Skip to main content
Top

Open Access 12-03-2025 | Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis | Original Article

Fusion maturation over time in operated on adolescent idipathic scoliosis – a low dose CT study up to 5 years

Authors: Fredrik Strömqvist, Irina Vasilescu, Acke Ohlin, Anders Möller, Kasim Abul-Kasim

Published in: European Spine Journal

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to evaluate bony fusion with Low Dose CT (LDCT) over time following posterior scoliosis surgery in an all screw construct in patients with AIS with special focus on whether the spinal fusion process continue to develop beyond 2 years after scoliosis surgery and to evaluate if LDCT is an adequate radiological method to assess fusion maturation.

Methods

Twenty five consecutive patients with mean age 17 (range 13–24) were operated on during 2009–2010 with index diagnosis AIS. Two neuroradiologists used a LDCT protocol to independently evaluate the occurrence and degree of bony fusion at 2 years and 5 years after surgery (ankylosed facet joints). The instrumented spine was divided in an upper, a middle and a lower third on each side in the 25 patients, leaving 150 regions to be assessed. Fusion in each region was classified based on the status of the facet joints as total, partial or non-fusion.

Results

Progression of fusion degree between 2 years and 5 years postoperatively occurred in 18 patients (72%). At 5 years follow-up, 60% showed evidence of total fusion and none showed non-fusion. The interobserver agreement in the classification of bony fusion 2 years postoperatively was almost perfect with a Kappa coefficient of 0.94 and between 2 and 5 years postoperatively a Kappa Coefficient of 0.90.

