Skip to main content
Key Specialties
Anesthesiology Cardiology Dermatology Diabetology Endocrinology Gastroenterology General Medicine Geriatrics Hematology Infectious Diseases Internal Medicine Nephrology Neurology Obstetrics and Gynecology Oncology Pediatrics Psychiatry Radiology Respiratory Medicine Rheumatology Surgery Urology
Congress Coverage
2024 ESMO Congress 2024 ERS Congress 2024 EASD Congress 2024 ESC Congress 2024 EAN Congress 2024 ASCO Annual Meeting 2024 ACC Congress
Clinical Collections
Advances in Alzheimer’s

Keynote series | Spotlight on menopause

Menopause can have a significant impact on the body, with effects ranging beyond the endocrine and reproductive systems. Learn about the systemic effects of menopause, so you can help patients in your clinics through the transition.

Launching: Thursday 12th December 2024
ADVANCED SEARCH
Log in
Top
Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports
Published in:

Open Access 16-11-2024 | Apraxia | Review

Apraxia: From Neuroanatomical Pathways to Clinical Manifestations

Authors: Sarah Stoll, Lukas Lorentz, Ferdinand Binkofski, Jennifer Randerath

Published in: Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports | Issue 1/2025

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose of Review

Apraxia typically involves impairments in gesture production and tool use, affecting daily life activities. This article reviews current conceptualizations and developments in diagnostic and therapy.

Recent Findings

Apraxia has been studied in various neurological conditions, particularly stroke and dementia, but recent studies show gesturing deficits in psychiatric populations as well. Promising results have emerged from integrative treatment approaches involving intensive practice of gestures or daily activities. However, several reviews have noted the only marginal progress in apraxia therapy research despite new technologies, like virtual reality and brain stimulation, offering fresh opportunities for assessment and therapy.

