Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

04-01-2024 | Assisted Reproduction | Assisted Reproduction Technologies

Exploring attitudes and experiences with reproductive genetic carrier screening among couples seeking medically assisted reproduction: a longitudinal survey study

Authors: Eva Van Steijvoort, Mathilde Cassou, Camille De Schutter, Eftychia Dimitriadou, Hilde Peeters, Karen Peeraer, Gert Matthijs, Pascal Borry

Published in: Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics | Issue 2/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to assess the attitudes and experiences of subfertile couples applying for medically assisted reproduction (MAR) using their own gametes towards reproductive genetic carrier screening (RGCS) for monogenic conditions.

Methods

A prospective survey study was conducted where subfertile couples were recruited from the fertility centre of a university hospital in Flanders, Belgium. Participants were offered RGCS free of charge and completed self-administered questionnaires at three different time points.

Results

The study sample consisted of 26 couples. Most participants had no children, did not consider themselves as religious, and had some form of higher education. Overall, attitudes towards RGCS were mostly positive and the intention to participate in RGCS was high. Anxiety scores were only elevated and clinically relevant for a limited number of participants. A large proportion of participants would consider preventive reproductive options like prenatal diagnosis or in vitro fertilization (IVF)/intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) combined with pre-implantation genetic testing for monogenic conditions (PGT-M) in the event of an increased likelihood of conceiving a child with a hereditary condition. Participants were satisfied with their decision to undergo RGCS, and the majority would recommend RGCS to other couples.

