Skip to main content
Top

Open Access 25-09-2024 | Breast Cancer | Original Article

Breast cancer drugs: FDA approval, development time, efficacy, clinical benefits, innovation, trials, endpoints, quality of life, value, and price

Authors: Julia Caroline Michaeli, Thomas Michaeli, Dario Trapani, Sebastian Albers, Dominik Dannehl, Rachel Würstlein, Daniel Tobias Michaeli

Published in: Breast Cancer

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

This study analyzes the development, benefits, trial evidence, and price of new breast cancer drugs with US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval.

Methods

We identified 26 drugs with 42 FDA-approved indications for early and metastatic breast cancer (2000–2023). Data were collected from FDA labels, clinicaltrials.gov, and Medicare and Medicaid. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) hazard ratios (HRs) and tumor response’s relative risk (RR) alongside objective response rate (ORR) were meta-analyzed.

Results

The median development time for breast cancer drugs was 7.8 years (95% CI 6.2–10.8). 26% of treatments were considered innovative (“first-in-indication”) with 88% acting via a targeted mechanism. 64% were small molecules, 19% antibodies, and 18% antibody-drug conjugates. 38% were approved for HR + and 31% for HER2 + breast cancer. 6 indications were for early and 36 for metastatic breast cancer. Indications utilized FDA’s special programs: orphan (2%), fast track (24%), accelerated approval (19%), priority review (74%), breakthrough therapy (44%). Approval was predominantly supported by phase 3 trials (88%) of randomized controlled design (66%), enrolling a median of 585 patients (IQR 417–752) at 181 centers (IQR 142–223) across 19 countries (IQR 17–20). New drugs’ HR were 0.78 for OS (95% CI 0.74–0.82) and 0.59 for PFS (95% CI 0.54–0.64) with a RR for tumor response of 1.61 (95% CI 1.46–1.76). Median improvements of OS were 2.8 months (IQR 1.8–5.8) and PFS were 4.4 months (IQR 2.2–7.1). In single-arm trials, the average ORR was 31% (95% CI 10–53). In meta-regressions, the correlation between OS/PFS was 0.34 (p = 0.031) and OS/response was 0.01 (p = 0.435). 60% of treatments had a ‘high-value’ ESMO-MCBS score with 14% demonstrating improvements in quality of life. The median price was $16,013 per month (95% CI 13,097–17,617). There was no association between prices and patient benefit. The median value per life year gained was $62,419 (IQR 25,840–86,062).

