Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

16-05-2024 | Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis | Original Article

The efficacy of anterior vertebral body tethering in lenke type 6 curves for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Authors: Per D. Trobisch, Hong Jin Kim, Stephanie Da Paz, Dong-Gune Chang

Published in: European Spine Journal | Issue 7/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

Spinal fusion is the standard treatment for severe forms of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS). However, with the lowest instrumented vertebra that is usually located at L3 or L4, patients are prone to develop adjacent segment degeneration in the long term. Vertebral body tethering (VBT) as motion preserving technique has become an alternative for select patients with AIS. Several studies have presented the outcome after thoracic VBT but no study has analyzed the outcome after VBT for Lenke type 6 curves.

Methods

This is a retrospective single center data analysis of patients who have had bilateral VBT for Lenke type 6 curves and a minimum follow up of 24 months. Radiographic analysis was performed on several time points. Suspected tether breakages were additionally analyzed with respect to location and time at occurrence.

Results

25 patients were included. Immediate thoracic curve correction was 55.4% and 71.7% for TL/L curves. Loss of correction was higher for TL/L curves and resulted in a correction rate of 48.3% for thoracic curves and 48.9% for TL/L curves at 24 months post-operatively. 22 patients were suspected to have at least one segment with a tether breakage. Three patients required a re-VBT but no patient received posterior spinal fusion.

