Skip to main content
Top

Anisocoria After Direct Light Stimulus is Associated with Poor Outcomes Following Acute Brain Injury

  • 25-06-2024
  • Original work
Published in:

Abstract

Background

Assessing pupil size and reactivity is the standard of care in neurocritically ill patients. Anisocoria observed in critically ill patients often prompts further investigation and treatment. This study explores anisocoria at rest and after light stimulus determined using quantitative pupillometry as a predictor of discharge modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores.

Methods

This analysis includes data from an international registry and includes patients with paired (left and right eye) quantitative pupillometry readings linked to discharge mRS scores. Anisocoria was defined as the absolute difference in pupil size using three common cut points (> 0.5 mm, > 1 mm, and > 2 mm). Nonparametric models were constructed to explore patient outcome using three predictors: the presence of anisocoria at rest (in ambient light); the presence of anisocoria after light stimulus; and persistent anisocoria (present both at rest and after light). The primary outcome was discharge mRS score associated with the presence of anisocoria at rest versus after light stimulus using the three commonly defined cut points.

Results

This analysis included 152,905 paired observations from 6,654 patients with a mean age of 57.0 (standard deviation 17.9) years, and a median hospital stay of 5 (interquartile range 3–12) days. The mean admission Glasgow Coma Scale score was 12.7 (standard deviation 3.5), and the median discharge mRS score was 2 (interquartile range 0–4). The ranges for absolute differences in pupil diameters were 0–5.76 mm at rest and 0–6.84 mm after light. Using an anisocoria cut point of > 0.5 mm, patients with anisocoria after light had worse median mRS scores (2 [interquartile range 0–4]) than patients with anisocoria at rest (1 [interquartile range 0–3]; P < .0001). Patients with persistent anisocoria had worse median mRS scores (3 [interquartile range 1–4]) than those without persistent anisocoria (1 [interquartile range 0–3]; P < .0001). Similar findings were observed using a cut point for anisocoria of > 1 mm and > 2 mm.

Conclusions

Anisocoria after light is a new biomarker that portends worse outcome than anisocoria at rest. After further validation, anisocoria after light should be considered for inclusion as a reported and trended assessment value.
Title
Anisocoria After Direct Light Stimulus is Associated with Poor Outcomes Following Acute Brain Injury
Authors
Brittany R. Doyle
Venkatesh Aiyagari
Shoji Yokobori
Joji B. Kuramatsu
Arianna Barnes
Ava Puccio
Emerson B. Nairon
Jade L. Marshall
DaiWai M. Olson
Publication date
25-06-2024
Publisher
Springer US
Published in
Neurocritical Care / Issue 3/2024
Print ISSN: 1541-6933
Electronic ISSN: 1556-0961
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s12028-024-02030-1
This content is only visible if you are logged in and have the appropriate permissions.

Mini masterclass: enhancing outcomes in LGS (Link opens in a new window)

1.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credit(s)

These six bite-sized videos will equip you with insights into the pathophysiological processes underlying Lennox–Gastaut syndrome, the burden on patients and caregivers, and opportunities to increase diagnostic accuracy and optimize treatment strategies.

Independent Medical Education Grant:
  • Jazz Pharmaceuticals
Watch now TODO (Link opens in a new window)

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on functional neurological disorder

FND perplexes and frustrates patients and physicians alike. Limited knowledge and insufficient awareness delays diagnosis and treatment, and many patients feel misunderstood and stigmatized. How can you recognize FND and what are the treatment options?

Prof. Mark Edwards
Watch now
Video
Image Credits
Enchancing Lennox-Gastaut Syndrome program image/© Springer Health+ IME, Human brain illustration/© (M) CHRISTOPH BURGSTEDT / SCIENCE PHOTO LIBRARY / Getty Images