Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

Open Access 26-05-2024 | Breast Cancer | Research

Clinical breast exam contribution to breast cancer diagnosis in BRCA mutation carriers vs. average to intermediate risk women

Authors: Tehillah S. Menes, Douglas Zippel, Miri Sklair-Levy, Eitan Friedman, Rinat Bernstein-Molho, Renata Faermann, Dana Madorsky Feldman

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The contribution of clinical breast exam (CBE) to breast cancer diagnosis in average risk women undergoing regular screening mammography is minimal. To evaluate the role of CBE in high-risk women, we compared BC diagnosis by CBE in BRCA mutation carriers undergoing regular BC surveillance to average to intermediate risk women undergoing regular breast cancer screening.

Methods

A retrospective chart review of all consecutive screening visits of BRCA mutation carriers (January 2012–October 2022) and average to intermediate risk women (November 2016–December 2022) was completed. Women with histologically confirmed BC diagnosis were included. Additional CBE yield for BC diagnosis, defined as the percentage of all BC cases detected by CBE alone, was assessed in both groups.

Results

Overall, 12,997 CBEs were performed in 1,328 BRCA mutation carriers in whom 134 BCs were diagnosed. In 7,949 average to intermediate risk women who underwent 15,518 CBEs, 87 BCs were diagnosed. CBE contributed to BC diagnosis in 3 (2%) BRCA mutation carriers and 3 (4%) non-carriers. In both groups, over 4,000 CBEs were needed in order to diagnose one cancer. In all 3 BRCA mutation carriers BC was palpated during the surveillance round that did not include MRI. In the average to intermediate risk group, 2 of 3 cancers diagnosed following CBE findings were in a different location from the palpable finding.

Conclusions

The contribution of CBE to BC diagnosis is marginal for all women including BRCA mutation carriers. In BRCA mutation carriers, CBE appears redundant during the MRI surveillance round.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Menes TS, Coster D, Coster D, Shenhar-Tsarfaty S (2021) Contribution of clinical breast exam to cancer detection in women participating in a modern screening program. BMC Womens Health 21(1):368CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Menes TS, Coster D, Coster D, Shenhar-Tsarfaty S (2021) Contribution of clinical breast exam to cancer detection in women participating in a modern screening program. BMC Womens Health 21(1):368CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Oeffinger KC, Fontham ETH, Etzioni R et al (2015) Breast cancer screening for women at average risk: guideline update from the American cancer society. JAMA 314(15):1599–1614CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Oeffinger KC, Fontham ETH, Etzioni R et al (2015) Breast cancer screening for women at average risk: guideline update from the American cancer society. JAMA 314(15):1599–1614CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
go back to reference Network NCC. NCCN Guidelines Version 1.2022 Breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Accessed 30 May 2023 Network NCC. NCCN Guidelines Version 1.2022 Breast cancer screening and diagnosis. Accessed 30 May 2023
5.
go back to reference Madorsky-Feldman D, Sklair-Levy M, Perri T et al (2016) An international survey of surveillance schemes for unaffected BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 157(2):319–327CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Madorsky-Feldman D, Sklair-Levy M, Perri T et al (2016) An international survey of surveillance schemes for unaffected BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Breast Cancer Res Treat 157(2):319–327CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Warner E (2018) Screening BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers for breast cancer. Cancers (Basel) 10(12):477CrossRefPubMed Warner E (2018) Screening BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers for breast cancer. Cancers (Basel) 10(12):477CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Warner E, Plewes DB, Hill KA et al (2004) Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA 292(11):1317–1325CrossRefPubMed Warner E, Plewes DB, Hill KA et al (2004) Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA 292(11):1317–1325CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening Study Group et al (2004) Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 351(5):427–437CrossRefPubMed Kriege M, Brekelmans CT, Boetes C Magnetic Resonance Imaging Screening Study Group et al (2004) Efficacy of MRI and mammography for breast-cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. N Engl J Med 351(5):427–437CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Trop I, Lalonde L, Mayrand MH, David J, Larouche N, Provencher D (2010) Multimodality breast cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. Curr Oncol 17(3):28–36CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Trop I, Lalonde L, Mayrand MH, David J, Larouche N, Provencher D (2010) Multimodality breast cancer screening in women with a familial or genetic predisposition. Curr Oncol 17(3):28–36CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
13.
go back to reference Rijnsburger AJ, Obdeijn IM, Kaas R et al (2010) BRCA1-associated breast cancers present differently from BRCA2-associated and familial cases: long-term follow-up of the Dutch MRISC Screening Study. J Clin Oncol 28(36):5265–5273CrossRefPubMed Rijnsburger AJ, Obdeijn IM, Kaas R et al (2010) BRCA1-associated breast cancers present differently from BRCA2-associated and familial cases: long-term follow-up of the Dutch MRISC Screening Study. J Clin Oncol 28(36):5265–5273CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Mihalco SP, Keeling SB, Murphy SF, O’Keeffe SA (2020) Comparison of the utility of clinical breast examination and MRI in the surveillance of women with a high risk of breast cancer. Clin Radiol 75(3):194–199CrossRefPubMed Mihalco SP, Keeling SB, Murphy SF, O’Keeffe SA (2020) Comparison of the utility of clinical breast examination and MRI in the surveillance of women with a high risk of breast cancer. Clin Radiol 75(3):194–199CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC et al (2005) Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23(33):8469–8476CrossRefPubMed Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC et al (2005) Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 23(33):8469–8476CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Clinical breast exam contribution to breast cancer diagnosis in BRCA mutation carriers vs. average to intermediate risk women
Authors
Tehillah S. Menes
Douglas Zippel
Miri Sklair-Levy
Eitan Friedman
Rinat Bernstein-Molho
Renata Faermann
Dana Madorsky Feldman
Publication date
26-05-2024
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment / Issue 1/2024
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07345-3

Women’s health knowledge hub

Elevate your patient care with our comprehensive, evidence-based medical education on women's health. Designed to help you provide exceptional care for your female patients at every stage of life, we provide expert insights into topics such as reproductive health, menopause, breast cancer and sex-specific health risks and precision medicine.

Read more

Incorporating comprehensive genomic profiling into the standard-of-care for NSCLC and thyroid cancer

In this interactive webinar, experts Dr. Subbiah, Dr. Drilon, and Dr. Williams discuss best pathological practices within NSCLC and thyroid cancer, as well as how genomic testing can improve outcomes in clinical practice, using patient case studies as illustrations.

This content is intended only for US-based healthcare providers.

Supported by:
  • Illumina, Inc., and Eli Lilly and Company
Dr. Vivek Subbiah
Dr. Alexander Drilon
Dr. Michelle Williams
Developed by: Springer Healthcare
Watch now
Video

Elevate your expertise in aplastic anemia (Link opens in a new window)

Transform the way you care for your patients with aplastic anemia with our 3-module series using real-world case studies and expert insights. Discover why early diagnosis matters, explore the benefits and risks of current treatments, and develop tailored approaches for complex cases. 

Supported by:
  • Pfizer
Developed by: Springer Healthcare IME
Learn more