Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Anesthesiology Cardiology Dermatology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology General Medicine Geriatrics Hematology Infectious Diseases Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Obstetrics and Gynecology Oncology Pediatrics Psychiatry Radiology Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery Urology
Congress Coverage
2024 ESMO Congress 2024 ERS Congress 2024 EASD Congress 2024 ESC Congress 2024 EAN Congress 2024 ASCO Annual Meeting 2024 ACC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote series | Spotlight on menopause

Menopause can have a significant impact on the body, with effects ranging beyond the endocrine and reproductive systems. Learn about the systemic effects of menopause, so you can help patients in your clinics through the transition.

Launching: Thursday 12th December 2024
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders
Published in:

Open Access 01-12-2024 | Arterial Diseases | Case Report

Coronary Artery Disease Empowerment Scale (CADES): Persian translation and psychometric properties

Authors: Amir Jalali, Amirhossein Naghibzadeh, Mojgan Rostami, Yasin Ahmadi, Mahbod Khodamorovati, Salam Vatandost, Niloufar Darvishi, Khalil Moradi

Published in: BMC Cardiovascular Disorders | Issue 1/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a leading cause of global mortality and a prevalent health issue in Iran. Assessing the empowerment of CAD patients during treatment and care is essential. However, no scale is available to measure empowerment in CAD patients in Iran. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Persian version of the "Coronary Artery Disease Empowerment Scale" (CADES).

Method

This methodological and cross-sectional study was conducted on patients with CAD from June 2022 to April 2023 in Kermanshah City, Iran. The scale was translated using the forward–backward translation method. Construct validity was examined using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) with 190 samples and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) with 344 samples, both selected through convenience sampling. Internal consistency was assessed using Cronbach's alpha coefficient, and reliability was evaluated using the test–retest method. SPSS version 27 and LISREL version 8 software were utilized for data analysis.

Results

The EFA and CFA results confirmed the instrument with three factors and 25 items. The model's main indicators in factor analysis were all above 0.9, indicating a good fit for the model. The Pearson correlation coefficient between the items and subscales with the main scale showed a direct and significant relationship. Additionally, Cronbach's alpha coefficient (0.813) and test–retest reliability (0.763) confirmed the reliability of the Persian version of the CADES.