Summary

Advances in lesion-symptom mapping and connectivity analyses led to more detailed neuroanatomical models emphasizing parallel and gradual processing. These models facilitate the understanding of underlying mechanisms of motor cognitive performance and its decline. Finally, the digital era prompts the need to study digital tool use in apraxia, with initial efforts underway.
Literature
1.
2.
Rizzolatti G, Matelli M. Two different streams form the dorsal visual system: anatomy and functions. Exp Brain Res. 2003;153:146–57.CrossRefPubMed
3.
Altmann CF, Grodd W, Kourtzi Z, Bülthoff HH, Karnath H-O. Similar cortical correlates underlie visual object identification and orientation judgment. Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(14):2101–8.CrossRefPubMed
4.
Goodale MA, Milner AD. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends Neurosci. 1992;15(1):20–5.CrossRefPubMed
5.
Randerath J, Goldenberg G, Spijkers W, Li Y, Hermsdörfer J. Different left brain regions are essential for grasping a tool compared with its subsequent use. NeuroImage. 2010;53(1):171–80.CrossRefPubMed
6.
Cisek P, Kalaska JF. Neural mechanisms for interacting with a world full of action choices. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2010;33:269–98.CrossRefPubMed
7.
Frey SH. What puts the how in where? Tool use and the divided visual streams hypothesis. Cortex. 2007;43(3):368–75.CrossRefPubMed
8.
9.
Randerath J. A simple illustration of a left lateralized Praxis Network. Including a Brief Commentary; 2020.
10.
Rothi LJG, Heilman KM. Apraxia. The neuropsychology of action. Hove (UK): Psychology; 1997.
11.
Dutschke LL, Stegmayer K, Ramseyer F, Bohlhalter S, Vanbellingen T, Strik W, et al. Gesture impairments in schizophrenia are linked to increased movement and prolonged motor planning and execution. Schizophr Res. 2018;200:42–9.CrossRefPubMed
12.
Buchmann I, Dangel M, Finkel L, Jung R, Makhkamova I, Binder A, et al. Limb apraxia profiles in different clinical samples. Clin Neuropsychol. 2020;34(1):217–42.CrossRefPubMed
13.
Vanbellingen T, Hofmänner D, Kübel S, Bohlhalter S. Limb kinetic apraxia is an independent predictor for quality of life in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disorders Clin Pract. 2018;5(2):156–9.CrossRef
14.
Walther S, Mittal VA, Stegmayer K, Bohlhalter S. Gesture deficits and apraxia in schizophrenia. Cortex. 2020.
15.
Liepmann. Drei Aufsätze aus dem apraxiegebiet. Berlin: Karger; 1908.
16.
Johnen A, Brandstetter L, Kärgel C, Wiendl H, Lohmann H, Duning T. Shared neural correlates of limb apraxia in early stages of Alzheimer’s dementia and behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia. Cortex. 2016;84:1–14.CrossRefPubMed
17.
Lesourd M, Le Gall D. Apraxia and Alzheimer’s disease: review and perspectives. Neuropsycological Reviews. 2013.
18.
Liepmann H. Apraxie. In: Brugsch H, editor. Ergebnisse Der Gesamten Medizin. Wien Berlin: Urban & Schwarzenberg; 1920. pp. 516–43.
19.
Randerath J. Syndromes of Limb Apraxia: Developmental and Acquired disorders of Skilled movements. In: Brown GGK, Haaland T, Crosson KY, B, editors. APA Handbook of Neuropsychology. Volume 1. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION; 2023.
20.
Goldenberg G. Apraxia - the cognitive side of motor control. Oxford, New York: Oxford University Press; 2013.CrossRef
21.
Randerath J. Supplementary material chap. 8: table with exemplary apraxia tests and tests for assessing DCD. In: Brown GGK, Haaland T, Crosson KY, B, editors. APA Handbook of Neuropsychology. Volume 1. AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL ASSOCIATION; 2023.
22.
Heldner MR, Vanbellingen T, Bohlhalter S, Mattle HP, Müri RM, Kamm CP. Coin rotation task: a valid test for manual dexterity in multiple sclerosis. Phys Ther. 2014;94(11):1644–51.CrossRefPubMed
23.
Hermsdörfer J, Li Y, Randerath J, Roby-Brami A, Goldenberg G. Tool use kinematics across different modes of execution. Implications Action Representation Apraxia Cortex. 2013;49(1):184–99.PubMed
24.
Hermsdorfer J, Mai N, Spatt J, Marquardt C, Veltkamp R, Goldenberg G. Kinematic analysis of movement imitation in apraxia. Brain. 1996;119(Pt 5):1575–86.CrossRefPubMed
25.
Randerath J, Goldenberg G, Spijkers W, Li Y, Hermsdörfer J. From pantomime to actual use: how affordances can facilitate actual tool-use. Neuropsychologia. 2011;49(9):2410–6.CrossRefPubMed
26.
Hermsdörfer J, Li Y, Randerath J, Goldenberg G, Johannsen L. Tool use without a tool: kinematic characteristics of pantomiming as compared to actual use and the effect of brain damage. Exp Brain Res. 2012;218:201–14.CrossRefPubMed
27.
