Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Anesthesiology Cardiology Dermatology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology General Medicine Geriatrics Hematology Infectious Diseases Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Obstetrics and Gynecology Oncology Pediatrics Psychiatry Radiology Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery Urology
Congress Coverage
ASH 2024 Annual Meeting 2024 ESMO Congress 2024 ERS Congress 2024 EASD Congress 2024 ESC Congress 2024 EAN Congress 2024 ASCO Annual Meeting 2024 ACC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote series | Spotlight on menopause

Menopause can have a significant impact on the body, with effects ranging beyond the endocrine and reproductive systems. Learn about the systemic effects of menopause, so you can help patients in your clinics through the transition.

Published: Thursday 12th December 2024
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Health Services Research
Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Back Pain | Research

Physiotherapists as first-contact practitioners for patients with low back pain in French primary care: a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial

Authors: Amélie Kechichian, François Desmeules, Pauline Girard, Hugo Terrisse, Céline Vermorel, Nicolas Pinsault

Published in: BMC Health Services Research | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

A new model of care enables French physiotherapists (PT) working in collaboration with family physicians (FP) to expand their usual scope of practice for patients with acute low back pain (LBP). The aim of our study is to evaluate the impact of this new first-contact physiotherapy (FCP) advanced practice model compared to usual FP care.

Methods

A multicentre pragmatic non-inferiority cluster randomised controlled trial (RCT) has been conducted in six multidisciplinary primary healthcare centres in France. Patients from 20 to 55 years old with acute LBP consulted either the PT or the FP. PT independently assessed and managed patients including medication prescription. The primary outcome measure was disability at six weeks (Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire, range 0–24). Secondary outcomes include pain, risk disability prognosis, satisfaction with care, healthcare resources use and wait times. Data were collected at baseline, six and twelve weeks. Outcomes across arms were compared using mixed models regression analysis. Except for non-inferiority analysis of the primary outcome measure, other analyses were performed with a two-sided significance level of 0.05.

Results

Sixty patients were recruited (PT: 32, FP: 28). The adjusted mean difference between groups for disability at 6 weeks was 0.39 in favour of the FP group (95%CI: -2.03; 2.81, p = 0.753). Considering a 5 points minimal clinically important difference, the FCP-led model of care was not inferior to usual FP care for the primary outcome. There was no statistically significant difference between groups in disability at 3 months and pain at 6 weeks and 3 months. PTs prescribed significantly less medications than FPs (p < 0.001). No statistically significant difference was found for other healthcare resource use outcomes, patients’ satisfaction and wait times.

Conclusion

This is the first RCT to evaluate the impact of a FCP advanced practice model of care including medical delegated acts in a primary care setting. Our results suggest that the FCP-led model of care is not inferior to usual FP care regarding disability at 6 weeks. The FCP model could result in possible benefits in terms of healthcare resources use. Further adequate powered studies with larger sample size are needed to draw stronger conclusions.