Conclusions

Over the past two decades, the development of innovative and effective drugs transformed the treatment landscape for breast cancer patients. Yet, investigators and regulators must safeguard that highly-priced new drugs demonstrate improvements in patient-centered clinical endpoints: overall survival and quality of life.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49.CrossRefPubMed Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71:209–49.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Trapani D, Ginsburg O, Fadelu T, Lin NU, Hassett M, Ilbawi AM, Anderson BO, Curigliano G. Global challenges and policy solutions in breast cancer control. Cancer Treat Rev. 2022;104: 102339.CrossRefPubMed Trapani D, Ginsburg O, Fadelu T, Lin NU, Hassett M, Ilbawi AM, Anderson BO, Curigliano G. Global challenges and policy solutions in breast cancer control. Cancer Treat Rev. 2022;104: 102339.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Giaquinto AN, Sung H, Miller KD, Kramer JL, Newman LA, Minihan A, Jemal A, Siegel RL. Breast cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:524–41.CrossRefPubMed Giaquinto AN, Sung H, Miller KD, Kramer JL, Newman LA, Minihan A, Jemal A, Siegel RL. Breast cancer statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:524–41.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Trogdon JG, Liu X, Reeder-Hayes KE, Rotter J, Ekwueme DU, Wheeler SB. Productivity costs associated with metastatic breast cancer in younger, midlife, and older women. Cancer. 2020;126:4118–25.CrossRefPubMed Trogdon JG, Liu X, Reeder-Hayes KE, Rotter J, Ekwueme DU, Wheeler SB. Productivity costs associated with metastatic breast cancer in younger, midlife, and older women. Cancer. 2020;126:4118–25.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Braybrooke J, Bradley R, Gray R, et al. Anthracycline-containing and taxane-containing chemotherapy for early-stage operable breast cancer: a patient-level meta-analysis of 100 000 women from 86 randomised trials. The Lancet. 2023;401:1277–92.CrossRef Braybrooke J, Bradley R, Gray R, et al. Anthracycline-containing and taxane-containing chemotherapy for early-stage operable breast cancer: a patient-level meta-analysis of 100 000 women from 86 randomised trials. The Lancet. 2023;401:1277–92.CrossRef
6.
go back to reference Gogate A, Wheeler SB, Reeder-Hayes KE, Ekwueme DU, Fairley TL, Drier S, Trogdon JG. Projecting the prevalence and costs of metastatic breast cancer from 2015 through 2030. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2021;5:63.CrossRef Gogate A, Wheeler SB, Reeder-Hayes KE, Ekwueme DU, Fairley TL, Drier S, Trogdon JG. Projecting the prevalence and costs of metastatic breast cancer from 2015 through 2030. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2021;5:63.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Salas-Vega S, Iliopoulos O, Mossialos E. Assessment of overall survival, quality of life, and safety benefits associated with new cancer medicines. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3:382–90.CrossRefPubMed Salas-Vega S, Iliopoulos O, Mossialos E. Assessment of overall survival, quality of life, and safety benefits associated with new cancer medicines. JAMA Oncol. 2017;3:382–90.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Michaeli DT, Michaeli T. Overall survival, progression-free survival, and tumor response benefit supporting initial FDA approval and indication extension of new cancer drugs, 2003–2021. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40:4095–106.CrossRefPubMed Michaeli DT, Michaeli T. Overall survival, progression-free survival, and tumor response benefit supporting initial FDA approval and indication extension of new cancer drugs, 2003–2021. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40:4095–106.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Samuel JN, Booth CM, Eisenhauer E, Brundage M, Berry SR, Gyawali B. Association of quality-of-life outcomes in cancer drug trials with survival outcomes and drug class. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8:879–86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Samuel JN, Booth CM, Eisenhauer E, Brundage M, Berry SR, Gyawali B. Association of quality-of-life outcomes in cancer drug trials with survival outcomes and drug class. JAMA Oncol. 2022;8:879–86.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Michaeli DT, Michaeli T. Cancer drug prices in the United States: efficacy, innovation, clinical trial evidence, and epidemiology. Value Health. 2023;26:1590–600.CrossRefPubMed Michaeli DT, Michaeli T. Cancer drug prices in the United States: efficacy, innovation, clinical trial evidence, and epidemiology. Value Health. 2023;26:1590–600.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Michaeli DT, Michaeli T. Launch and post-launch prices of injectable cancer drugs in the US: clinical benefit, innovation, epidemiology, and competition. Pharmacoeconomics. 2024;42(1):117–131.CrossRefPubMed Michaeli DT, Michaeli T. Launch and post-launch prices of injectable cancer drugs in the US: clinical benefit, innovation, epidemiology, and competition. Pharmacoeconomics. 2024;42(1):117–131.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Vokinger KN, Hwang TJ, Grischott T, Reichert S, Tibau A, Rosemann T, Kesselheim AS. Prices and clinical benefit of cancer drugs in the USA and Europe: a cost-benefit analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:664–70.CrossRefPubMed Vokinger KN, Hwang TJ, Grischott T, Reichert S, Tibau A, Rosemann T, Kesselheim AS. Prices and clinical benefit of cancer drugs in the USA and Europe: a cost-benefit analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2020;21:664–70.