Stoll S, Finkel L, Buchmann I, Hassa T, Spiteri S, Liepert J, et al. 100 years after liepmann– lesion correlates of diminished selection and application of familiar versus novel tools. Cortex. 2022;146:1–23.CrossRefPubMed
28.
Buchmann I, Randerath J. Selection and application of familiar and novel tools in patients with left and right hemispheric stroke: Psychometrics and normative data. Cortex. 2017;94:49–62.CrossRefPubMed
29.
30.
Schwartz MF, Segal M, Veramonti T, Ferraro M, Buxbaum LJ. The naturalistic action test: a standardised assessment for everyday action impairment. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 2002;12(4):311–39.CrossRef
31.
Randerath J, Buchmann I, Liepert J, Büsching I. Diagnostic Instrument for Limb Apraxia: Short Version (DILA-S). 2017.
32.
Kalénine S, Buxbaum LJ, Coslett HB. Critical brain regions for action recognition: lesion symptom mapping in left hemisphere stroke. Brain. 2010;133(11):3269–80.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
33.
34.
Kusch M, Gillessen S, Saliger J, Karbe H, Binder E, Fink GR, et al. Reduced awareness for apraxic deficits in left hemisphere stroke. Neuropsychology. 2018;32(4):509.CrossRefPubMed
35.
Smania N, Aglioti SM, Girardi F, Tinazzi M, Fiaschi A, Cosentino A, et al. Rehabilitation of limb apraxia improves daily life activities in patients with stroke. Neurology. 2006;67(11):2050–2.CrossRefPubMed
36.
Stoll H, de Wit MM, Middleton EL, Buxbaum LJ. Treating limb apraxia via action semantics: a preliminary study. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. 2020:1–18.
37.
Geusgens C, Van Heugten C, Cooijmans J, Jolles J, van den Heuvel W. Transfer effects of a cognitive strategy training for stroke patients with apraxia. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2007;29(8):831–41.CrossRefPubMed
38.
Buchmann I, Finkel L, Dangel M, Erz D, Maren Harscher K, Kaupp-Merkle M, et al. A combined therapy for limb apraxia and related anosognosia. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2020;30(10):2016–34.CrossRefPubMed
39.
Randerath J, Buchmann I, Löser A. Naturalistic Action Therapy: Manual. 2019.
40.
Liepmann H. Apraktische Störungen. In: Curschmann H, Kramer F, editors. Lehrbuch Der Nervenkrankheiten. Berlin: Springer; 1925. pp. 408–16.
41.
Rothi LJ, Ochipa C, Heilman KM. A cognitive neuropsychological model of limb praxis. Cognit Neuropsychol. 1991;8(6):443–58.CrossRef
42.
Rothi LJG, Ochipa C, Heilman KM. A cognitive neuropsychological model of limb praxis. In: Rothi LJG, Heilman KM, editors. Apraxia the neuropsychology of action. Hove (UK): Psychology; 1997. pp. 29–49.
43.
44.
Tessari A, Mengotti P, Faccioli L, Tuozzi G, Boscarato S, Taricco M, et al. Effect of body-part specificity and meaning in gesture imitation in left hemisphere stroke patients. Neuropsychologia. 2021;151:107720.CrossRefPubMed
45.
Randerath J, Li Y, Goldenberg G, Hermsdörfer J. Grasping tools: effects of task and apraxia. Neuropsychologia. 2009;47(2):497–505.CrossRefPubMed
46.
Bartolo A, Cubelli R, Della Sala S, Drei S. Pantomimes are special gestures which rely on working memory. Brain Cogn. 2003;53(3):483–94.CrossRefPubMed
47.
Salazar-López E, Schwaiger B, Hermsdörfer J. Lesion correlates of impairments in actual tool use following unilateral brain damage. Neuropsychologia. 2016;84:167–80.CrossRefPubMed
48.
Finkel L, Hogrefe K, Frey SH, Goldenberg G, Randerath J. It takes two to pantomime: communication meets motor cognition. NeuroImage: Clinical; 2018.
49.
Bieńkiewicz M, Brandi M-L, Goldenberg G, Hughes CM, Hermsdörfer J. The tool in the brain: apraxia in ADL. Behavioral and neurological correlates of apraxia in daily living. Front Psychol. 2014;5:353.PubMedCentralPubMed
50.
Hartmann K, Goldenberg G, Daumuller M, Hermsdorfer J. It takes the whole brain to make a cup of coffee: the neuropsychology of naturalistic actions involving technical devices. Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(4):625–37.CrossRefPubMed
51.
Garcea FE, Greene C, Grafton ST, Buxbaum LJ. Structural disconnection of the Tool Use Network after Left Hemisphere Stroke predicts Limb Apraxia Severity. Cereb Cortex Commun. 2020;1(1):tgaa035.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
52.
Weiss PH, Ubben SD, Kaesberg S, Kalbe E, Kessler J, Liebig T et al. Where language meets meaningful action: a combined behavior and lesion analysis of aphasia and apraxia. Brain Struct Function. 2014.
53.
Metaireau M, Osiurak F, Seye A, Lesourd M. The neural correlates of limb apraxia: an anatomical likelihood estimation meta-analysis of lesion-symptom mapping studies in brain-damaged patients. Neurosci Biobehavioral Reviews. 2024:105720.
54.
Hommel B, Attention. Percept Psychophysics. 2019;81(7):2139–54.
55.