Trial registration

The study has been registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT05200533) on the 20th of January 2022.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
Cieza A, Causey K, Kamenov K, Hanson SW, Chatterji S, Vos T. Global estimates of the need for rehabilitation based on the Global Burden of Disease study 2019: a systematic analysis for the global burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet. 2020;396(10267):2006–17.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
3.
Woolf AD, Erwin J, March L. The need to address the burden of musculoskeletal conditions. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2012;26(2):183–224.PubMedCrossRef
4.
Haute Autorité de Santé. Prise en charge Du patient présentant une lombalgie commune. Saint-Denis La Plaine: HAS; 2019.
5.
Haute Autorité de Santé. Prise en charge Du patient présentant une lombalgie commune. Récommandation De bonne pratique. Saint-Denis La Plaine; 2019.
6.
Lapinte A, Legendre B. Renoncement aux soins: la faible densité médicale est un facteur aggravant pour les personnes pauvres. Études et résultats, DREES. 2021;1200.
7.
Anguis M, Bergeat M, Pisarik J, Vergier N, Chaput H. Quelle démographie récente et à venir pour les professions médicales et pharmaceutique? Constat et projections démographiques. 2021.
8.
Chevillard G, Lucas-Gabrielli V, Mousques J. «Déserts médicaux» en France: état des lieux et perspectives de recherches. LEspace Geographique. 2018;47(4):362–80.CrossRef
9.
10.
Babatunde OO, Bishop A, Cottrell E, Jordan JL, Corp N, Humphries K, et al. A systematic review and evidence synthesis of non-medical triage, self-referral and direct access services for patients with musculoskeletal pain. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(7):e0235364.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
11.
Demont A, Bourmaud A, Kechichian A, Desmeules F. The impact of direct access physiotherapy compared to primary care physician led usual care for patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of the literature. Disabil Rehabil. 2019:1–12.
12.
Maselli F, Piano L, Cecchetto S, Storari L, Rossettini G, Mourad F. Direct access to physical therapy: should italy move forward? Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(1):555.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
13.
Ojha HA, Wyrsta NJ, Davenport TE, Egan WE, Gellhorn AC. Timing of Physical Therapy Initiation for Nonsurgical Management of Musculoskeletal Disorders and effects on patient outcomes: a systematic review. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016;46(2):56–70.PubMedCrossRef
14.
Childs JD, Fritz JM, Wu SS, Flynn TW, Wainner RS, Robertson EK, et al. Implications of early and guideline adherent physical therapy for low back pain on utilization and costs. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:150.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
15.
Fritz JM, Magel JS, McFadden M, Asche C, Thackeray A, Meier W, et al. Early physical therapy vs Usual Care in patients with recent-onset low back Pain: a Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015;314(14):1459–67.PubMedCrossRef
16.
Bornhöft L, Thorn J, Svensson M, Nordeman L, Eggertsen R, Larsson MEH. More cost-effective management of patients with musculoskeletal disorders in primary care after direct triaging to physiotherapists for initial assessment compared to initial general practitioner assessment. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2019;20(1):186.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
17.
Goodwin RW, Hendrick PA. Physiotherapy as a first point of contact in general practice: a solution to a growing problem? Prim Health care Res Dev. 2016;17(5):489–502.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Halls S, Thomas R, Stott H, Cupples ME, Kersten P, Cramp F, et al. Provision of first contact physiotherapy in primary care across the UK: a survey of the service. Physiotherapy. 2020;108:2–9.PubMedCrossRef
19.
Caine R, Wynne C. Advanced practitioner physiotherapists in primary care: a new era. Physiotherapy. 2016;102:e142.CrossRef
20.
Donato EB, DuVall RE, Godges JJ, Zimmerman GJ, Greathouse DG. Practice analysis: defining the clinical practice of primary contact physical therapy. J Orthop Sports Phys Therapy. 2004;34(6):284–304.CrossRef
21.
Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. First Contact Physiotherapy posts in General Practice: a guide for implementation in England. Chartred society of physiotherapy; 2018.
22.
World Physiotherapy. Énoncé de politique: pratique de la physiothérapie avancée 2019. 2019.
23.
Vedanayagam M, Buzak M, Reid D, Saywell N. Advanced practice physiotherapists are effective in the management of musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review of systematic reviews. Physiotherapy. 2021;113:116–30.PubMedCrossRef
24.
