Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Anesthesiology Cardiology Dermatology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology General Medicine Geriatrics Hematology Infectious Diseases Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Obstetrics and Gynecology Oncology Pediatrics Psychiatry Radiology Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery Urology
Congress Coverage
2024 ESMO Congress 2024 ERS Congress 2024 EASD Congress 2024 ESC Congress 2024 EAN Congress 2024 ASCO Annual Meeting 2024 ACC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

EASD 2024

Keep up to date with the top stories from the 60th EASD Annual Meeting with our congress hub page.
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -)

26-12-2023 | Original Article

Breaking barriers: exploring physiotherapists’ willingness and challenges in embracing telerehabilitation in a developing country

Authors: Sinem Erturan, Mustafa Burak, Bülent Elbasan

Published in: Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) | Issue 3/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Telerehabilitation (TR) is an innovative approach that can address the limited availability and restricted access to rehabilitation services, particularly during challenging times such as pandemics and natural disasters. This study focuses on understanding the desires, perceptions, and barriers that physiotherapists face when implementing TR in a developing country.

Method

The study was conducted with 219 physiotherapists residing in a developing country using a web-based survey on Google Docs.

Result

The findings revealed that a significant majority of physiotherapists (88.1%) recognized TR as a potential solution for individuals with physical problems during the pandemic. Additionally, 89.5% expressed satisfaction with the opportunity to receive consultations from different hospitals, indicating a positive perception of TR. However, the study also highlighted certain barriers that hindered the implementation of TR. Around 40.2% of physiotherapists reported having training deficiencies, suggesting a need for educational support in utilizing TR effectively. Furthermore, the analysis of demographic factors revealed interesting insights. It was noteworthy that the age and years of experience of physiotherapists had an impact on their willingness and adoption of TR.

