Skip to main content
Top

Open Access 07-12-2024 | Breast Cancer | Research

Apo10 and TKTL1 in blood macrophages as potential biomarkers for early diagnosis of operable breast cancer

Authors: Minqing Wu, Qiyu Huang, Lijuan Zhang, Yuying Liu, Musheng Zeng, Chuanbo Xie

Published in: Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Login to get access

Abstract

Objective

Blood macrophage Apo10 and TKTL1 detection is a novel, noninvasive cancer screening approach, but its relevance in breast cancer remains uncertain. We compared the potential diagnostic value of Apo10 and TKTL1 with commonly used tumor markers in differentiating breast cancer patients.

Methods

Physical examination and blood sample data from breast cancer patients who did not receive surgery or chemotherapy (retrospective; breast cancer group) and those with benign breast nodules and completely healthy subjects (prospective; control group) were collected from October 2020 to July 2022 at Sun Yat-sen University. Descriptive statistics and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were generated. The area under the ROC curve (AUROC) was calculated to compare the diagnostic efficiency of Apo10 and TKTL1 with conventional biomarkers (carcinoembryonic antigen [CEA], cancer antigens [CA-125, CA-199, CA-153]) in differentiating breast cancer from healthy breasts and benign breast nodules.

Results

From October 2020 to July 2022, 153 breast cancer patients (primarily early-stage disease: n = 113 (73.9%) stage I/II) and 153 control participants (benign breast nodules, n = 56; healthy, n = 97) were included in this study. The breast cancer subtypes were mainly invasive ductal carcinoma (92.8%), with a few cases of DCIS (5.9%), infiltrating lobular carcinoma (0.7%), and mucinous carcinoma (0.7%). Notably, Apo10, TKTL1, and Apo10 + TKTL1 (APT) levels were significantly greater in the cancer group than in the control group (P < 0.001), demonstrating high diagnostic value (AUC = 0.901, 0.871, 0.938) that surpassed CA-125, CA-199, CA-153, and CEA. In a subgroup analysis excluding stage III patients, APT-based breast cancer screening was minimally affected, with the AUROC (0.933–0.938) varying by ≤ 1%.

