Skip to main content
Top

09-05-2025 | Breast Cancer | News

No survival benefit of statins in early HER2-positive breast cancer

Author: Dr. Shreeya Nanda

print
PRINT
insite
SEARCH

medwireNews: Statin use is not associated with improved survival outcomes in patients with early-stage HER2-positive breast cancer, suggests a post-hoc analysis of the APHINITY trial.

“These results must be interpreted with caution due to the exploratory nature of the analysis and the associated limitations,” say Christian Maurer (University Hospital and German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg) and co-workers.

They explain in Breast Cancer Research and Treatment that “[p]reclinical models suggest that the mevalonate pathway, which can be targeted with statins, acts as an escape mechanism of survival and growth in HER2-[positive breast cancer] resistant to anti-HER2 therapies.”

And so, examining the association between statin use and outcomes in this patient population is warranted, continue the investigators.

They conducted a post-hoc analysis of the phase 3 APHINITY trial, which investigated the addition of pertuzumab versus placebo to adjuvant trastuzumab plus chemotherapy in 4804 patients with early HER2-positive breast cancer.

A total of 423 (8.8%) participants were taking statins at baseline or initiated them within a year of random assignment in the trial. They were significantly older than participants who were not statin users (median age 62 vs 50 years), more frequently postmenopausal (91.1 vs 47.6%), and had a higher BMI (median 27.3 vs 24.4 kg/m2).

Statin users were also significantly more likely than nonusers to have smaller tumors (≤1.9 cm, 46.1 vs 39.5%) and to be diagnosed with hyperlipidemia (83.0 vs 3.4%), hypertension (64.1 vs 18.4%), diabetes (24.6 vs 3.9%), and coronary heart disease (4.0 vs 0.6%).

On the other hand, anthracycline-containing chemotherapy regimens were used significantly less often among statin users than nonusers (71.4 vs 78.6%).

Multivariate analysis adjusting for age, menopausal status, BMI, nodal and hormone receptor status, presence of comorbidities, and treatment arm showed no significant association between statin use and invasive disease-free survival, distant relapse-free interval, or overall survival, with respective nonsignificant hazard ratios of 1.11, 1.21, and 1.16.

The researchers note that in univariate analysis, statin use “was associated with a trend to worse [overall survival],” but add that “[i]t should come as no surprise that patients who take statins under the assumption of a concomitant disease could have a higher risk of death during the course of a clinical trial follow-up.”

Furthermore, “[i]n a competing risk analysis with the event of interest being death due to [breast cancer], statin treatment was not associated with outcome,” they continue.

In conclusion, Maurer et al say: “Only a prospective, randomized study would be able to clarify whether the prognosis of patients with early breast cancer could be improved by statins. However, considering the high costs and complexity of running such a trial, it remains questionable whether this will ever happen.

“So far, apart from the current known indications for statin use, adding statins for early HER2-positive breast cancer is not recommended.”

medwireNews is an independent medical news service provided by Springer Healthcare Ltd. © 2025 Springer Healthcare Ltd, part of the Springer Nature Group

Breast Cancer Res Treat 2025; doi:10.1007/s10549-025-07699-2

print
PRINT

Related topics

Women’s health knowledge hub

Elevate your patient care with our comprehensive, evidence-based medical education on women's health. Designed to help you provide exceptional care for your female patients at every stage of life, we provide expert insights into topics such as reproductive health, menopause, breast cancer and sex-specific health risks and precision medicine.

Read more

Incorporating comprehensive genomic profiling into the standard-of-care for NSCLC and thyroid cancer

In this interactive webinar, experts Dr. Subbiah, Dr. Drilon, and Dr. Williams discuss best pathological practices within NSCLC and thyroid cancer, as well as how genomic testing can improve outcomes in clinical practice, using patient case studies as illustrations.

This content is intended only for US-based healthcare providers.

Supported by:
  • Illumina, Inc., and Eli Lilly and Company
Dr. Vivek Subbiah
Dr. Alexander Drilon
Dr. Michelle Williams
Developed by: Springer Healthcare
Watch now
Video

Elevate your expertise in aplastic anemia (Link opens in a new window)

Transform the way you care for your patients with aplastic anemia with our 3-module series using real-world case studies and expert insights. Discover why early diagnosis matters, explore the benefits and risks of current treatments, and develop tailored approaches for complex cases. 

Supported by:
  • Pfizer
Developed by: Springer Healthcare IME
Learn more