Matifat E, Méquignon M, Cunningham C, Blake C, Fennelly O, Desmeules F. Benefits of Musculoskeletal Physical Therapy in Emergency departments: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2019;99(9):1150–66.PubMedCrossRef
25.
Desmeules F, Roy JS, MacDermid JC, Champagne F, Hinse O, Woodhouse LJ. Advanced practice physiotherapy in patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a systematic review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2012;13:107.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
26.
Lafrance S, Vincent R, Demont A, Charron M, Desmeules F. Advanced practice physiotherapists can diagnose and triage patients with musculoskeletal disorders while providing effective care: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2023;69(4):220–31.
27.
Lafrance S, Lapalme J-G, Méquignon M, Santaguida C, Fernandes J, Desmeules F. Advanced practice physiotherapy for adults with spinal pain: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Eur Spine J. 2020:1–14.
28.
Thompson J, Yoward S, Dawson P. The role of physiotherapy extended scope practitioners in musculoskeletal care with focus on decision making and clinical outcomes: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative research. Musculoskelet Care. 2017;15(2):91–103.CrossRef
29.
Oakley C, Shacklady C. The clinical effectiveness of the extended-scope physiotherapist role in Musculoskeletal Triage: a systematic review. Musculoskelet Care. 2015;13(4):204–21.CrossRef
30.
Noblet T, Marriott J, Hensman-Crook A, O’Shea S, Friel S, Rushton A. Independent prescribing by advanced physiotherapists for patients with low back pain in primary care: a feasibility trial with an embedded qualitative component. PLoS ONE. 2020;15(3):e0229792.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
31.
Bastiaens F, Barten D-J, Veenhof C. Identifying goals, roles and tasks of extended scope physiotherapy in Dutch primary care-an exploratory, qualitative multi-step study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):1–24.
32.
Mabry LM, Notestine JP, Moore JH, Bleakley CM, Taylor JB. Safety events and privilege utilization rates in Advanced Practice Physical Therapy compared to traditional primary care: an observational study. Mil Med. 2020;185(1–2):e290–7.PubMed
33.
Downie F, McRitchie C, Monteith W, Turner H. Physiotherapist as an alternative to a GP for musculoskeletal conditions: a 2-year service evaluation of UK primary care data. Br J Gen Pract. 2019;69(682):e314–20.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
34.
Ministère des Solidarités. et de la Santé. Pacte de refondation des urgences. 2019.
35.
Hassenteufel P, Naiditch M, Schweyer F-X. Les réformes de l’organisation des soins primaires: perspectives multi-situées. Avant-propos. Revue française des affaires Sociales. 2020(1):11–31.
36.
Haute. Autorité de Santé. Délégation, transfert, nouveaux métiers… Conditions des nouvelles formes de coopération entre professionnels de santé. 2007.
37.
Haute Autorité de Santé. Protocole de coopération entre professionnels de santé (art. 51 de la loi HPST): bilan 2010–2018. 2018.
38.
Ministère des Solidarités et de la Santé. Les protocoles nationaux de coopération. In: Santé MdSedl, editor. 2022.
39.
Fournier C, Bourgeois I, Naiditch M. Action De santé libérale en équipe (Asalée): un espace de transformation des pratiques en soins primaires. Questions d’économie de la santé. 2018;232(8):1–8.
40.
World Health Organization. Task shifting: rational redistribution of tasks among health workforce teams: global recommendations and guidelines. 2007.
41.
42.
Kechichian A, Desmeules F, Girard P, Pinsault N. Acceptability of a task sharing and shifting model between family physicians and physiotherapists in French multidisciplinary primary healthcare centres: a cross-sectional survey. Family Med Community Health. 2022;10(2):e001644.CrossRef
43.
Campbell MK, Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Altman DG. Consort 2010 statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ. 2012;345:e5661.
44.
Piaggio G, Elbourne DR, Pocock SJ, Evans SJ, Altman DG, CONSORT Group ft. Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence randomized trials: extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement. JAMA. 2012;308(24):2594–604.PubMedCrossRef
45.
Moher D, Chan AW. SPIRIT (standard protocol items: recommendations for interventional trials). Guidelines for Reporting Health Research: a user’s manual. 2014:56–67.
46.
Andreoletti F, Maselli F, Storari L, Vongher A, Erbesato M, Testa M, et al. Screening for referral of serious pathology by physical examination tests in patients with back or chest pain: a systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(24):16418.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
47.
Finucane LM, Downie A, Mercer C, Greenhalgh SM, Boissonnault WG, Pool-Goudzwaard AL, et al. International Framework for red flags for potential serious spinal pathologies. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2020;50(7):350–72.PubMedCrossRef
