Skip to main content
Top

Open Access 27-09-2024 | Antibiotic | Original Article

Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury Care Bundle: A Quality Improvement Initiative

Authors: T. Clark Powell, Tanya P. Hoke, Kyle P. Norris, Margaret R. Page, Allison Todd, David T. Redden, Cynthia G. Brumfield, J. Michael Straughn Jr., Holly E. Richter

Published in: International Urogynecology Journal

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction and Hypothesis

The objective was to implement an evidence-based peri-partum care bundle for women sustaining obstetric anal sphincter injuries and to evaluate compliance with recommendations for antibiotics use, repair in the operating room, and follow-up before and after implementation.

Methods

This project was reviewed by the Institutional Review Board and determined to be exempt. A clinical care bundle containing education and standardized orders in the electronic medical record was implemented. Characteristics of pre- (October 2017 to September 2019) and post-intervention (October 2019 to August 2021) cohorts were compared and compliance with recommendations for antibiotics use, surgical repair location, and follow-up were evaluated. Chi-squared, Fisher’s exact, ANOVA F, and Kruskal–Wallis tests were performed, as indicated. Significance level was p < 0.05.

Results

A total of 185 cases were identified. Seventy-five percent of women were nulliparous. Mean gestational age was 39 weeks. Pre- and post-intervention groups did not differ in age, BMI, race, parity, gestational age, comorbidities, birthweight, or delivery type. Ninety-eight cases were identified pre-implementation. Eighty-six (88%) had third-degree lacerations. Post-implementation, 87 cases were identified. Seventy (80%) had third-degree lacerations (p = 0.17). Recommended antibiotic-type use improved from 35% pre-implementation to 93% post-implementation (p < 0.001). Repair in the operating room was similar pre-implementation and post-implementation (16.0% vs 12.6%, p = 0.48). Post-partum follow-up within 2 weeks improved from 16.3% pre-implementation to 52.8% post-implementation and mean time to follow-up was shorter post-implementation than pre-implementation (18 vs 33 days; both p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Implementation of an evidence-based peri-partum care bundle resulted in standardization of care in accordance with established recommendations. Compliance with recommendations for surgical repair in the operating room remained unchanged.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Jha S, Parker V. Risk factors for recurrent obstetric anal sphincter injury (rOASI): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(6):849–57.CrossRefPubMed Jha S, Parker V. Risk factors for recurrent obstetric anal sphincter injury (rOASI): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urogynecol J. 2016;27(6):849–57.CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Evers EC, et al. Obstetrical anal sphincter laceration and anal incontinence 5–10 years after childbirth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(5):425.e1–6.CrossRefPubMed Evers EC, et al. Obstetrical anal sphincter laceration and anal incontinence 5–10 years after childbirth. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;207(5):425.e1–6.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Fenner DE, et al. Fecal and urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery with anal sphincter disruption in an obstetrics unit in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(6):1543–9; discussion 1549–50.CrossRefPubMed Fenner DE, et al. Fecal and urinary incontinence after vaginal delivery with anal sphincter disruption in an obstetrics unit in the United States. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;189(6):1543–9; discussion 1549–50.CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Evans C, et al. Management of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) in subsequent pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;34(6):486–8.CrossRefPubMed Evans C, et al. Management of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) in subsequent pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2014;34(6):486–8.CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Friedman AM, et al. Evaluation of third-degree and fourth-degree laceration rates as quality indicators. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(4):927–37.CrossRefPubMed Friedman AM, et al. Evaluation of third-degree and fourth-degree laceration rates as quality indicators. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(4):927–37.CrossRefPubMed
6.
go back to reference Pergialiotis V, et al. Risk factors for severe perineal lacerations during childbirth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;125(1):6–14.CrossRefPubMed Pergialiotis V, et al. Risk factors for severe perineal lacerations during childbirth. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2014;125(1):6–14.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Lewicky-Gaupp C, et al. Wound complications after obstetric anal sphincter injuries. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(5):1088–93.CrossRefPubMed Lewicky-Gaupp C, et al. Wound complications after obstetric anal sphincter injuries. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(5):1088–93.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Duggal N, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of postpartum perineal wound complications: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(6):1268–73.CrossRefPubMed Duggal N, et al. Antibiotic prophylaxis for prevention of postpartum perineal wound complications: a randomized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111(6):1268–73.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Powell BJ, et al. A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implement Sci. 2015;10:21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Powell BJ, et al. A refined compilation of implementation strategies: results from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) project. Implement Sci. 2015;10:21.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
12.
go back to reference Resar R, Griffin FA, Haraden C, Nolan TW. Using care bundles to improve health care quality. In: IHI Innovation Series white paper. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2012. Resar R, Griffin FA, Haraden C, Nolan TW. Using care bundles to improve health care quality. In: IHI Innovation Series white paper. Cambridge, MA: Institute for Healthcare Improvement; 2012.
13.
14.
go back to reference Illston JD, et al. Modified beef tongue model for fourth-degree laceration repair simulation. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(3):491–6.CrossRefPubMed Illston JD, et al. Modified beef tongue model for fourth-degree laceration repair simulation. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129(3):491–6.CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Stock L, et al. Factors associated with wound complications in women with obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208(4):327.e1–6.CrossRefPubMed Stock L, et al. Factors associated with wound complications in women with obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS). Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013;208(4):327.e1–6.CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. Practice bulletin no. 165: prevention and management of obstetric lacerations at vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(1):e1–15.CrossRef American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins—Obstetrics. Practice bulletin no. 165: prevention and management of obstetric lacerations at vaginal delivery. Obstet Gynecol. 2016;128(1):e1–15.CrossRef
19.
go back to reference Cox CK, et al. Antibiotic use during repair of obstetrical anal sphincter injury: a quality improvement initiative. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022;156(1):95–101.CrossRefPubMed Cox CK, et al. Antibiotic use during repair of obstetrical anal sphincter injury: a quality improvement initiative. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2022;156(1):95–101.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Obstetric Anal Sphincter Injury Care Bundle: A Quality Improvement Initiative
Authors
T. Clark Powell
Tanya P. Hoke
Kyle P. Norris
Margaret R. Page
Allison Todd
David T. Redden
Cynthia G. Brumfield
J. Michael Straughn Jr.
Holly E. Richter
Publication date
27-09-2024
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Keyword
Antibiotic
Published in
International Urogynecology Journal
Print ISSN: 0937-3462
Electronic ISSN: 1433-3023
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00192-024-05885-2