Discussion

The study's results suggest that the Persian version of CADES is both practical and acceptable for evaluating the empowerment of CAD patients. This tool can be relied upon as a valid and reliable method for assessing these patients' empowerment.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
Luo C, Tong Y. Comprehensive study and review of coronary artery disease. in Second International Conference on Biological Engineering and Medical Science (ICBioMed 2022). Bellingham, Washington: SPIE; 2023.
2.
Wahid N, et al. Identification of Coronary Artery Disease using Extra Tree Classification. in 2023 International Conference on Inventive Computation Technologies (ICICT). Piscataway, New Jersey: IEEE; 2023.
3.
Kaur S, Rai S. Coronary Artery Disease: An Overview. A and V Pub Journal of Nursing and Medical Research. 2023;2(1):22–4.CrossRef
4.
Townsend N, et al. Epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in Europe. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2022;19(2):133–43.PubMedCrossRef
5.
Saki N, et al. Prevalence of cardiovascular diseases and associated factors among adults from southwest Iran: Baseline data from Hoveyzeh Cohort Study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2022;22(1):1–10.CrossRef
6.
Bahall M, Legall G, Khan K. Quality of life among patients with cardiac disease: the impact of comorbid depression. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020;18:1–10.CrossRef
7.
Wang R, et al. Patient empowerment and self-management behaviour of chronic disease patients: A moderated mediation model of self-efficacy and health locus of control. J Adv Nurs. 2022;78(4):1055–65.PubMedCrossRef
8.
Alves MP, et al. Measuring Empowerment in patients with chronic disease: psychometric qualities of the portuguese rheumatic disease empowerment scale. Portuguese Journal of Public Health. 2019;36(2):66–71.CrossRef
9.
Park K, et al. Reliability and validity of Korean version of Diabetes Empowerment Scale short form. Journal of Korean Academy of fundamentals of nursing. 2017;24(4):296–303.CrossRef
10.
Lewin D, Piper S. Patient empowerment within a coronary care unit: Insights for health professionals drawn from a patient satisfaction survey. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2007;23(2):81–90.PubMedCrossRef
11.
Krosnick JA. Questionnaire design. In The Palgrave Handbook of Survey Research. 2018. p. 439–455. ISBN 978-3-319-54395-6.
12.
Patten M. Questionnaire research: A practical guide. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge; 2016.
13.
Kärner Köhler A, et al. Patient empowerment and general self-efficacy in patients with coronary heart disease: a cross-sectional study. BMC Fam Pract. 2018;19(1):76.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
14.
Kim J, Shin N, Lee K. Development and evaluation of the Coronary Artery Disease Empowerment Scale (CADES) in Korea. Clin Nurs Res. 2021;30(8):1241–50.PubMedCrossRef
15.
Kyriazos TA. Applied psychometrics: sample size and sample power considerations in factor analysis (EFA, CFA) and SEM in general. Psychology. 2018;9(08):2207.CrossRef
16.
White M. Sample size in quantitative instrument validation studies: A systematic review of articles published in Scopus, 2021. Heliyon. 2022;8(12):e12223.
17.
Wild D, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value in health. 2005;8(2):94–104.PubMedCrossRef
18.
Taghizadeh Z, et al. Psychometric properties of health related measures. Part 1: Translation, development, and content and face validity. Payesh (Health Monitor). 2017;16(3):343–57.
19.
Mohammadbeigi A, Aligol M. Validity and reliability of the instruments and types of measurments in health applied researches. Journal of rafsanjan university of medical sciences. 2015;13(12):1153–70.
20.
Sharif Nia H, et al. Psychometric properties of the death anxiety scale-extended among patients with end-stage renal disease. OMEGA-Journal of Death and Dying. 2020;80(3):380–96.CrossRef
21.
Lawshe CH. A quantitative approach to content validity. Pers Psychol. 1975;28(4):563–75.CrossRef
22.
Govindasamy P, Cumming TM, Abdullah N. Validity and reliability of a needs analysis questionnaire for the development of a creativity module. J Res Spec Educ Needs. 2024;24(3):637–52.CrossRef
23.
Shi J, Mo X, Sun Z. Content validity index in scale development. Zhong nan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Central South University. Medical sciences. 2012;37:152–5.
24.
Bryant, F.B. and P.R. Yarnold, Principal-components analysis and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. 1995.
25.
Marsh HW, Balla JR, McDonald RP. Goodness-of-fit indexes in confirmatory factor analysis: The effect of sample size. Psychol Bull. 1988;103(3):391.CrossRef
26.
Steenkamp J-BE, Maydeu-Olivares A. Unrestricted factor analysis: A powerful alternative to confirmatory factor analysis. J Acad Mark Sci. 2023;51(1):86–113.CrossRef
27.
Boateng GO, et al. Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: a primer. Front Public Health. 2018;6:149.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
28.
Carpenter S, Ten,. steps in scale development and reporting: A guide for researchers. Commun Methods Meas. 2018;12(1):25–44.CrossRef
29.
Murtagh, F. and A. Heck, Multivariate data analysis. Vol. 131. 2012: Springer Science & Business Media.
30.
Henson RK, Roberts JK. Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research: Common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educ Psychol Measur. 2006;66(3):393–416.CrossRef
31.
Byrne BM. Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. Abingdon, Oxfordshire: Routledge; 2013.
32.
Floyd FJ, Widaman KF. Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychol Assess. 1995;7(3):286.CrossRef
33.
Bruton A, Conway JH, Holgate ST. Reliability: what is it, and how is it measured? Physiotherapy. 2000;86(2):94–9.CrossRef
34.
35.
Frost MH, et al. What is sufficient evidence for the reliability and validity of patient-reported outcome measures? Value in Health. 2007;10:S94–105.PubMedCrossRef
36.
Marques LBF, et al. Construct and criterion validity of the functional gait assessment—Brazil in community-dwelling older adults. Braz J Phys Ther. 2021;25(2):186–93.PubMedCrossRef
37.
Polit DF, Beck CT, Owen SV. Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2007;30(4):459–67.PubMedCrossRef
38.
Tavşancıl E. Measuring attitudes and data analysis with SPSS. Tutumların ölçülmesi ve spss ile veri analizi. Ankara: Nobel Yayınları; 2014.
39.
Gravesande J, et al. Test-retest reliability, internal consistency, construct validity and factor structure of a falls risk perception questionnaire in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a prospective cohort study. Archives of physiotherapy. 2019;9:1–11.CrossRef
40.
Kaiser HF. An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika. 1974;39(1):31–6.CrossRef
41.
Alavi M, Biros E, Cleary M. Notes to Factor Analysis Techniques for Construct Validity. Canadian Journal of Nursing Research. 2024;56(2):164–70.CrossRef
42.
Park C, Park Y-H. Validity and reliability of Korean version of health empowerment scale (K-HES) for older adults. Asian Nurs Res. 2013;7(3):142–8.CrossRef
43.
Jiang Z, et al. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the coronary artery disease empowerment scale (CADES) in patients with coronary artery disease after percutaneous coronary intervention. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2024;24(1):438.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
44.
Koo TK, Li MY. A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–63.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
45.
Jafari Sejzi F, Morovati Z, Heidari R. Validation of the cardiovascular management self-efficacy scale. J Med Sci. 2018;61(4):1112–21.
46.
Sejzi FJ, Morovati Z, Heidari R. Validation of the cardiovascular management self-efficacy scale. Journal of the Faculty of Medicine, Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. 2018;61(4):1112–21.
47.
48.
Abdullatif Ibrahim I. Influences of Structural Empowerment and Demographic Factors on Nurses’ Psychological Empowerment. J Nurs Manag. 2023;2023(1):8827968.
49.
Saleh MO, Eshah NF, Rayan AH. Empowerment predicting nurses’ work motivation and occupational mental health. SAGE Open Nursing. 2022;8:23779608221076812.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRef
50.
Brookings JB, Bolton B. Confirmatory factor analysis of a measure of intrapersonal empowerment. Rehabil Psychol. 2000;45(3):292.CrossRef
51.
Peterson NA, et al. Measuring the intrapersonal component of psychological empowerment: Confirmatory factor analysis of the sociopolitical control scale. Am J Community Psychol. 2006;38:287–97.PubMedCrossRef
52.
53.
Qiu R, et al. Chinese hospitalized cardiovascular patients’ attitudes towards self-management: a qualitative study. Patient Preference and Adherence. 2020;14:287–300.
54.
Halim NAA, et al. Patients’ perception towards chronic disease self-management and its program: a cross-sectional survey. Chronic Illness. 2023;19:17423953231185385.
55.
Mosleh SM, Almalik MM. Illness perception and adherence to healthy behaviour in Jordanian coronary heart disease patients. Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2016;15(4):223–30.PubMedCrossRef
56.
Khanian ZS, et al. Designing and validating the empowerment scale for the older individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (ESOCOPD). Heliyon. 2020:6(5):e03909.
57.
Aghili R, et al. Development and validation of diabetes empowerment questionnaire in I ranian people with type 2 diabetes. Int Nurs Rev. 2013;60(2):267–73.PubMedCrossRef
Metadata
Title
Coronary Artery Disease Empowerment Scale (CADES): Persian translation and psychometric properties
Authors
Amir Jalali
Amirhossein Naghibzadeh
Mojgan Rostami
Yasin Ahmadi
Mahbod Khodamorovati
Salam Vatandost
Niloufar Darvishi
Khalil Moradi
Publication date
01-12-2024
Publisher
BioMed Central
Published in
BMC Cardiovascular Disorders / Issue 1/2024
Electronic ISSN: 1471-2261
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12872-024-04369-x