48.
Verhagen AP, Downie A, Popal N, Maher C, Koes BW. Red flags presented in current low back pain guidelines: a review. Eur Spine J. 2016;25(9):2788–802.PubMedCrossRef
49.
Roland M, Fairbank J. The Roland–Morris disability questionnaire and the Oswestry disability questionnaire. Spine. 2000;25(24):3115–24.PubMedCrossRef
50.
Stevens ML, Lin C, Maher CG. The Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire. J Physiotherapy. 2015;62(2):116.CrossRef
51.
Zerkak D, Métivier J-C, Fouquet B, Beaudreuil J. Validation of a French version of Roland–Morris questionnaire in chronic low back pain patients. Annals Phys Rehabilitation Med. 2013;56(9–10):613–20.CrossRef
52.
Hill JC, Whitehurst DG, Lewis M, Bryan S, Dunn KM, Foster NE, et al. Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT back): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet (London England). 2011;378(9802):1560–71.PubMedCrossRef
53.
Cleeland C, Ryan K. Pain assessment: global use of the brief Pain Inventory. Singapore: Annals, Academy of Medicine; 1994.
54.
Lapane KL, Quilliam BJ, Benson C, Chow W, Kim M. One, two, or three? Constructs of the brief pain inventory among patients with non-cancer pain in the outpatient setting. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2014;47(2):325–33.CrossRef
55.
Poundja J, Fikretoglu D, Guay S, Brunet A. Validation of the French version of the brief pain inventory in Canadian veterans suffering from traumatic stress. J Pain Symptom Manag. 2007;33(6):720–6.CrossRef
56.
Dworkin RH, Turk DC, Wyrwich KW, Beaton D, Cleeland CS, Farrar JT, et al. Interpreting the clinical importance of treatment outcomes in chronic pain clinical trials: IMMPACT recommendations. J pain. 2008;9(2):105–21.PubMedCrossRef
57.
Krebs EE, Bair MJ, Damush TM, Tu W, Wu J, Kroenke K. Comparative responsiveness of pain outcome measures among primary care patients with musculoskeletal pain. Med Care. 2010;48(11):1007.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
58.
Beneciuk JM, Bishop MD, Fritz JM, Robinson ME, Asal NR, Nisenzon AN, et al. The STarT back screening tool and individual psychological measures: evaluation of prognostic capabilities for low back pain clinical outcomes in outpatient physical therapy settings. Phys Ther. 2013;93(3):321–33.PubMedCrossRef
59.
60.
Fritz JM, Beneciuk JM, George SZ. Relationship between categorization with the STarT Back Screening Tool and prognosis for people receiving physical therapy for low back pain. Phys Ther. 2011;91(5):722–32.PubMedCrossRef
61.
Bruyère O, Demoulin M, Beaudart C, Hill JC, Maquet D, Genevay S, et al. Validity and reliability of the French version of the STarT back screening tool for patients with low back pain. Spine. 2014;39(2):E123–8.PubMedCrossRef
62.
Beattie P, Turner C, Dowda M, Michener L, Nelson R. The MedRisk instrument for measuring patient satisfaction with physical therapy care: a psychometric analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Therapy. 2005;35(1):24–32.CrossRef
63.
Henschke N, Maher CG, Refshauge KM, Herbert RD, Cumming RG, Bleasel J, et al. Prognosis in patients with recent onset low back pain in Australian primary care: inception cohort study. BMJ. 2008;337:a171.
64.
Chiarotto A, Maxwell LJ, Terwee CB, Wells GA, Tugwell P, Ostelo RW. Roland-Morris disability questionnaire and Oswestry Disability Index: which has better measurement properties for measuring physical functioning in nonspecific low back pain? Systematic review and meta-analysis. Phys Ther. 2016;96(10):1620–37.PubMedCrossRef
65.
Lamb SE, Hansen Z, Lall R, Castelnuovo E, Withers EJ, Nichols V, et al. Group cognitive behavioural treatment for low-back pain in primary care: a randomised controlled trial and cost-effectiveness analysis. Lancet. 2010;375(9718):916–23.PubMedCrossRef
66.
Abraha I, Montedori A. Modified intention to treat reporting in randomised controlled trials: systematic review. BMJ. 2010;340:c2697.
67.
Beurskens AJ, de Vet HC, Van der Heijden G, Knipschild P, Köke A, Lindeman E, et al. Efficacy of traction for non-specific low back pain: a randomised clinical trial. Lancet. 1995;346(8990):1596–600.PubMedCrossRef
68.
Beurskens A, De Vet H, Köke A. Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments. Pain. 1996;65(1):71–6.PubMedCrossRef
69.
Patrick DL, Deyo RA, Atlas SJ, Singer DE, Chapin A, Keller RB. Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with sciatica. Spine. 1995;20(17):1899–908.PubMedCrossRef
70.
Chung AS, Copay AG, Olmscheid N, Campbell D, Walker JB, Chutkan N. Minimum clinically important difference: current trends in the spine literature. Spine. 2017;42(14):1096–105.PubMedCrossRef
71.
Demoulin C, Ostelo R, Knottnerus JA, Smeets RJ. What factors influence the measurement properties of the Roland–Morris disability questionnaire? Eur J Pain. 2010;14(2):200–6.PubMedCrossRef
