Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

07-12-2024 | Artificial Intelligence | Research

RADHawk—an AI-based knowledge recommender to support precision education, improve reporting productivity, and reduce cognitive load

Authors: Julian Lopez-Rippe, Manasa Reddy, Maria Camila Velez-Florez, Raisa Amiruddin, Wondwossen Lerebo, Ami Gokli, Michael Francavilla, Janet Reid

Published in: Pediatric Radiology | Issue 2/2025

Login to get access

Abstract

Background

Using artificial intelligence (AI) to augment knowledge is key to establishing precision education in modern radiology training. Our department has developed a novel AI-derived knowledge recommender, the first reported precision education program in radiology, RADHawk (RH), that augments the training of radiology residents and fellows by pushing personalized and relevant educational content in real-time and in context with the case being interpreted.

Purpose

To assess the impact on trainees of an AI-based knowledge recommender compared to traditional knowledge sourcing for radiology reporting through reporting time, quality, cognitive load, and learning experiences.

Materials and methods

A mixed methods prospective study allocated trainees to intervention and control groups, working with and without access to RH, respectively. Validated questionnaires and observed and graded simulated picture archiving and communication system (PACS)-based reporting at the start and end of a month’s rotation assessed technology acceptance, case report quality, case report time and sourcing time, cognitive load, and attitudes toward modified learning strategies. Non-parametric regression analyses and Mann–Whitney tests were used to compare outcomes between groups, with significance set at P<0.05.

Results

The intervention group (n=28) demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in the case report time by -162 s per case (95%CI -275.76 s to -52.40 s) (P-value = 0.002) and an increase of 14% (95%CI 8.1–19.8%) (P-value <0.001) in accuracy scores compared to the control group (n=29) at the end of the rotation. The intervention group also showed lower levels of mental demand (P=0.030) and experienced less effort (P=0.030) and frustration (P=0.030) while reporting. Additionally, >78% of the intervention group gave positive ratings on RH’s effectiveness, increase in productivity, job usefulness, and ease of use. Eighty-nine percent of participants in the intervention group requested access to RH for their next rotation.

Conclusion

This study demonstrates that RH, as the first reported AI-derived knowledge recommender for radiology education, significantly reduces reporting time and improves reporting accuracy while reducing overall workload and mental demand for radiology trainees. The high acceptance among trainees suggests its potential for supporting self-directed learning. Further testing of a larger external cohort will support more widespread implementation of RH for precision education.