Conclusions

The fusion maturation progress continues beyond two years following posterior scoliosis surgery in AIS. LDCT is a reliable radiological method to reveal bony fusion maturation over time after posterior scoliosis surgery.
Literature
1.
go back to reference Betz RR et al (2006) Allograft versus no graft with a posterior multisegmented Hook system for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 31(2):121–127CrossRefPubMed Betz RR et al (2006) Allograft versus no graft with a posterior multisegmented Hook system for the treatment of idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 31(2):121–127CrossRefPubMed
2.
go back to reference Price CT et al (2003) Comparison of bone grafts for posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 28(8):793–798CrossRefPubMed Price CT et al (2003) Comparison of bone grafts for posterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 28(8):793–798CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Theologis AA et al (2015) Type of bone graft or substitute does not affect outcome of spine fusion with instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 40(17):1345–1351CrossRefPubMed Theologis AA et al (2015) Type of bone graft or substitute does not affect outcome of spine fusion with instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 40(17):1345–1351CrossRefPubMed
4.
go back to reference Abul-Kasim K et al (2010) Radiological and clinical outcome of screw placement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: evaluation with low-dose computed tomography. Eur Spine J 19(1):96–104CrossRefPubMed Abul-Kasim K et al (2010) Radiological and clinical outcome of screw placement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: evaluation with low-dose computed tomography. Eur Spine J 19(1):96–104CrossRefPubMed
5.
go back to reference Abul-Kasim K, Ohlin A (2011) The rate of screw misplacement in segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Acta Orthop 82(1):50–55CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Abul-Kasim K, Ohlin A (2011) The rate of screw misplacement in segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Acta Orthop 82(1):50–55CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
6.
go back to reference Abul-Kasim K et al (2009) Low-dose helical computed tomography (CT) in the perioperative workup of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Radiol 19(3):610–618CrossRefPubMed Abul-Kasim K et al (2009) Low-dose helical computed tomography (CT) in the perioperative workup of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Radiol 19(3):610–618CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Suk SI et al (1995) Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 20(12):1399–1405CrossRefPubMed Suk SI et al (1995) Segmental pedicle screw fixation in the treatment of thoracic idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 20(12):1399–1405CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Abul-Kasim K, Ohlin A (2014) Evaluation of implant loosening following segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a 2 year follow-up with low-dose CT. Scoliosis 9:13CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Abul-Kasim K, Ohlin A (2014) Evaluation of implant loosening following segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a 2 year follow-up with low-dose CT. Scoliosis 9:13CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
9.
go back to reference Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174CrossRefPubMed Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33(1):159–174CrossRefPubMed
10.
go back to reference Knapp DR Jr., Jones ET Use of cortical cancellous allograft for posterior spinal fusion. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1988(229): p. 99–106 Knapp DR Jr., Jones ET Use of cortical cancellous allograft for posterior spinal fusion. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 1988(229): p. 99–106
11.
go back to reference Kirzner N et al (2018) Bone graft in posterior spine fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg 88(12):1247–1252CrossRefPubMed Kirzner N et al (2018) Bone graft in posterior spine fusion for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg 88(12):1247–1252CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Miyashita T et al (2015) Good clinical outcomes and fusion rate of facet fusion with a percutaneous pedicle screw system for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: minimally invasive evolution of posterolateral fusion. Spine 40(9):E552–E557CrossRefPubMed Miyashita T et al (2015) Good clinical outcomes and fusion rate of facet fusion with a percutaneous pedicle screw system for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: minimally invasive evolution of posterolateral fusion. Spine 40(9):E552–E557CrossRefPubMed
13.
go back to reference Kim DH et al (2020) Potential significance of facet joint fusion or posteromedial fusion observed on CT imaging following attempted posterolateral or posterior interbody fusion. Spine J 20(3):337–343CrossRefPubMed Kim DH et al (2020) Potential significance of facet joint fusion or posteromedial fusion observed on CT imaging following attempted posterolateral or posterior interbody fusion. Spine J 20(3):337–343CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Carreon LY et al (2007) Diagnostic accuracy and reliability of fine-cut CT scans with reconstructions to determine the status of an instrumented posterolateral fusion with surgical exploration as reference standard. Spine 32(8):892–895CrossRefPubMed Carreon LY et al (2007) Diagnostic accuracy and reliability of fine-cut CT scans with reconstructions to determine the status of an instrumented posterolateral fusion with surgical exploration as reference standard. Spine 32(8):892–895CrossRefPubMed
15.
go back to reference Farber GL et al (1995) Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in lumbar fusions by plain radiographs and computed tomography. Spine 20(13):1494–1499CrossRefPubMed Farber GL et al (1995) Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in lumbar fusions by plain radiographs and computed tomography. Spine 20(13):1494–1499CrossRefPubMed
16.
go back to reference Kuklo TR et al (2005) Accuracy and efficacy of thoracic pedicle screws in curves more than 90 degrees. Spine 30(2):222–226CrossRefPubMed Kuklo TR et al (2005) Accuracy and efficacy of thoracic pedicle screws in curves more than 90 degrees. Spine 30(2):222–226CrossRefPubMed
17.
go back to reference Liljenqvist UR, Halm HF, Link TM (1997) Pedicle screw instrumentation of the thoracic spine in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 22(19):2239–2245CrossRefPubMed Liljenqvist UR, Halm HF, Link TM (1997) Pedicle screw instrumentation of the thoracic spine in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 22(19):2239–2245CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Rajasekaran S et al (2007) Randomized clinical study to compare the accuracy of navigated and non-navigated thoracic pedicle screws in deformity correction surgeries. Spine 32(2):E56–64CrossRefPubMed Rajasekaran S et al (2007) Randomized clinical study to compare the accuracy of navigated and non-navigated thoracic pedicle screws in deformity correction surgeries. Spine 32(2):E56–64CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Smorgick Y et al (2005) Accuracy and safety of thoracic pedicle screw placement in spinal deformities. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(6):522–526CrossRefPubMed Smorgick Y et al (2005) Accuracy and safety of thoracic pedicle screw placement in spinal deformities. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(6):522–526CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Lehman RA Jr. et al (2007) Computed tomography evaluation of pedicle screws placed in the pediatric deformed spine over an 8-year period. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(24):2679–2684CrossRefPubMed Lehman RA Jr. et al (2007) Computed tomography evaluation of pedicle screws placed in the pediatric deformed spine over an 8-year period. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32(24):2679–2684CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Hicks JM et al (2010) Complications of pedicle screw fixation in scoliosis surgery: a systematic review. Spine 35(11):E465–E470CrossRefPubMed Hicks JM et al (2010) Complications of pedicle screw fixation in scoliosis surgery: a systematic review. Spine 35(11):E465–E470CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Fusion maturation over time in operated on adolescent idipathic scoliosis – a low dose CT study up to 5 years
Authors
Fredrik Strömqvist
Irina Vasilescu
Acke Ohlin
Anders Möller
Kasim Abul-Kasim
Publication date
12-03-2025
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
European Spine Journal
Print ISSN: 0940-6719
Electronic ISSN: 1432-0932
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-08767-3