Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

16-05-2024 | ASO Author Reflections

ASO Author Reflections: The Commission on Cancer’s Role in Quality Procedures that Govern the National Cancer Database

Authors: Bryan E. Palis, MA, Heidi Nelson, MD, FACS

Published in: Annals of Surgical Oncology | Issue 9/2024

Login to get access

Excerpt

The American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer (CoC) has been committed to monitoring cancer practices and improving outcomes since the first cancer registry was established in 1921 by Ernest Amory Codman, M.D., F.A.C.S. Since inception, efforts to enhance the value and utility of the cancer registry have come in the form of standardizing registry definitions, abstraction, and reporting. Since 1988, improvements in the timeliness and accessibility of cancer data has come in the form of registry computerization (i.e., the National Cancer Database; NCDB). Thanks to these efforts, NCDB data not only helps national investigators follow long-term outcomes and longitudinal trends, but also provides hospitals and practitioners with timely reports in support of data-driven practices and quality improvement efforts. Using NCDB to monitor and improve quality of care demands periodic assessment of NCDB data quality. A framework developed by Bray and Parkin is applied to measure NCDB performance and quality.1,2
Literature
1.
go back to reference Bray F, Parkin DM. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods. Part I: comparability, validity and timeliness. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(5):747–55.CrossRef Bray F, Parkin DM. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods. Part I: comparability, validity and timeliness. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(5):747–55.CrossRef
2.
go back to reference Parkin DM, Bray F. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods Part II. Completeness. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(5):756–64.CrossRef Parkin DM, Bray F. Evaluation of data quality in the cancer registry: principles and methods Part II. Completeness. Eur J Cancer. 2009;45(5):756–64.CrossRef
4.
go back to reference Knutson AC, McNamara EJ, McKellar DP, Kaufman CS, Winchester DP. The role of the American College of Surgeons’ cancer program accreditation in influencing oncologic outcomes. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110(5):611–5. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.23680. (Epub 2014 Jul 8 PMID: 25042831).CrossRef Knutson AC, McNamara EJ, McKellar DP, Kaufman CS, Winchester DP. The role of the American College of Surgeons’ cancer program accreditation in influencing oncologic outcomes. J Surg Oncol. 2014;110(5):611–5. https://​doi.​org/​10.​1002/​jso.​23680. (Epub 2014 Jul 8 PMID: 25042831).CrossRef
Metadata
Title
ASO Author Reflections: The Commission on Cancer’s Role in Quality Procedures that Govern the National Cancer Database
Authors
Bryan E. Palis, MA
Heidi Nelson, MD, FACS
Publication date
16-05-2024
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
Annals of Surgical Oncology / Issue 9/2024
Print ISSN: 1068-9265
Electronic ISSN: 1534-4681
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-024-15465-9

Other articles of this Issue 9/2024

Annals of Surgical Oncology 9/2024 Go to the issue
SPONSORED

Mastering chronic pancreatitis pain: A multidisciplinary approach and practical solutions

Webinar | 06-02-2024 | 20:00 (CET)

Severe pain is the most common symptom of chronic pancreatitis. In this webinar, experts share the latest insights in pain management for chronic pancreatitis patients. Experts from a range of disciplines discuss pertinent cases and provide practical suggestions for use within clinical practice.

Sponsored by:
  • Viatris
Developed by: Springer Healthcare
Watch now