonatal birth outcomes for women with social risk factors? A prospective observational study. PLOS ONE, 2021; 16(5), e0250947. Rayment-jones H, Dalrymple K, Harris James, et al. Does continuity og care and community-based antenatal care improve maternal and neonatal birth outcomes for women with social risk factors? A prospective observational study. PLOS ONE, 2021; 16(5), e0250947.
84.
go back to reference McLeish J, Redshaw M. Mothers’ accounts of the impact on emotional wellbeing of organised peer support in pregnancy and early parenthood: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17:28.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef McLeish J, Redshaw M. Mothers’ accounts of the impact on emotional wellbeing of organised peer support in pregnancy and early parenthood: a qualitative study. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017;17:28.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
85.
go back to reference Blondel B, Dutilh P, Delour M, Uzan S. Poor antennal care and pregnancy outcome. EJOGRB. 1993;50(3):191–6. Blondel B, Dutilh P, Delour M, Uzan S. Poor antennal care and pregnancy outcome. EJOGRB. 1993;50(3):191–6.
86.
go back to reference Schmitt N, Mattern E, Cignacco E. et al. Effects of the Covid-19 pandemic on maternity staff in 2020 – a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res, 2021; 21, 1364. Schmitt N, Mattern E, Cignacco E. et al. Effects of the Covid-19 pandemic on maternity staff in 2020 – a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res, 2021; 21, 1364.
87.
go back to reference Holton S, Wynter K, Trueman M, et al. Immediate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the work and personal lives of Australian hospital clinical staff. Aust Health Rev. 2021;45(6):656–66.PubMedCrossRef Holton S, Wynter K, Trueman M, et al. Immediate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the work and personal lives of Australian hospital clinical staff. Aust Health Rev. 2021;45(6):656–66.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Maternity care during COVID-19: a qualitative evidence synthesis of women’s and maternity care providers’ views and experiences
Authors
Sarah Jane Flaherty
Hannah Delaney
Karen Matvienko-Sikar
Valerie Smith
Publication date
01-12-2022
Publisher
BioMed Central
Keywords
Care
COVID-19
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth / Issue 1/2022
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2393
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12884-022-04724-w

Other articles of this Issue 1/2022

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth 1/2022 Go to the issue