72.
Stratford PW, Binkley J, Solomon P, Finch E, Gill C, Moreland J. Defining the minimum level of detectable change for the Roland-Morris questionnaire. Phys Ther. 1996;76(4):359–65.PubMedCrossRef
73.
Lauridsen HH, Hartvigsen J, Manniche C, Korsholm L, Grunnet-Nilsson N. Responsiveness and minimal clinically important difference for pain and disability instruments in low back pain patients. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2006;7(1):1–16.CrossRef
74.
Ostelo RW, Deyo RA, Stratford P, Waddell G, Croft P, Von Korff M, et al. Interpreting change scores for pain and functional status in low back pain: towards international consensus regarding minimal important change. Spine. 2008;33(1):90–4.PubMedCrossRef
75.
Hill JC, Whitehurst DGT, Lewis M, Bryan S, Dunn KM, Foster NE, et al. Comparison of stratified primary care management for low back pain with current best practice (STarT back): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011;378(9802):1560–71.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
76.
Bornhoft L, Larsson ME, Nordeman L, Eggertsen R, Thorn J. Health effects of direct triaging to physiotherapists in primary care for patients with musculoskeletal disorders: a pragmatic randomized controlled trial. Ther Adv Musculoskelet Dis. 2019;11:1759720X19827504.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
77.
Peterson G, PortstrÖm M, Frick J. Extended roles in primary care when physiotherapist-initiated referral to X-ray can save time and reduce costs. Int J Qual Health Care. 2021;33(3):mzab122.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
78.
Lipman PD, Loudon K, Dluzak L, Moloney R, Messner D, Stoney CM. Framing the conversation: use of PRECIS-2 ratings to advance understanding of pragmatic trial design domains. Trials. 2017;18(1):1–12.CrossRef
79.
Thorpe KE, Zwarenstein M, Oxman AD, Treweek S, Furberg CD, Altman DG, et al. A pragmatic–explanatory continuum indicator summary (PRECIS): a tool to help trial designers. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62(5):464–75.PubMedCrossRef
80.
Christley RM. Power and error: increased risk of false positive results in underpowered studies. Open Epidemiol J. 2010;3(1):16–9.
81.
Halpern SD, Karlawish JH, Berlin JA. The continuing unethical conduct of underpowered clinical trials. JAMA. 2002;288(3):358–62.PubMedCrossRef
82.
Jochen H, Max H, Tamara B, Wilfried L. Multiple imputation of missing data: a simulation study on a binary response. Open Journal of Statistics. 2013;2013.
83.
84.
Draak T, De Greef B, Faber C, Merkies I, Group PS. The minimum clinically important difference: which direction to take. Eur J Neurol. 2019;26(6):850–5.PubMedCrossRef
85.
Bloom DA, Kaplan DJ, Mojica E, Strauss EJ, Gonzalez-Lomas G, Campbell KA, et al. The minimal clinically important difference: a review of clinical significance. Am J Sports Med. 2023;51(2):520–4.PubMedCrossRef
86.
Wright A, Hannon J, Hegedus EJ, Kavchak AE. Clinimetrics corner: a closer look at the minimal clinically important difference (MCID). J Man Manipulative Therapy. 2012;20(3):160–6.CrossRef
87.
Pellekooren S, Donker M, Reijnders E, Boutalab L, Ostelo R, van Tulder M, et al. The introduction of advanced practice physiotherapy within Dutch primary care is a quest for possibilities, added value, and mutual trust: a qualitative study amongst advanced practice physiotherapists and general practitioners. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022;22(1):529.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Physiotherapists as first-contact practitioners for patients with low back pain in French primary care: a pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial
Authors
Amélie Kechichian
François Desmeules
Pauline Girard
Hugo Terrisse
Céline Vermorel
Nicolas Pinsault
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Health Services Research / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1472-6963
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-024-11814-2

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Breast cancer screening among Medicare Advantage enrollees with dementia

Modelling the cost-effectiveness and budget impact of pay-for-performance programs in health care

  • Open Access
  • Research

How well prepared are hospitals for future crises? Board members perceive their hospitals as resilient for acute crises

Let this be a safe place: a qualitative study into midwifery care for forcibly displaced women in the Netherlands

  • Open Access
  • Research

Effective strategies for Fecal Immunochemical Tests (FIT) programs to improve colorectal cancer screening uptake among populations with limited access to the healthcare system: a rapid review

Challenges and executive requirements of advanced health system governance based on general health policies in Iran: qualitative research

  • Open Access
  • Research