Pezzulo G, Cisek P. Navigating the affordance landscape: feedback control as a process model of behavior and cognition. Trends Cogn Sci. 2016;20(6):414–24.CrossRefPubMed
56.
57.
Hommel B, Musseler J, Aschersleben G, Prinz W. The theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behav Brain Sci. 2001;24(5):849–78. discussion 78–937.CrossRefPubMed
58.
Pezzulo G, Parr T, Friston K. Active inference as a theory of sentient behavior. Biol Psychol. 2024:108741.
59.
Weiller C, Reisert M, Glauche V, Musso M, Rijntjes M. The dual-loop model for combining external and internal worlds in our brain. NeuroImage. 2022;263:119583.CrossRefPubMed
60.
Liepmann H. Die linke Hemisphare und das Handeln. Münchener Medizinische Wochenschrift. 1905:48– 9.
61.
Gulde P, Hughes CML, Hermsdörfer J. Effects of stroke on ipsilesional end-effector kinematics in a multi-step activity of daily living. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017;11:42.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
62.
Ungerleider LG, Mishkin M, Goodale MA, Mansfield RJW. 1982.
63.
Martin M, Beume L, Kümmerer D, Schmidt CS, Bormann T, Dressing A, et al. Differential roles of ventral and dorsal streams for conceptual and production-related components of tool use in acute stroke patients. Cereb Cortex. 2016;26(9):3754–71.CrossRefPubMed
64.
Pisella L, Gr‚a H, Tilikete C, Vighetto A, Desmurget M, Rode G, et al. An ‘automatic pilot’ for the hand in human posterior parietal cortex: toward reinterpreting optic ataxia. Nat Neurosci. 2000;3:729–36.CrossRefPubMed
65.
Karnath H-O, Perenin M-T. Cortical control of visually guided reaching: evidence from patients with optic ataxia. Cereb Cortex. 2005;15(10):1561–9.CrossRefPubMed
66.
Auerbach SH, Alexander MP. Pure agraphia and unilateral optic ataxia associated with a left superior parietal lobule lesion. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1981;44:430–2.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
67.
Jeannerod M, Arbib MA, Rizzolatti G, Sakata H. Grasping objects. The cortical mechanisms of visuomotor transformation. Trends Neurosci. 1995;18:205–320.CrossRef
68.
Jüchtern M, Shaikh UJ, Caspers S, Binkofski F. A gradient of hemisphere-specific dorsal to ventral processing routes in parieto-premotor networks. Netw Neurosci. 2024:1–63.
69.
Binkofski F, Buccino G, Stephan KM, Rizzolatti G, Seitz RJ, Freund HJ. A parieto-premotor network for object manipulation: evidence from neuroimaging. Exp Brain Res. 1999;128(1–2):210–3.CrossRefPubMed
70.
71.
Wurm MF, Caramazza A. Two ‘what’pathways for action and object recognition. Trends Cogn Sci. 2022;26(2):103–16.CrossRefPubMed
72.
Buxbaum LJ, Veramonti T, Schwartz MF. Function and Manipulation Tool Knowledge in Apraxia: knowing what for but not how. Neurocase. 2000;6:83–97.
73.
Hodges JR, Bozeat S, Lambon Ralph MA, Patterson K, Spatt J. The role of conceptual knowledge in object use evidence from semantic dementia. Brain. 2000;123(Pt 9):1913–25.CrossRefPubMed
74.
Jo S, Oh JS, Cheong E-N, Kim HJ, Lee S, Oh M, et al. FDG-PET patterns associated with ideomotor apraxia and imitation apraxia in patients with corticobasal syndrome. Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2021;88:96–101.CrossRefPubMed
75.
Lewis-Smith DJ, Wolpe N, Ghosh BCP, Rowe JB. Alien limb in the corticobasal syndrome: phenomenological characteristics and relationship to apraxia. J Neurol. 2020;267(4):1147–57.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
76.
Picillo M, Tepedino MF, Abate F, Ponticorvo S, Erro R, Cuoco S, et al. Uncovering clinical and radiological asymmetry in progressive supranuclear palsy-Richardson’s syndrome. Neurol Sci. 2022;43(6):3677–82.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
77.
Renftle D, Becker S, Brockmann K, Gasser T, Michaelis K, Solbrig S, et al. Evaluation of the Dementia Apraxia Test in Parkinson’s disease patients. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2022;51(3):271–8.CrossRefPubMed
78.
Yliranta A, Nuorva J, Karjalainen VL, Ahmasalo R, Jehkonen M. The dementia apraxia test can detect early-onset Alzheimer’s disease. Neuropsychology. 2023;37(1):44–51.CrossRefPubMed
79.
Maggio MG, Stagnitti MC, Rizzo E, Andaloro A, Manuli A, Bruschetta A, et al. Limb apraxia in individuals with multiple sclerosis: is there a role of semi-immersive virtual reality in treating the Cinderella of neuropsychology? Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2023;69:104405.CrossRefPubMed
80.
Pavlidou A, Viher PV, Bachofner H, Weiss F, Stegmayer K, Shankman SA, et al. Hand gesture performance is impaired in major depressive disorder: A matter of working memory performance? J Affect Disord. 2021;292:81–8.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