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Michaeli T, Jürges H, Michaeli DT. FDA approval, clinical trial evidence, efficacy, epidemiology, and price for non-orphan and ultra-rare, rare, and common orphan cancer drug indications: cross sectional analysis. BMJ. 2023;281: e073242.CrossRef Michaeli T, Jürges H, Michaeli DT. FDA approval, clinical trial evidence, efficacy, epidemiology, and price for non-orphan and ultra-rare, rare, and common orphan cancer drug indications: cross sectional analysis. BMJ. 2023;281: e073242.CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Michaeli DT, Michaeli T, Albers S, Boch T, Michaeli JC. Special FDA designations for drug development: orphan, fast track, accelerated approval, priority review, and breakthrough therapy. Eur J Health Econ. 2024;25(6):979–997.CrossRefPubMed Michaeli DT, Michaeli T, Albers S, Boch T, Michaeli JC. Special FDA designations for drug development: orphan, fast track, accelerated approval, priority review, and breakthrough therapy. Eur J Health Econ. 2024;25(6):979–997.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Michaeli DT, Michaeli T, Albers S, Michaeli JC. Clinical benefit, development, innovation, trials, epidemiology, and price for cancer drugs and indications with multiple special FDA designations. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024;116(2):216–229.CrossRefPubMed Michaeli DT, Michaeli T, Albers S, Michaeli JC. Clinical benefit, development, innovation, trials, epidemiology, and price for cancer drugs and indications with multiple special FDA designations. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2024;116(2):216–229.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Del Paggio JC, Sullivan R, Schrag D, Hopman WM, Azariah B, Pramesh CS, Tannock IF, Booth CM. Delivery of meaningful cancer care: a retrospective cohort study assessing cost and benefit with the ASCO and ESMO frameworks. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:887–94.CrossRefPubMed Del Paggio JC, Sullivan R, Schrag D, Hopman WM, Azariah B, Pramesh CS, Tannock IF, Booth CM. Delivery of meaningful cancer care: a retrospective cohort study assessing cost and benefit with the ASCO and ESMO frameworks. Lancet Oncol. 2017;18:887–94.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Mitchell AP, Tabatabai SM, Dey P, Ohn JA, Curry MA, Bach PB. The association between clinical value and financial cost of cancer treatments: a cross-sectional analysis. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw JNCCN. 2020;18:1349–53.CrossRefPubMed Mitchell AP, Tabatabai SM, Dey P, Ohn JA, Curry MA, Bach PB. The association between clinical value and financial cost of cancer treatments: a cross-sectional analysis. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw JNCCN. 2020;18:1349–53.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Salas-Vega S, Shearer E. Relationship between costs and clinical benefits of new cancer medicines in Australia, France, the UK, and the US. Soc Sci Med. 1982;258: 113042.CrossRef Salas-Vega S, Shearer E. Relationship between costs and clinical benefits of new cancer medicines in Australia, France, the UK, and the US. Soc Sci Med. 1982;258: 113042.CrossRef
20.
go back to reference Gordon N, Stemmer SM, Greenberg D, Goldstein DA. Trajectories of injectable cancer drug costs after launch in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:319–25.CrossRefPubMed Gordon N, Stemmer SM, Greenberg D, Goldstein DA. Trajectories of injectable cancer drug costs after launch in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2018;36:319–25.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Bach PB. Limits on Medicare’s ability to control rising spending on cancer drugs. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:626–33.CrossRefPubMed Bach PB. Limits on Medicare’s ability to control rising spending on cancer drugs. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:626–33.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, Initiative STROBE. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370:1453–7.CrossRef von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, Initiative STROBE. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370:1453–7.CrossRef
23.
go back to reference Murthy RK, Loi S, Okines A, et al. Tucatinib, trastuzumab, and capecitabine for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:597–609.CrossRefPubMed Murthy RK, Loi S, Okines A, et al. Tucatinib, trastuzumab, and capecitabine for HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2020;382:597–609.CrossRefPubMed
24.
go back to reference Parikh RB, Hubbard RA, Wang E, Royce TJ, Cohen AB, Clark AS, Mamtani R. Exposure to US cancer drugs with lack of confirmed benefit after US food and drug administration accelerated approval. JAMA Oncol. 2023;9:567–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Parikh RB, Hubbard RA, Wang E, Royce TJ, Cohen AB, Clark AS, Mamtani R. Exposure to US cancer drugs with lack of confirmed benefit after US food and drug administration accelerated approval. JAMA Oncol. 2023;9:567–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
25.
go back to reference Wright K, Mittal A, Gyawali B. Surrogate endpoints for HTA decisions of breast cancer drugs: utility and pitfalls. Curr Opin Oncol. 2023;35(6):513–521.CrossRefPubMed Wright K, Mittal A, Gyawali B. Surrogate endpoints for HTA decisions of breast cancer drugs: utility and pitfalls. Curr Opin Oncol. 2023;35(6):513–521.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Chen EY, Joshi SK, Tran A, Prasad V. Estimation of Study Time Reduction Using Surrogate End Points Rather Than Overall Survival in Oncology Clinical Trials. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179:642–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Chen EY, Joshi SK, Tran A, Prasad V. Estimation of Study Time Reduction Using Surrogate End Points Rather Than Overall Survival in Oncology Clinical Trials. JAMA Intern Med. 2019;179:642–7.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Haslam A, Hey SP, Gill J. Prasad V (2019) A systematic review of trial-level meta-analyses measuring the strength of association between surrogate end-points and overall survival in oncology. Eur J Cancer Oxf Engl. 1990;106:196–211.CrossRef Haslam A, Hey SP, Gill J. Prasad V (2019) A systematic review of trial-level meta-analyses measuring the strength of association between surrogate end-points and overall survival in oncology. Eur J Cancer Oxf Engl. 1990;106:196–211.CrossRef
28.