Conclusion

The study reveals that physiotherapists in the developing country exhibit a positive attitude towards TR and recognize its potential benefits. However, various barriers, such as training deficiencies, need to be addressed to facilitate a broader adoption of TR in their practices. Overcoming these barriers is anticipated to heighten physiotherapists’ readiness to embrace TR, ultimately enhancing the accessibility and delivery of rehabilitation services.
Literature
1.
World Health Organization (2015) World report on ageing and health. World Health Organization
2.
Greathouse DG et al (2020) Primary care team: now and beyond in physical therapy. St. Louis, MO, USA: Elsevier Saunders
3.
Falvey JR et al (2020) Home health rehabilitation utilization among Medicare beneficiaries following critical illness. J Am Geriatr Soc 68(7):1512–1519CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
4.
Deslauriers S et al (2021) Effects of waiting for outpatient physiotherapy services in persons with musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil 43(5):611–620CrossRefPubMed
5.
Rau C-L et al (2013) Low-cost tele-assessment system for home-based evaluation of reaching ability following stroke. Telemedicine and e-Health 19(12):973–978CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
Cox NS et al (2021) Telerehabilitation for chronic respiratory disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1)
7.
Rogante M et al (2010) Ten years of telerehabilitation: a literature overview of technologies and clinical applications. NeuroRehabilitation 27(4):287–304CrossRefPubMed
8.
Albahrouh SI, Buabbas AJ (2021) Physiotherapists’ perceptions of and willingness to use telerehabilitation in Kuwait during the COVID-19 pandemic. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak 21(1):1–12CrossRef
9.
10.
Agostini M et al (2015) Telerehabilitation and recovery of motor function: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Telemed Telecare 21(4):202–213CrossRefPubMed
11.
Rogante M et al (2015) A quality assessment of systematic reviews on telerehabilitation: what does the evidence tell us? Annali dell’Istituto superiore di sanita 51:11–18PubMed
12.
13.
Bird KT, Murphy RL Jr (1974) Telediagnosis: a new community health resource. Am J Public Health 64(2)
14.
McCue M, Fairman A, Pramuka M (2010) Enhancing quality of life through telerehabilitation. Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinics 21(1):195–205PubMed
15.
Fook VFS et al (2008) Innovative platform for tele-physiotherapy. in HealthCom 2008–10th International Conference on e-health Networking, Applications and Services. IEEE
16.
Turolla A et al (2020) Musculoskeletal physical therapy during the COVID-19 pandemic: is telerehabilitation the answer? Phys Ther 100(8):1260–1264CrossRefPubMed
17.
Buvik A et al (2019) Cost-effectiveness of telemedicine in remote orthopedic consultations: randomized controlled trial. J Med Internet Res 21(2):e11330CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
18.
Dicianno BE et al (2015) Perspectives on the evolution of mobile (mHealth) technologies and application to rehabilitation. Phys Ther 95(3):397–405CrossRefPubMed
19.
Mani S et al (2017) Validity and reliability of Internet-based physiotherapy assessment for musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare 23(3):379–391CrossRefPubMed
20.
World Health Organization (2020) COVID-19: operational guidance for maintaining essential health services during an outbreak: interim guidance, 25 March 2020. World Health Organization
21.
Kichloo A et al (2020) Telemedicine, the current COVID-19 pandemic and the future: a narrative review and perspectives moving forward in the USA. Fami Med Commun Health  8(3)
22.
Kocyigit BF (2023) Rehabilitation needs after earthquakes. J Kor Med Sci 38(17)
23.
Quigley A, Johnson H, McArthur C (2021) Transforming the provision of physiotherapy in the time of COVID-19: a call to action for telerehabilitation. University of Toronto Press 1–2
24.
Alpalhão V, Alpalhão M (2020) Impact of COVID-19 on physical therapist practice in Portugal. Phys Ther
25.
Buabbas A (2013) Investigation of the adoption of telemedicine technology in the Kuwaiti health system: strategy and policy of implementation for overseas referral patients. Brunel University, School of Information Systems, Computing and Mathematics
26.
Saaei F, Klappa SG (2021) Rethinking telerehabilitation: attitudes of physical therapists and patients. J Patient Exp 8:23743735211034336
27.
Bican R et al (2021) Rapid implementation of telerehabilitation for pediatric patients during COVID-19. Int J Telerehab  13(1)
28.
Bennell KL et al (2021) Physiotherapists and patients report positive experiences overall with telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic: a mixed-methods study. J Physiother 67(3):201–209CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
Cottrell MA et al (2018) Clinicians’ perspectives of a novel home-based multidisciplinary telehealth service for patients with chronic spinal pain. Int J Telerehab 10(2):81CrossRef
30.
Odole AC et al (2015) Tele-physiotherapy in Nigeria: perceived challenges by physiotherapists to its implementation. Int J Telemed Clin Pract 1(2):186–196
31.
LeRouge C, Garfield MJ (2013) Crossing the telemedicine chasm: have the US barriers to widespread adoption of telemedicine been significantly reduced? Int J Environ Res Public Health 10(12):6472–6484CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
Association AT (2020) ATA’s quick-start guide to telehealth during a health crisis
33.
Aloyuni S et al (2020) Knowledge, attitude, and barriers to telerehabilitation-based physical therapy practice in Saudi Arabia. in Healthcare. Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute
34.
Cottrell MA, Russell TG (2020) Telehealth for musculoskeletal physiotherapy. Musculoskeletal Science and Practice 48:102193CrossRefPubMed