Conclusion

Our study findings suggest that subfertile couples applying for MAR using their own gametes find RGCS acceptable and have a positive attitude towards it. This study provides valuable insights into the perspectives of these couples, highlighting the need for appropriate counseling and timely information provision.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Chokoshvili D, Vears D, Borry P. Expanded carrier screening for monogenic disorders: where are we now? Prenat Diagn. 2018;38(1):59–66.CrossRefPubMed Chokoshvili D, Vears D, Borry P. Expanded carrier screening for monogenic disorders: where are we now? Prenat Diagn. 2018;38(1):59–66.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference de Wert G, van der Hout S, Goddijn M, Vassena R, Frith L, Vermeulen N, et al. The ethics of preconception expanded carrier screening in patients seeking assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod Open. 2021;2021(1):hoaa063.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral de Wert G, van der Hout S, Goddijn M, Vassena R, Frith L, Vermeulen N, et al. The ethics of preconception expanded carrier screening in patients seeking assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod Open. 2021;2021(1):hoaa063.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
3.
go back to reference Larsen D, Ma J, Strassberg M, Ramakrishnan R, Van den Veyver IB. The uptake of panethnic expanded carrier screening is higher when offered during preconception or early prenatal genetic counseling. Prenat Diagn. 2019;39(4):319–23.CrossRefPubMed Larsen D, Ma J, Strassberg M, Ramakrishnan R, Van den Veyver IB. The uptake of panethnic expanded carrier screening is higher when offered during preconception or early prenatal genetic counseling. Prenat Diagn. 2019;39(4):319–23.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Franasiak JM, Olcha M, Bergh PA, Hong KH, Werner MD, Forman EJ, et al. Expanded carrier screening in an infertile population: how often is clinical decision making affected? Genet Med. 2016;18(11):1097–101.CrossRefPubMed Franasiak JM, Olcha M, Bergh PA, Hong KH, Werner MD, Forman EJ, et al. Expanded carrier screening in an infertile population: how often is clinical decision making affected? Genet Med. 2016;18(11):1097–101.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference McQueen DB, Warren CM, Xiao AH, Shulman LP, Jain T. Disparities among infertility patients regarding genetic carrier screening, sex selection, and gene editing. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38(9):2319–25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral McQueen DB, Warren CM, Xiao AH, Shulman LP, Jain T. Disparities among infertility patients regarding genetic carrier screening, sex selection, and gene editing. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2021;38(9):2319–25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Higgins A, Flanagan J, Wald TV, Hansen KA. An expanded carrier screening tool enhances preconception cystic fibrosis screening in infertile couples. Open J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;05(07):5.CrossRef Higgins A, Flanagan J, Wald TV, Hansen KA. An expanded carrier screening tool enhances preconception cystic fibrosis screening in infertile couples. Open J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;05(07):5.CrossRef
7.
go back to reference Pereira N, Wood M, Luong E, Briggs A, Galloway M, Maxwell RA, et al. Expanded genetic carrier screening in clinical practice: a current survey of patient impressions and attitudes. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(4):709–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Pereira N, Wood M, Luong E, Briggs A, Galloway M, Maxwell RA, et al. Expanded genetic carrier screening in clinical practice: a current survey of patient impressions and attitudes. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2019;36(4):709–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Rothwell E, Lamb B, Johnson E, Gurtcheff S, Riches N, Fagan M, et al. Patient perspectives and experiences with in vitro fertilization and genetic testing options. Ther Adv Reprod Health. 2020;14:2633494119899942.PubMedPubMedCentral Rothwell E, Lamb B, Johnson E, Gurtcheff S, Riches N, Fagan M, et al. Patient perspectives and experiences with in vitro fertilization and genetic testing options. Ther Adv Reprod Health. 2020;14:2633494119899942.PubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Pennings G, de Wert G, Shenfield F, Cohen J, et al. ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 13: the welfare of the child in medically assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(10):2585–8.CrossRefPubMed Pennings G, de Wert G, Shenfield F, Cohen J, et al. ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law 13: the welfare of the child in medically assisted reproduction. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(10):2585–8.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Van Steijvoort E, Peeters H, Vandecruys H, Verguts J, Peeraer K, Matthijs G, et al. Exploring informed choice in preconception reproductive genetic carrier screening by using a modified Multidimensional Measure of Informed Choice. Patient Educ Couns. 2022;105(11):3313–8.CrossRefPubMed Van Steijvoort E, Peeters H, Vandecruys H, Verguts J, Peeraer K, Matthijs G, et al. Exploring informed choice in preconception reproductive genetic carrier screening by using a modified Multidimensional Measure of Informed Choice. Patient Educ Couns. 2022;105(11):3313–8.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Van Steijvoort E, Demuynck R, Peeters H, Vandecruys H, Verguts J, Peeraer K, et al. Reasons affecting the uptake of reproductive genetic carrier screening among nonpregnant reproductive-aged women in Flanders (Belgium). J Genet Couns. 2022;31(5):1043–53.CrossRefPubMed Van Steijvoort E, Demuynck R, Peeters H, Vandecruys H, Verguts J, Peeraer K, et al. Reasons affecting the uptake of reproductive genetic carrier screening among nonpregnant reproductive-aged women in Flanders (Belgium). J Genet Couns. 2022;31(5):1043–53.CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference van Dijke I, Lakeman P, Sabiri N, Rusticus H, Ottenheim CPE, Mathijssen IB, et al. Couples’ experiences with expanded carrier screening: evaluation of a university hospital screening offer. Eur J Hum Genet. 2021;29(8):1252–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Dijke I, Lakeman P, Sabiri N, Rusticus H, Ottenheim CPE, Mathijssen IB, et al. Couples’ experiences with expanded carrier screening: evaluation of a university hospital screening offer. Eur J Hum Genet. 2021;29(8):1252–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