Conclusion

Compared with conventional biomarkers, Apo10, TKTL1, and APT showed superior early-stage breast cancer screening efficacy, potentially emerging as a promising marker for discriminating breast cancer from healthy breasts and nontumoral lesions.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Sung H et al (2021) Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71(3):209–249CrossRefPubMed Sung H et al (2021) Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71(3):209–249CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Zheng R et al (2022) Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2016. J Natl Cancer Center 2(1):1–9CrossRef Zheng R et al (2022) Cancer incidence and mortality in China, 2016. J Natl Cancer Center 2(1):1–9CrossRef
3.
go back to reference Criscitiello C, Corti C (2022) Breast cancer genetics: diagnostics and treatment. Genes (Basel) 13(9):1593CrossRefPubMed Criscitiello C, Corti C (2022) Breast cancer genetics: diagnostics and treatment. Genes (Basel) 13(9):1593CrossRefPubMed
4.
5.
go back to reference Luo WQ et al (2019) Predicting breast cancer in breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) ultrasound category 4 or 5 lesions: a nomogram combining radiomics and BI-RADS. Sci Rep 9(1):11921CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Luo WQ et al (2019) Predicting breast cancer in breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) ultrasound category 4 or 5 lesions: a nomogram combining radiomics and BI-RADS. Sci Rep 9(1):11921CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Conti A et al (2021) Radiomics in breast cancer classification and prediction. Semin Cancer Biol 72:238–250CrossRefPubMed Conti A et al (2021) Radiomics in breast cancer classification and prediction. Semin Cancer Biol 72:238–250CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Uygur MM, Gümüş M (2021) The utility of serum tumor markers CEA and CA 15–3 for breast cancer prognosis and their association with clinicopathological parameters. Cancer Treat Res Commun 28:100402CrossRefPubMed Uygur MM, Gümüş M (2021) The utility of serum tumor markers CEA and CA 15–3 for breast cancer prognosis and their association with clinicopathological parameters. Cancer Treat Res Commun 28:100402CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Duffy MJ (2006) Serum tumor markers in breast cancer: are they of clinical value? Clin Chem 52(3):345–351CrossRefPubMed Duffy MJ (2006) Serum tumor markers in breast cancer: are they of clinical value? Clin Chem 52(3):345–351CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Charkhchi P et al (2020) CA125 and ovarian cancer: a comprehensive review. Cancers (Basel) 12(12):3730CrossRefPubMed Charkhchi P et al (2020) CA125 and ovarian cancer: a comprehensive review. Cancers (Basel) 12(12):3730CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Behl A et al (2023) Monoclonal antibodies in breast cancer: a critical appraisal. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 183:103915CrossRefPubMed Behl A et al (2023) Monoclonal antibodies in breast cancer: a critical appraisal. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 183:103915CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Clinical practice guidelines for the use of tumor markers in breast and colorectal cancer (1996) Adopted on May 17, 1996 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol 14(10):2843–2877CrossRef Clinical practice guidelines for the use of tumor markers in breast and colorectal cancer (1996) Adopted on May 17, 1996 by the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol 14(10):2843–2877CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Lauro S et al (1999) Comparison of CEA, MCA, CA 15–3 and CA 27–29 in follow-up and monitoring therapeutic response in breast cancer patients. Anticancer Res 19(4c):3511–3515PubMed Lauro S et al (1999) Comparison of CEA, MCA, CA 15–3 and CA 27–29 in follow-up and monitoring therapeutic response in breast cancer patients. Anticancer Res 19(4c):3511–3515PubMed
13.
go back to reference Puglisi F et al (2014) Follow-up of patients with early breast cancer: is it time to rewrite the story? Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 91(2):130–141CrossRefPubMed Puglisi F et al (2014) Follow-up of patients with early breast cancer: is it time to rewrite the story? Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 91(2):130–141CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Golestan A et al (2024) Unveiling promising breast cancer biomarkers: an integrative approach combining bioinformatics analysis and experimental verification. BMC Cancer 24(1):155CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Golestan A et al (2024) Unveiling promising breast cancer biomarkers: an integrative approach combining bioinformatics analysis and experimental verification. BMC Cancer 24(1):155CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Sanyal R et al (2017) MS4A4A: a novel cell surface marker for M2 macrophages and plasma cells. Immunol Cell Biol 95(7):611–619CrossRefPubMed Sanyal R et al (2017) MS4A4A: a novel cell surface marker for M2 macrophages and plasma cells. Immunol Cell Biol 95(7):611–619CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Malley A et al (1988) Flow cytometric analysis of I-J expression on murine bone marrow-derived macrophages. J Leukoc Biol 43(6):557–565CrossRefPubMed Malley A et al (1988) Flow cytometric analysis of I-J expression on murine bone marrow-derived macrophages. J Leukoc Biol 43(6):557–565CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Japink D et al (2014) Reproducibility studies for experimental epitope detection in macrophages (EDIM). J Immunol Methods 407:40–47CrossRefPubMed Japink D et al (2014) Reproducibility studies for experimental epitope detection in macrophages (EDIM). J Immunol Methods 407:40–47CrossRefPubMed