go back to reference Prasad V, Kim C, Burotto M, Vandross A. The strength of association between surrogate end points and survival in oncology: a systematic review of trial-level meta-analyses. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175:1389–98.CrossRefPubMed Prasad V, Kim C, Burotto M, Vandross A. The strength of association between surrogate end points and survival in oncology: a systematic review of trial-level meta-analyses. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175:1389–98.CrossRefPubMed
29.
go back to reference Kovic B, Jin X, Kennedy SA, et al. Evaluating progression-free survival as a surrogate outcome for health-related quality of life in oncology: a systematic review and quantitative analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178:1586–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kovic B, Jin X, Kennedy SA, et al. Evaluating progression-free survival as a surrogate outcome for health-related quality of life in oncology: a systematic review and quantitative analysis. JAMA Intern Med. 2018;178:1586–96.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
30.
go back to reference Michaeli DT, Michaeli T, Albers S, Michaeli JC. Clinical trial design and treatment effects: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled and single-arm trials supporting 437 FDA approvals of cancer drugs and indications. BMJ Evid Based Med. Published online May 17, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjebm-2023-112544 Michaeli DT, Michaeli T, Albers S, Michaeli JC. Clinical trial design and treatment effects: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled and single-arm trials supporting 437 FDA approvals of cancer drugs and indications. BMJ Evid Based Med. Published online May 17, 2024. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1136/​bmjebm-2023-112544
31.
go back to reference Olivier T, Haslam A, Prasad V. Post-progression treatment in cancer randomized trials: a cross-sectional study of trials leading to FDA approval and published trials between 2018 and 2020. BMC Cancer. 2023;23:448.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Olivier T, Haslam A, Prasad V. Post-progression treatment in cancer randomized trials: a cross-sectional study of trials leading to FDA approval and published trials between 2018 and 2020. BMC Cancer. 2023;23:448.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Olivier T, Haslam A, Prasad V (2024) Postrecurrence treatment in neoadjuvant or adjuvant FDA registration trials: a systematic review. JAMA Oncol e241569 Olivier T, Haslam A, Prasad V (2024) Postrecurrence treatment in neoadjuvant or adjuvant FDA registration trials: a systematic review. JAMA Oncol e241569
34.
go back to reference Im S-A, Lu Y-S, Bardia A, et al. Overall survival with ribociclib plus endocrine therapy in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:307–16.CrossRefPubMed Im S-A, Lu Y-S, Bardia A, et al. Overall survival with ribociclib plus endocrine therapy in breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2019;381:307–16.CrossRefPubMed
35.
go back to reference Pichler M, Steyrer J (2021) Cost-effectiveness analysis of the use of immunotherapy in metastatic solid tumours in Austria by applying the ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) version 1.1. ESMO Open 6:100198 Pichler M, Steyrer J (2021) Cost-effectiveness analysis of the use of immunotherapy in metastatic solid tumours in Austria by applying the ESMO-Magnitude of Clinical Benefit Scale (ESMO-MCBS) version 1.1. ESMO Open 6:100198
36.
go back to reference Pham FY-V, Jacquet E, Taleb A, et al. Survival, cost and added therapeutic benefit of drugs granted early access through the French temporary authorization for use program in solid tumors from 2009 to 2019. Int J Cancer. 2022;151:1345–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pham FY-V, Jacquet E, Taleb A, et al. Survival, cost and added therapeutic benefit of drugs granted early access through the French temporary authorization for use program in solid tumors from 2009 to 2019. Int J Cancer. 2022;151:1345–54.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
go back to reference Loibl S, André F, Bachelot T, et al. Early breast cancer: ESMO clinical practice guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2024;35(2):159–182.CrossRefPubMed Loibl S, André F, Bachelot T, et al. Early breast cancer: ESMO clinical practice guideline for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2024;35(2):159–182.CrossRefPubMed
38.
go back to reference Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol. 2021;32:1475–95.CrossRef Gennari A, André F, Barrios CH, et al. ESMO clinical practice guideline for the diagnosis, staging and treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. Ann Oncol Off J Eur Soc Med Oncol. 2021;32:1475–95.CrossRef
39.
go back to reference Booth CM, Sengar M, Goodman A, et al. Common sense oncology: outcomes that matter. Lancet Oncol. 2023;24:833–5.CrossRefPubMed Booth CM, Sengar M, Goodman A, et al. Common sense oncology: outcomes that matter. Lancet Oncol. 2023;24:833–5.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Breast cancer drugs: FDA approval, development time, efficacy, clinical benefits, innovation, trials, endpoints, quality of life, value, and price
Authors
Julia Caroline Michaeli
Thomas Michaeli
Dario Trapani
Sebastian Albers
Dominik Dannehl
Rachel Würstlein
Daniel Tobias Michaeli
Publication date
25-09-2024
Publisher
Springer Nature Singapore
Published in
Breast Cancer
Print ISSN: 1340-6868
Electronic ISSN: 1880-4233
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-024-01634-x

2024 ESMO Congress

Recent advances in the use of CAR T-cell therapies in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma

  • Webinar | 01-10-2024 | 12:30 (CEST)

Live event concluded

In this webinar, Professor Martin Dreyling and an esteemed, international panel of CAR-T experts discuss the latest data on the safety, efficacy, and clinical impact of CAR T-cell therapies in the treatment of r/r DLBCL and r/r FL.

Please note, this webinar is not intended for healthcare professionals based in the US and UK.

Sponsored by: Novartis Pharma AG

Chaired by: Prof. Martin Dreyling
Developed by: Springer Healthcare
Get a reminder for the on-demand version