14.
go back to reference Birnie E, Schuurmans J, Plantinga M, Abbott KM, Fenwick A, Lucassen A, et al. Couple based expanded carrier screening provided by general practitioners to couples in the Dutch general population: psychological outcomes and reproductive intentions. Genet Med. 2021;23(9):1761–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Birnie E, Schuurmans J, Plantinga M, Abbott KM, Fenwick A, Lucassen A, et al. Couple based expanded carrier screening provided by general practitioners to couples in the Dutch general population: psychological outcomes and reproductive intentions. Genet Med. 2021;23(9):1761–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Schuurmans J, Birnie E, Ranchor AV, Abbott KM, Fenwick A, Lucassen A, et al. GP provided couple-based expanded preconception carrier screening in the Dutch general population: who accepts the test-offer and why? Eur J Hum Genet. 2020;28(2):182–92.CrossRefPubMed Schuurmans J, Birnie E, Ranchor AV, Abbott KM, Fenwick A, Lucassen A, et al. GP provided couple-based expanded preconception carrier screening in the Dutch general population: who accepts the test-offer and why? Eur J Hum Genet. 2020;28(2):182–92.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Kraft SA, Schneider JL, Leo MC, Kauffman TL, Davis JV, Porter KM, et al. Patient actions and reactions after receiving negative results from expanded carrier screening. Clin Genet. 2018;93(5):962–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kraft SA, Schneider JL, Leo MC, Kauffman TL, Davis JV, Porter KM, et al. Patient actions and reactions after receiving negative results from expanded carrier screening. Clin Genet. 2018;93(5):962–71.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Van Steijvoort E, Devolder H, Geysen I, Van Epperzeel S, Peeters H, Peeraer K, et al. Expanded carrier screening in Flanders (Belgium): an online survey on the perspectives of nonpregnant reproductive-aged women. Per Med. 2021;18(4):361–73.CrossRefPubMed Van Steijvoort E, Devolder H, Geysen I, Van Epperzeel S, Peeters H, Peeraer K, et al. Expanded carrier screening in Flanders (Belgium): an online survey on the perspectives of nonpregnant reproductive-aged women. Per Med. 2021;18(4):361–73.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Schuurmans J, Birnie E, van den Heuvel LM, Plantinga M, Lucassen A, van der Kolk DM, et al. Feasibility of couple-based expanded carrier screening offered by general practitioners. Eur J Hum Genet. 2019;27(5):691–700.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Schuurmans J, Birnie E, van den Heuvel LM, Plantinga M, Lucassen A, van der Kolk DM, et al. Feasibility of couple-based expanded carrier screening offered by general practitioners. Eur J Hum Genet. 2019;27(5):691–700.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
19.
go back to reference Lewis C, Hill M, Skirton H, Chitty LS. Development and validation of a measure of informed choice for women undergoing non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016;24(6):809–16.CrossRefPubMed Lewis C, Hill M, Skirton H, Chitty LS. Development and validation of a measure of informed choice for women undergoing non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016;24(6):809–16.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference van den Berg M, Timmermans DR, ten Kate LP, van Vugt JM, van der Wal G. Informed decision making in the context of prenatal screening. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;63(1–2):110–7.CrossRefPubMed van den Berg M, Timmermans DR, ten Kate LP, van Vugt JM, van der Wal G. Informed decision making in the context of prenatal screening. Patient Educ Couns. 2006;63(1–2):110–7.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Marteau TM, Bekker H. The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State—Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Br J Clin Psychol. 1992;31(3):301–6.CrossRefPubMed Marteau TM, Bekker H. The development of a six-item short-form of the state scale of the Spielberger State—Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Br J Clin Psychol. 1992;31(3):301–6.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference van Dijke I, Lakeman P, Sabiri N, Rusticus H, Ottenheim CPE, Mathijssen IB, et al. Couples’ experiences with expanded carrier screening: evaluation of a university hospital screening offer. Eur J Hum Genet. 2021;29(8):1252–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van Dijke I, Lakeman P, Sabiri N, Rusticus H, Ottenheim CPE, Mathijssen IB, et al. Couples’ experiences with expanded carrier screening: evaluation of a university hospital screening offer. Eur J Hum Genet. 2021;29(8):1252–8.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Julian LJ. Measures of anxiety: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety (HADS-A). Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63(S11):S467–72.CrossRef Julian LJ. Measures of anxiety: State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety (HADS-A). Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63(S11):S467–72.CrossRef
24.
25.