Graphical Abstract

Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Rosenkrantz AB, Hughes DR, Duszak R (2020) Increasing subspecialization of the national radiologist workforce. J Am Coll Radiol 17:812–818CrossRefPubMed Rosenkrantz AB, Hughes DR, Duszak R (2020) Increasing subspecialization of the national radiologist workforce. J Am Coll Radiol 17:812–818CrossRefPubMed
2.
3.
go back to reference Tejani AS (2021) Identifying and addressing barriers to an artificial intelligence curriculum. J Am Coll Radiol 18:605–607CrossRefPubMed Tejani AS (2021) Identifying and addressing barriers to an artificial intelligence curriculum. J Am Coll Radiol 18:605–607CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Wartman SA, Combs CD (2018) Medical education must move from the information age to the age of artificial intelligence. Acad Med 93:1107–1109CrossRefPubMed Wartman SA, Combs CD (2018) Medical education must move from the information age to the age of artificial intelligence. Acad Med 93:1107–1109CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Gokli A, Dayneka JS, Saul DT et al (2021) RADIAL: leveraging a learning management system to support radiology education. Pediatr Radiol 51:1518–1525CrossRefPubMed Gokli A, Dayneka JS, Saul DT et al (2021) RADIAL: leveraging a learning management system to support radiology education. Pediatr Radiol 51:1518–1525CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Hoegger MJ, Shetty AS, Denner DR et al (2021) A snapshot of radiology training during the early COVID-19 pandemic. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 50:607–613CrossRefPubMed Hoegger MJ, Shetty AS, Denner DR et al (2021) A snapshot of radiology training during the early COVID-19 pandemic. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 50:607–613CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Sugi MD, Kennedy TA, Shah V, Hartung MP (2021) Bridging the gap: interactive, case-based learning in radiology education. Abdom Radiol (NY) 46:5503–5508CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Sugi MD, Kennedy TA, Shah V, Hartung MP (2021) Bridging the gap: interactive, case-based learning in radiology education. Abdom Radiol (NY) 46:5503–5508CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
8.
go back to reference Tejani AS, Elhalawani H, Moy L et al (2023) Artificial intelligence and radiology education. Radiol Artif Intell 5:e220084CrossRefPubMed Tejani AS, Elhalawani H, Moy L et al (2023) Artificial intelligence and radiology education. Radiol Artif Intell 5:e220084CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Rainey C, O’Regan T, Matthew J et al (2021) Beauty is in the AI of the beholder: are we ready for the clinical integration of artificial intelligence in radiography? An exploratory analysis of perceived AI knowledge, skills, confidence, and education perspectives of UK radiographers. Front Digit Health 3:739327CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Rainey C, O’Regan T, Matthew J et al (2021) Beauty is in the AI of the beholder: are we ready for the clinical integration of artificial intelligence in radiography? An exploratory analysis of perceived AI knowledge, skills, confidence, and education perspectives of UK radiographers. Front Digit Health 3:739327CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
11.
go back to reference Parasuraman A, Colby CL (2015) An updated and streamlined technology readiness index. J Serv Res 18:59–74CrossRef Parasuraman A, Colby CL (2015) An updated and streamlined technology readiness index. J Serv Res 18:59–74CrossRef
12.
go back to reference van Merriënboer JJG, Sweller J (2010) Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies. Med Educ 44:85–93CrossRefPubMed van Merriënboer JJG, Sweller J (2010) Cognitive load theory in health professional education: design principles and strategies. Med Educ 44:85–93CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Hart SG, Staveland LE (1988) Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Human mental workload. Elsevier, pp 139–183 Hart SG, Staveland LE (1988) Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Human mental workload. Elsevier, pp 139–183
14.
go back to reference Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13:319CrossRef Davis FD (1989) Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q 13:319CrossRef
15.
go back to reference Gokli AA (2022) Teaching and communicating with millennial learners. In: Catanzano T (ed) Image-based teaching. Springer International Publishing, pp 15–31CrossRef Gokli AA (2022) Teaching and communicating with millennial learners. In: Catanzano T (ed) Image-based teaching. Springer International Publishing, pp 15–31CrossRef
16.
go back to reference Back DA, Behringer F, Haberstroh N et al (2016) Learning management system and e-learning tools: an experience of medical students’ usage and expectations. Int J Med Educ 7:267–273CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Back DA, Behringer F, Haberstroh N et al (2016) Learning management system and e-learning tools: an experience of medical students’ usage and expectations. Int J Med Educ 7:267–273CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Credé M, Phillips LA (2011) A meta-analytic review of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Learn Individ Differ 21:337–346CrossRef Credé M, Phillips LA (2011) A meta-analytic review of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Learn Individ Differ 21:337–346CrossRef
18.
go back to reference Cook DA, Thompson WG, Thomas KG (2011) The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire: score validity among medicine residents. Med Educ 45:1230–1240CrossRefPubMed Cook DA, Thompson WG, Thomas KG (2011) The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire: score validity among medicine residents. Med Educ 45:1230–1240CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference AlQudah AA, Al-Emran M, Shaalan K (2021) Technology acceptance in healthcare: a systematic review. Appl Sci 11:10537CrossRef AlQudah AA, Al-Emran M, Shaalan K (2021) Technology acceptance in healthcare: a systematic review. Appl Sci 11:10537CrossRef
Metadata
Title
RADHawk—an AI-based knowledge recommender to support precision education, improve reporting productivity, and reduce cognitive load
Authors
Julian Lopez-Rippe
Manasa Reddy
Maria Camila Velez-Florez
Raisa Amiruddin
Wondwossen Lerebo
Ami Gokli
Michael Francavilla
Janet Reid
Publication date
07-12-2024
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
Pediatric Radiology / Issue 2/2025
Print ISSN: 0301-0449
Electronic ISSN: 1432-1998
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-024-06116-y

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on adolescent vaping

Growing numbers of young people are using e-cigarettes, despite warnings of respiratory effects and addiction. How can doctors tackle the epidemic, and what health effects should you prepare to manage in your clinics?

Prof. Ann McNeill
Dr. Debbie Robson
Benji Horwell
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Watch now
Video