Other articles of this Issue 1/2024

Coronary thrombosis and myocardial ischemia in Kawasaki disease: a case report

Drug therapy problems among hospitalized patients with cardiovascular disease

Effect of residual myocardial ischemia on recovery of left ventricular function after primary percutaneous coronary intervention

Intravascular imaging-guided versus angiography-guided percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic review and bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Myocardial strain is regulated by cardiac preload in the early stage of sepsis

Assessing the predictive value of elevated postoperative syndecan-1 levels for progressive acute kidney injury and kidney replacement therapy necessity in adult cardiac surgery patients

Keynote series | Spotlight on menopause

Menopause can have a significant impact on the body, with effects ranging beyond the endocrine and reproductive systems. Learn about the broader systemic effects of menopause, so you can help patients in your clinics through the transition.

Launching: Thursday 12th December 2024
 

Prof. Martha Hickey
Dr. Claudia Barth
Dr. Samar El Khoudary
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Register your interest now

A quick guide to ECGs

Improve your ECG interpretation skills with this comprehensive, rapid, interactive course. Expert advice provides detailed feedback as you work through 50 ECGs covering the most common cardiac presentations to ensure your practice stays up to date. 

PD Dr. Carsten W. Israel
Developed by: Springer Medizin
Start the cases

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on medication adherence

  • Webinar | 27-06-2024 | 18:00 (CEST)

Medication non-adherence is a major barrier to effective healthcare delivery; half of all patients do not follow their doctor’s recommendations or treatment plan.

Our experts explain the fundamentals with a practical discussion of how to manage non-adherence in two common scenarios: hypertension and asthma control.

Prof. Kevin Dolgin
Prof. Florian Limbourg
Prof. Anoop Chauhan
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Watch now
Image Credits