Conclusion

Bilateral VBT for Lenke type 6 curves is feasible and shows a significant curve correction for thoracic and TL/L curves at a minimum of 24 months post-operatively. Tether breakage rate and loss of correction remain an unfavorable observation that needs to be improved in the future.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
go back to reference Trobisch PD, Ducoffe AR, Lonner BS, Errico TJ (2013) Choosing fusion levels in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 21:519–528PubMed Trobisch PD, Ducoffe AR, Lonner BS, Errico TJ (2013) Choosing fusion levels in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 21:519–528PubMed
2.
go back to reference Nohara A, Kawakami N, Seki K et al (2015) The effects of spinal fusion on lumbar disc degeneration in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a minimum 10-year follow-up. Spine Deform 3:462–468CrossRefPubMed Nohara A, Kawakami N, Seki K et al (2015) The effects of spinal fusion on lumbar disc degeneration in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a minimum 10-year follow-up. Spine Deform 3:462–468CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Marks MC, Bastrom TP, Petcharaporn M et al (2015) The effect of time and fusion length on motion of the unfused lumbar segments in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform 3:549–553CrossRefPubMed Marks MC, Bastrom TP, Petcharaporn M et al (2015) The effect of time and fusion length on motion of the unfused lumbar segments in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine Deform 3:549–553CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Newton PO, Parent S, Myjani F et al (2022) Anterior vertebral body tethering compared with posterior spinal fusion for major thoracic curves: a retrospective comparison by the harms study group. J Bone Joint Surg Am 104:2170–2177CrossRefPubMed Newton PO, Parent S, Myjani F et al (2022) Anterior vertebral body tethering compared with posterior spinal fusion for major thoracic curves: a retrospective comparison by the harms study group. J Bone Joint Surg Am 104:2170–2177CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Welborn MC, Blakemore L, Handford C et al (2023) Thoracolumbar curve behafior after selective thoracic anterior vertebral body tethering in Lenke 1A vs Lenke 1C curve patterns. Spine Deform 11:897–907CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Welborn MC, Blakemore L, Handford C et al (2023) Thoracolumbar curve behafior after selective thoracic anterior vertebral body tethering in Lenke 1A vs Lenke 1C curve patterns. Spine Deform 11:897–907CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Alanay A, Yucekul A, Abul K et al (2020) Thoracoscopic vertebral body tethering for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: follow-up curve behavior according to Sanders skeletal maturity staging. Spine 45:E1483–E1492CrossRefPubMed Alanay A, Yucekul A, Abul K et al (2020) Thoracoscopic vertebral body tethering for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: follow-up curve behavior according to Sanders skeletal maturity staging. Spine 45:E1483–E1492CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Trobisch PD, Baroncini A (2021) Preliminary outcomes after vertebral body tethering (VBT) for lumbar curves and subanalysis of a 1-versus 2-tether construct. Eur Spine J 30:3570–3576CrossRefPubMed Trobisch PD, Baroncini A (2021) Preliminary outcomes after vertebral body tethering (VBT) for lumbar curves and subanalysis of a 1-versus 2-tether construct. Eur Spine J 30:3570–3576CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Trobisch PD, Castelein R, Da Paz S (2023) Radiographic outcome after vertebral body tethering of the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 32:1895–1900CrossRefPubMed Trobisch PD, Castelein R, Da Paz S (2023) Radiographic outcome after vertebral body tethering of the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J 32:1895–1900CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Nicolini LF, Kobbe P, Seggewiß J et al (2022) Motion preserving surgery for scoliosis with a vertebral body tethering system: a biomechanical study. Eur Spine J 31:1013–1021CrossRefPubMed Nicolini LF, Kobbe P, Seggewiß J et al (2022) Motion preserving surgery for scoliosis with a vertebral body tethering system: a biomechanical study. Eur Spine J 31:1013–1021CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Baroncini A, Rodriguez L, Verma K, Trobisch PD (2021) Feasibility of single-staged bilateral anterior scoliosis correction in growing patients. Global Spine J 11:76–80CrossRefPubMed Baroncini A, Rodriguez L, Verma K, Trobisch PD (2021) Feasibility of single-staged bilateral anterior scoliosis correction in growing patients. Global Spine J 11:76–80CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J et al (2001) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg 83:1169–1181CrossRefPubMed Lenke LG, Betz RR, Harms J et al (2001) Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg 83:1169–1181CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Trobisch P, Baroncini A, Berrer A, Da Paz S (2022) Difference between radiographically suspected and intraoperatively confirmed tether breakages after vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 31:1045–1050CrossRefPubMed Trobisch P, Baroncini A, Berrer A, Da Paz S (2022) Difference between radiographically suspected and intraoperatively confirmed tether breakages after vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 31:1045–1050CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Bartley CE, Yaszay B, Bastrom TP et al (2017) Perioperative and delayed major complications following surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99:1206–1212CrossRefPubMed Bartley CE, Yaszay B, Bastrom TP et al (2017) Perioperative and delayed major complications following surgical treatment of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 99:1206–1212CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Wang Y, Bünger CE, Zhang Y, Hansen ES (2012) Extensive fusion for Lenke 3c and 6c scoliosis: a two year radiographic follow-up. Int Orthop 36:795–801CrossRefPubMed Wang Y, Bünger CE, Zhang Y, Hansen ES (2012) Extensive fusion for Lenke 3c and 6c scoliosis: a two year radiographic follow-up. Int Orthop 36:795–801CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH et al (2007) Proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after 3 different types of posterior segmental spinal instrumentation and fusion: incidence and risk factor analysis of 410 cases. Spine 32:2731–2738CrossRefPubMed Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH et al (2007) Proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after 3 different types of posterior segmental spinal instrumentation and fusion: incidence and risk factor analysis of 410 cases. Spine 32:2731–2738CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Frantzen A, Suominen EN, Saarinen AJ et al (2023) Association between Lenke classification, the extend of lumbar spinal fusion, and health-related quality of life after instrumented spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 48:1216–1223CrossRefPubMed Frantzen A, Suominen EN, Saarinen AJ et al (2023) Association between Lenke classification, the extend of lumbar spinal fusion, and health-related quality of life after instrumented spinal fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 48:1216–1223CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Koller H, Enercan M, Decker S et al (2021) Resolution of the lumbosacral fractional curve and evaluation of the risk for adding on in 101 patients with posterior correction of Lenke 3, 4, and 6 curves. J Neurosurg Spine 35:471–485PubMed Koller H, Enercan M, Decker S et al (2021) Resolution of the lumbosacral fractional curve and evaluation of the risk for adding on in 101 patients with posterior correction of Lenke 3, 4, and 6 curves. J Neurosurg Spine 35:471–485PubMed
19.
go back to reference Trobisch P, Mahoney JM, Eichenlaub EK et al (2023) An investigation of range of motion preservation in fusionless anterior double screw and cord constructs for scoliosis correction. Eur Spine J 32:1173–1186CrossRefPubMed Trobisch P, Mahoney JM, Eichenlaub EK et al (2023) An investigation of range of motion preservation in fusionless anterior double screw and cord constructs for scoliosis correction. Eur Spine J 32:1173–1186CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Boeyer ME, Farid S, Wiesemann S, Hoernschemeyer DG (2023) Outcomes of vertebral body tethering in the lumbar spine. Spine Deform 11:909–918CrossRefPubMed Boeyer ME, Farid S, Wiesemann S, Hoernschemeyer DG (2023) Outcomes of vertebral body tethering in the lumbar spine. Spine Deform 11:909–918CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Baroncini A, Courvoisier A, Berjano P et al (2022) The effects of vertebral body tethering on sagittal parameters: evaluations from a 2-years follow-up. Eur Spine J 31:1060–1066CrossRefPubMed Baroncini A, Courvoisier A, Berjano P et al (2022) The effects of vertebral body tethering on sagittal parameters: evaluations from a 2-years follow-up. Eur Spine J 31:1060–1066CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference Pehlivanoglu T, Oltulu I, Erdag Y (2021) Double-sided vertebral body tethering of double adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves: radiographic outcomes of the first 13 patients with 2 years of follow-up. Eur Spine J 30:1896–1904CrossRefPubMed Pehlivanoglu T, Oltulu I, Erdag Y (2021) Double-sided vertebral body tethering of double adolescent idiopathic scoliosis curves: radiographic outcomes of the first 13 patients with 2 years of follow-up. Eur Spine J 30:1896–1904CrossRefPubMed
23.
go back to reference Cherian D, Samdani AF, Schüpper AJ et al (2023) Early outcomes in hybrid fixation for idiopathic scoliosis: posterior fusion combined with anterior vertebral body tethering Patient series. J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 6:23331CrossRef Cherian D, Samdani AF, Schüpper AJ et al (2023) Early outcomes in hybrid fixation for idiopathic scoliosis: posterior fusion combined with anterior vertebral body tethering Patient series. J Neurosurg Case Lessons. 6:23331CrossRef
Metadata
Title
The efficacy of anterior vertebral body tethering in lenke type 6 curves for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis
Authors
Per D. Trobisch
Hong Jin Kim
Stephanie Da Paz
Dong-Gune Chang
Publication date
16-05-2024
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal / Issue 7/2024
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-024-08300-y

Other articles of this Issue 7/2024

European Spine Journal 7/2024 Go to the issue