18.
19.
go back to reference Saman S et al (2020) Biomarkers Apo10 and TKTL1: epitope-detection in monocytes (EDIM) as a new diagnostic approach for cholangiocellular, pancreatic and colorectal carcinoma. Cancer Biomark 27(1):129–137CrossRefPubMed Saman S et al (2020) Biomarkers Apo10 and TKTL1: epitope-detection in monocytes (EDIM) as a new diagnostic approach for cholangiocellular, pancreatic and colorectal carcinoma. Cancer Biomark 27(1):129–137CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Stagno MJ et al (2022) Epitope detection in monocytes (EDIM) for liquid biopsy including identification of GD2 in childhood neuroblastoma-a pilot study. Br J Cancer 127(7):1324–1331CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Stagno MJ et al (2022) Epitope detection in monocytes (EDIM) for liquid biopsy including identification of GD2 in childhood neuroblastoma-a pilot study. Br J Cancer 127(7):1324–1331CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
21.
go back to reference Xie C, Huang Q, Liu Y (2023) Utility of peripheral blood macrophage factor Apo10 and TKTL1 as markers in distinguishing malignant from benign lung nodules: a protocol for a prospective cohort study in Southern China. BMJ Open 13(11):e076573CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Xie C, Huang Q, Liu Y (2023) Utility of peripheral blood macrophage factor Apo10 and TKTL1 as markers in distinguishing malignant from benign lung nodules: a protocol for a prospective cohort study in Southern China. BMJ Open 13(11):e076573CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
22.
go back to reference Xie C et al (2023) Apo10 and TKTL1 in blood macrophages as biomarkers for differentiating lung cancer from benign lung lesions: a comparative study with conventional biomarkers. Cell Oncol (Dordr) 46(6):1725–1729CrossRefPubMed Xie C et al (2023) Apo10 and TKTL1 in blood macrophages as biomarkers for differentiating lung cancer from benign lung lesions: a comparative study with conventional biomarkers. Cell Oncol (Dordr) 46(6):1725–1729CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Coy JF (2017) EDIM-TKTL1/Apo10 blood test: an innate immune system based liquid biopsy for the early detection, characterization and targeted treatment of cancer. Int J Mol Sci 18(4):878CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Coy JF (2017) EDIM-TKTL1/Apo10 blood test: an innate immune system based liquid biopsy for the early detection, characterization and targeted treatment of cancer. Int J Mol Sci 18(4):878CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Hao S et al (2022) The role of transketolase in human cancer progression and therapy. Biomed Pharmacother 154:113607CrossRefPubMed Hao S et al (2022) The role of transketolase in human cancer progression and therapy. Biomed Pharmacother 154:113607CrossRefPubMed
25.
go back to reference Grimm M et al (2016) Monitoring carcinogenesis in a case of oral squamous cell carcinoma using a panel of new metabolic blood biomarkers as liquid biopsies. Oral Maxillofac Surg 20(3):295–302CrossRefPubMed Grimm M et al (2016) Monitoring carcinogenesis in a case of oral squamous cell carcinoma using a panel of new metabolic blood biomarkers as liquid biopsies. Oral Maxillofac Surg 20(3):295–302CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Apo10 and TKTL1 in blood macrophages as potential biomarkers for early diagnosis of operable breast cancer
Authors
Minqing Wu
Qiyu Huang
Lijuan Zhang
Yuying Liu
Musheng Zeng
Chuanbo Xie
Publication date
07-12-2024
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Breast Cancer Research and Treatment
Print ISSN: 0167-6806
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7217
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-024-07569-3

Elevate your expertise in aplastic anemia (Link opens in a new window)

Transform the way you care for your patients with aplastic anemia with our 3-module series using real-world case studies and expert insights. Discover why early diagnosis matters, explore the benefits and risks of current treatments, and develop tailored approaches for complex cases. 

Supported by:
  • Pfizer
Developed by: Springer Healthcare IME
Learn more
SPONSORED

Recent advances in the use of CAR T-cell therapies in relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and follicular lymphoma

In this webinar, Professor Martin Dreyling and an esteemed international panel of CAR T-cell therapy experts discuss the latest data on the safety, efficacy, and clinical impact of CAR T-cell therapies in the treatment of r/r DLBCL and r/r FL.

Please note, this webinar is not intended for healthcare professionals based in the US and UK.

Sponsored by:
  • Novartis Pharma AG
Chaired by: Prof. Martin Dreyling
Developed by: Springer Healthcare
Watch now
Video