81.
Özönder Ünal I, Berkol TD. Investigation of Apraxia in patients with Schizophrenia and bipolar disorder type I. Psychiatr Danub. 2023;35(1):47–55.CrossRefPubMed
82.
Walther S, Alexaki D, Stegmayer K, Vanbellingen T, Bohlhalter S. Conceptual disorganization impairs hand gesture performance in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2020;215:467–8.CrossRefPubMed
83.
Wüthrich F, Pavlidou A, Stegmayer K, Eisenhardt S, Moor J, Schäppi L, et al. Nonverbal communication remains untouched: no beneficial effect of symptomatic improvement on poor gesture performance in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2020;223:258–64.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
84.
Viher PV, Abdulkadir A, Savadijev P, Stegmayer K, Kubicki M, Makris N, et al. Structural organization of the praxis network predicts gesture production: evidence from healthy subjects and patients with schizophrenia. Cortex. 2020;132:322–33.CrossRefPubMed
85.
Quamar AH, Schmeler MR, Collins DM, Schein RM. Information communication technology-enabled instrumental activities of daily living: a paradigm shift in functional assessment. Disabil Rehabilitation: Assist Technol. 2020;15(7):746–53.
86.
Randerath J, Stoll S, Hopfer K, Bauer I. Digital Tools Test (DIGI): A Brief Manual. 2023.
87.
Stoll SE, Bauer I, Hopfer K, Lamberty J, Lunz V, Guzmán Bausch F, et al. Diagnosing homo digitalis: towards a standardized assessment for digital tool competencies. Front Psychol. 2024;14:1270437.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
88.
Rohrbach N, Krewer C, Löhnert L, Thierfelder A, Randerath J, Jahn K, et al. Improvement of Apraxia with augmented reality: influencing pantomime of Tool Use via Holographic cues. Front Neurol. 2021;12:711900.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
89.
Park W, Kim J, Kim M. Efficacy of virtual reality therapy in ideomotor apraxia rehabilitation: a case report. Med (Baltim). 2021;100(28):e26657.CrossRef
90.
Gölz MS, Finkel L, Kehlbeck R, Herschbach A, Bauer I, Scheib JP, et al. From virtual to physical environments when judging action opportunities: are diagnostics and trainings transferable? Virtual Reality. 2023;27(3):1697–715.CrossRef
91.
Barhorst-Cates EM, Isaacs MW, Buxbaum LJ, Wong AL. Does spatial perspective in virtual reality affect imitation accuracy in stroke patients? Front Virtual Real. 2022;3.
92.
Pastore-Wapp M, Nyffeler T, Nef T, Bohlhalter S, Vanbellingen T. Non-invasive brain stimulation in limb praxis and apraxia: a scoping review in healthy subjects and patients with stroke. Cortex. 2021;138:152–64.CrossRefPubMed
93.
Walther S, Kunz M, Müller M, Zürcher C, Vladimirova I, Bachofner H, et al. Single Session Transcranial magnetic stimulation ameliorates Hand Gesture deficits in Schizophrenia. Schizophr Bull. 2020;46(2):286–93.PubMed
94.
Park JE, Hallett M, Jang HR, Kim LU, Park KJ, Kim SK, et al. Effects of anodal stimulation and motor practice on limb-kinetic apraxia in Parkinson’s disease. Exp Brain Res. 2022;240(4):1249–56.PubMedCentralCrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Apraxia: From Neuroanatomical Pathways to Clinical Manifestations
Authors
Sarah Stoll
Lukas Lorentz
Ferdinand Binkofski
Jennifer Randerath
Publication date
16-11-2024

Other articles of this Issue 1/2025

The Development of Epilepsy Following CNS Viral Infections: Mechanisms

  • Review

Advances in Primary Central Nervous System Lymphoma

  • Review

The Spectrum of Movement Disorders Associated with Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

  • Review

Emerging Therapies for Brain Metastases in NSCLC, Breast Cancer, and Melanoma: A Critical Review

  • Review

Improving Indigenous Stroke Outcomes by Shifting Our Focus from Health to Cultural Literacy

  • Review

Keynote series | Spotlight on menopause

Menopause can have a significant impact on the body, with effects ranging beyond the endocrine and reproductive systems. Learn about the broader systemic effects of menopause, so you can help patients in your clinics through the transition.

Launching: Thursday 12th December 2024
 

Prof. Martha Hickey
Dr. Claudia Barth
Dr. Samar El Khoudary
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Register your interest now

Advances in Alzheimer's

Alzheimer's research and care is changing rapidly. Keep up with the latest developments from key international conferences, together with expert insights on how to integrate these advances into practice.

This content is intended for healthcare professionals outside of the UK.

Supported by:
  • Lilly
Developed by: Springer Healthcare IME
Learn more
Image Credits