go back to reference Archibald AD, McClaren BJ. Perceived relevance of genetic carrier screening: observations of the role of health-related life experiences and stage of life in decision making. J Community Genet. 2012;3(1):47–54.CrossRefPubMed Archibald AD, McClaren BJ. Perceived relevance of genetic carrier screening: observations of the role of health-related life experiences and stage of life in decision making. J Community Genet. 2012;3(1):47–54.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Beulen L, van den Berg M, Faas BH, Feenstra I, Hageman M, van Vugt JM, et al. The effect of a decision aid on informed decision-making in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016;24(10):1409–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Beulen L, van den Berg M, Faas BH, Feenstra I, Hageman M, van Vugt JM, et al. The effect of a decision aid on informed decision-making in the era of non-invasive prenatal testing: a randomised controlled trial. Eur J Hum Genet. 2016;24(10):1409–16.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
27.
go back to reference Bombard Y, Clausen M, Mighton C, Carlsson L, Casalino S, Glogowski E, et al. The Genomics ADvISER: development and usability testing of a decision aid for the selection of incidental sequencing results. Eur J Hum Genet. 2018;26(7):984–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Bombard Y, Clausen M, Mighton C, Carlsson L, Casalino S, Glogowski E, et al. The Genomics ADvISER: development and usability testing of a decision aid for the selection of incidental sequencing results. Eur J Hum Genet. 2018;26(7):984–95.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
28.
go back to reference Halliday JL, Muller C, Charles T, Norris F, Kennedy J, Lewis S, et al. Offering pregnant women different levels of genetic information from prenatal chromosome microarray: a prospective study. Eur J Hum Genet. 2018;26(4):485–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Halliday JL, Muller C, Charles T, Norris F, Kennedy J, Lewis S, et al. Offering pregnant women different levels of genetic information from prenatal chromosome microarray: a prospective study. Eur J Hum Genet. 2018;26(4):485–94.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference King E, Halliday J, Archibald AD, Delatycki M, Barlow-Stewart K, Newson AJ, et al. Development and use of the Australian reproductive genetic carrier screening decision aid. Eur J Hum Genet. 2022;30(2):194–202.CrossRefPubMed King E, Halliday J, Archibald AD, Delatycki M, Barlow-Stewart K, Newson AJ, et al. Development and use of the Australian reproductive genetic carrier screening decision aid. Eur J Hum Genet. 2022;30(2):194–202.CrossRefPubMed
30.
go back to reference Cannon J, Van Steijvoort E, Borry P, Chokoshvili D. How does carrier status for recessive disorders influence reproductive decisions? A systematic review of the literature. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2019;19(12):1117–29.CrossRefPubMed Cannon J, Van Steijvoort E, Borry P, Chokoshvili D. How does carrier status for recessive disorders influence reproductive decisions? A systematic review of the literature. Expert Rev Mol Diagn. 2019;19(12):1117–29.CrossRefPubMed
31.
go back to reference Ghiossi CE, Goldberg JD, Haque IS, Lazarin GA, Wong KK. Clinical utility of expanded carrier screening: reproductive behaviors of at-risk couples. J Genet Couns. 2018;27(3):61625.CrossRef Ghiossi CE, Goldberg JD, Haque IS, Lazarin GA, Wong KK. Clinical utility of expanded carrier screening: reproductive behaviors of at-risk couples. J Genet Couns. 2018;27(3):61625.CrossRef
32.
go back to reference Johansen Taber KA, Beauchamp KA, Lazarin GA, Muzzey D, Arjunan A, Goldberg JD. Clinical utility of expanded carrier screening: results-guided actionability and outcomes. Genet Med. 2019;21(5):1041–8.CrossRefPubMed Johansen Taber KA, Beauchamp KA, Lazarin GA, Muzzey D, Arjunan A, Goldberg JD. Clinical utility of expanded carrier screening: results-guided actionability and outcomes. Genet Med. 2019;21(5):1041–8.CrossRefPubMed
33.
go back to reference Kauffman TL, Irving SA, Leo MC, Gilmore MJ, Himes P, McMullen CK, et al. The NextGen Study: patient motivation for participation in genome sequencing for carrier status. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2017;5(5):508–15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Kauffman TL, Irving SA, Leo MC, Gilmore MJ, Himes P, McMullen CK, et al. The NextGen Study: patient motivation for participation in genome sequencing for carrier status. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2017;5(5):508–15.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
34.
go back to reference Calhaz-Jorge C, De Geyter CH, Kupka MS, Wyns C, Mocanu E, Motrenko T, et al. Survey on ART and IUI: legislation, regulation, funding and registries in European countries: the European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Hum Reprod Open. 2020;2020(1):hoz044.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Calhaz-Jorge C, De Geyter CH, Kupka MS, Wyns C, Mocanu E, Motrenko T, et al. Survey on ART and IUI: legislation, regulation, funding and registries in European countries: the European IVF-monitoring Consortium (EIM) for the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE). Hum Reprod Open. 2020;2020(1):hoz044.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
35.
go back to reference Harper J, Jackson E, Sermon K, Aitken RJ, Harbottle S, Mocanu E, et al. Adjuncts in the IVF laboratory: where is the evidence for ‘add-on’ interventions? Hum Reprod. 2017;32(3):485–91.CrossRefPubMed Harper J, Jackson E, Sermon K, Aitken RJ, Harbottle S, Mocanu E, et al. Adjuncts in the IVF laboratory: where is the evidence for ‘add-on’ interventions? Hum Reprod. 2017;32(3):485–91.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Exploring attitudes and experiences with reproductive genetic carrier screening among couples seeking medically assisted reproduction: a longitudinal survey study
Authors
Eva Van Steijvoort
Mathilde Cassou
Camille De Schutter
Eftychia Dimitriadou
Hilde Peeters
Karen Peeraer
Gert Matthijs
Pascal Borry
Publication date
04-01-2024
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics / Issue 2/2024
Print ISSN: 1058-0468
Electronic ISSN: 1573-7330
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-023-03010-8

Other articles of this Issue 2/2024

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 2/2024 Go to the issue