35.
Morris J et al (2019) Clinician perspectives on mRehab interventions and technologies for people with disabilities in the United States: a national survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16(21):4220CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
36.
Ahmed MH et al (2021) Willingness to use telemedicine during COVID-19 among health professionals in a low income country. Informatics in Medicine Unlocked 27:100783CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
37.
Das N et al (2020) Attitude to telemedicine in the times of COVID 19 pandemic: opinion of medical practitioners from India. Psych Clin Neurosci
38.
Schinasi DA et al (2021) Attitudes and perceptions of telemedicine in response to the COVID-19 pandemic: a survey of naïve healthcare providers. Front Pediatr 9:257CrossRef
39.
Reicher S, Sela T, Toren O (2021) Using telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic: attitudes of adult health care consumers in Israel. Front Public Health 9
40.
Testa M, Rossettini G (2016) Enhance placebo, avoid nocebo: how contextual factors affect physiotherapy outcomes. Man Ther 24:65–74CrossRefPubMed
41.
Malliaras P et al (2021) ‘It’s not hands-on therapy, so it’s very limited’: telehealth use and views among allied health clinicians during the coronavirus pandemic. Musculoskel Sci Pract 52
42.
Rausch A-K et al (2021) Physiotherapists’ use and perceptions of digital remote physiotherapy during COVID-19 lockdown in Switzerland: an online cross-sectional survey. Archives Physiother 11(1):1–10
43.
Scott Kruse C et al (2018) Evaluating barriers to adopting telemedicine worldwide: a systematic review. J Telemed Telecare 24(1):4–12CrossRefPubMed
44.
Rao SS et al (2020) Establishing telemedicine in an academic total joint arthroplasty practice: needs and opportunities highlighted by the COVID-19 pandemic. Arthroplasty today 6(3):617–622CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
45.
Thapa S et al (2021) Willingness to use digital health tools in patient care among health care professionals and students at a University Hospital in Saudi Arabia: quantitative cross-sectional survey. JMIR medical education 7(1):e18590CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
46.
Cottrell MA et al (2017) Service provider perceptions of telerehabilitation as an additional service delivery option within an Australian neurosurgical and orthopaedic physiotherapy screening clinic: a qualitative study. Musculoskel Sci Pract 32:7–16CrossRef
47.
Edirippulige S, Armfield N (2017) Education and training to support the use of clinical telehealth: a review of the literature. J Telemed Telecare 23(2):273–282CrossRefPubMed
48.
Signal N et al (2020) Implementation of telerehabilitation in response to COVID-19: lessons learnt from neurorehabilitation clinical practice and education. NZ J Physiother 48:117–126
49.
Hennemann S, Beutel ME, Zwerenz R (2017) Ready for eHealth? Health professionals’ acceptance and adoption of eHealth interventions in inpatient routine care. J Health Commun 22(3):274–284CrossRefPubMed
50.
Stanhope J, Weinstein P (2020) Learning from COVID-19 to improve access to physiotherapy. Aust J Prim Health 26(4):271–272CrossRefPubMed
51.
Wade VA, Eliott JA, Hiller JE (2014) Clinician acceptance is the key factor for sustainable telehealth services. Qual Health Res 24(5):682–694CrossRefPubMed
52.
Russell TG et al (2003) Low-bandwidth telerehabilitation for patients who have undergone total knee replacement: preliminary results. J telemed Telecare 9(2_suppl):44–47
53.
Hailey D et al (2010) Evidence on the effectiveness of telerehabilitation applications. Inst Health Econom
54.
Duckett S (2020) What should primary care look like after the COVID-19 pandemic? Aust J Prim Health 26(3):207–211CrossRefPubMed
55.
Lin C-CC et al (2018) Telehealth in health centers: key adoption factors, barriers, and opportunities. Health Aff 37(12):1967–1974CrossRef
56.
Howard IM, Kaufman MS (2018) Telehealth applications for outpatients with neuromuscular or musculoskeletal disorders. Muscle Nerve 58(4):475–485CrossRefPubMed
57.
Tousignant M et al (2011) Patients’ satisfaction of healthcare services and perception with in-home telerehabilitation and physiotherapists’ satisfaction toward technology for post-knee arthroplasty: an embedded study in a randomized trial. Telemedicine and e-Health 17(5):376–382CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Breaking barriers: exploring physiotherapists’ willingness and challenges in embracing telerehabilitation in a developing country
Authors
Sinem Erturan
Mustafa Burak
Bülent Elbasan
Publication date
26-12-2023
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Irish Journal of Medical Science (1971 -) / Issue 3/2024
Print ISSN: 0021-1265
Electronic ISSN: 1863-4362
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-023-03589-y

2024 ESC Congress

Noise pollution dangerous for heart health

Two studies underscore the adverse impact of noise pollution on the risk for and prognosis after myocardial infarction.

Read more

Post-TAVI follow up: deploying virtual assistants

Antihypertensives: more effective at morning or night?

Low Lp(a) levels unlikely to increase the risk of diabetes

» View more highlights on the 2024 ESC Congress hub page

A quick guide to ECGs

Improve your ECG interpretation skills with this comprehensive, rapid, interactive course. Expert advice provides detailed feedback as you work through 50 ECGs covering the most common cardiac presentations to ensure your practice stays up to date. 

PD Dr. Carsten W. Israel
Developed by: Springer Medizin
Start the cases

At a glance: The STEP trials

A round-up of the STEP phase 3 clinical trials evaluating semaglutide for weight loss in people with overweight or obesity.

Developed by: Springer Medicine
Read more
Image Credits