Skip to main content
Top

Open Access 10-04-2025 | Adalimumab | Review

Filgotinib Radiographic and Clinical Efficacy Versus Other JAK Inhibitors and Adalimumab in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and Inadequate Response to Methotrexate: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

Authors: Yoshiya Tanaka, Rene Westhovens, Hong Sun, Carole Van der Donckt, Yan Zhong, Toshihiko Kaise

Published in: Rheumatology and Therapy

Login to get access

Abstract

A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted to examine the radiographic and clinical efficacy of the Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib and the biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) adalimumab (all given with methotrexate [MTX]) in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and an inadequate response to MTX (MTX-IR). The PubMed database was systematically searched to identify relevant randomized controlled trials. Efficacy outcomes included the modified total Sharp score (mTSS), erosion, joint space narrowing, 70% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR70), Boolean remission, Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) score ≤ 2.8, and Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) score ≤ 3.3. Five studies were identified using the inclusion criteria, and two additional publications presented further results from one of the five studies, with the total meta-analysis population comprising 6933 patients. Among all JAK inhibitors analyzed and the bDMARD adalimumab, filgotinib 200 mg had the highest probability of being the treatment with the greatest improvement in mTSS versus placebo at 48/52 weeks, followed by filgotinib 100 mg, adalimumab 40 mg, baricitinib 4 mg, and upadacitinib 15 mg. Filgotinib 200 mg also had the highest probability of being the treatment with the greatest improvement in erosion and joint space narrowing at 48/52 weeks versus the same comparators. At 12 weeks, filgotinib 200 mg had the highest probability versus other JAK inhibitors and adalimumab of achieving clinical remission (CDAI ≤ 2.8 and SDAI ≤ 3.3). Varying treatments had the highest probability of achieving other efficacy outcomes of interest at 12, 24/26, and 48/52 weeks. In the absence of head-to-head comparisons, this analysis provides valuable evidence for the role of filgotinib in the treatment of patients with MTX-IR RA.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
1.
2.
go back to reference Smolen JS, Landewe RBM, Bergstra SA, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2022 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023;82(1):3–18.CrossRefPubMed Smolen JS, Landewe RBM, Bergstra SA, et al. EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2022 update. Ann Rheum Dis. 2023;82(1):3–18.CrossRefPubMed
3.
go back to reference Fraenkel L, Bathon JM, England BR, et al. 2021 American College of Rheumatology guideline for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021;73(7):924–39.CrossRefPubMed Fraenkel L, Bathon JM, England BR, et al. 2021 American College of Rheumatology guideline for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2021;73(7):924–39.CrossRefPubMed
7.
go back to reference Combe B, Kivitz A, Tanaka Y, et al. Filgotinib versus placebo or adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate: a phase III randomised clinical trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80(7):848–58.CrossRefPubMed Combe B, Kivitz A, Tanaka Y, et al. Filgotinib versus placebo or adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and inadequate response to methotrexate: a phase III randomised clinical trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80(7):848–58.CrossRefPubMed
8.
go back to reference Westhovens R, Rigby WFC, van der Heijde D, et al. Filgotinib in combination with methotrexate or as monotherapy versus methotrexate monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and limited or no prior exposure to methotrexate: the phase 3, randomised controlled FINCH 3 trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80(6):727–38.CrossRefPubMed Westhovens R, Rigby WFC, van der Heijde D, et al. Filgotinib in combination with methotrexate or as monotherapy versus methotrexate monotherapy in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis and limited or no prior exposure to methotrexate: the phase 3, randomised controlled FINCH 3 trial. Ann Rheum Dis. 2021;80(6):727–38.CrossRefPubMed
9.
go back to reference Genovese MC, Kalunian K, Gottenberg JE, et al. Effect of filgotinib vs placebo on clinical response in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis refractory to disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy: the FINCH 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;322(4):315–25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Genovese MC, Kalunian K, Gottenberg JE, et al. Effect of filgotinib vs placebo on clinical response in patients with moderate to severe rheumatoid arthritis refractory to disease-modifying antirheumatic drug therapy: the FINCH 2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2019;322(4):315–25.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
10.
go back to reference Tanaka Y, Kavanaugh A, Wicklund J, et al. Filgotinib, a novel JAK1-preferential inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: an overview from clinical trials. Mod Rheumatol. 2022;32(1):1–11.CrossRefPubMed Tanaka Y, Kavanaugh A, Wicklund J, et al. Filgotinib, a novel JAK1-preferential inhibitor for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: an overview from clinical trials. Mod Rheumatol. 2022;32(1):1–11.CrossRefPubMed
11.
go back to reference Rubbert-Roth A, Enejosa J, Pangan AL, et al. Trial of upadacitinib or abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(16):1511–21.CrossRefPubMed Rubbert-Roth A, Enejosa J, Pangan AL, et al. Trial of upadacitinib or abatacept in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(16):1511–21.CrossRefPubMed
12.
go back to reference Liao X, Huo W, Zeng W, et al. Efficacy and safety of different Janus kinase inhibitors combined with methotrexate for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a single-center randomized trial. Adv Rheumatol. 2023;63(1):50.CrossRefPubMed Liao X, Huo W, Zeng W, et al. Efficacy and safety of different Janus kinase inhibitors combined with methotrexate for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis: a single-center randomized trial. Adv Rheumatol. 2023;63(1):50.CrossRefPubMed
14.
go back to reference Cai W, Tong R, Sun Y, et al. Comparative efficacy of five approved Janus kinase inhibitors as monotherapy and combination therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Pharmacol. 2024;15:1387585.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cai W, Tong R, Sun Y, et al. Comparative efficacy of five approved Janus kinase inhibitors as monotherapy and combination therapy in patients with moderate-to-severe active rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Front Pharmacol. 2024;15:1387585.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
15.
go back to reference Liu L, Yan YD, Shi FH, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors as monotherapy and in combination with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Immunol. 2022;13: 977265.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Liu L, Yan YD, Shi FH, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of JAK inhibitors as monotherapy and in combination with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Immunol. 2022;13: 977265.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
16.
go back to reference Cacciapaglia F, Venerito V, Stano S, et al. Comparison of adalimumab to other targeted therapies in rheumatoid arthritis: results from systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J Pers Med. 2022;12(3):353.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Cacciapaglia F, Venerito V, Stano S, et al. Comparison of adalimumab to other targeted therapies in rheumatoid arthritis: results from systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J Pers Med. 2022;12(3):353.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
17.
go back to reference Lee YH, Song GG. Relative efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib in comparison to adalimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Z Rheumatol. 2020;79(8):785–96.CrossRefPubMed Lee YH, Song GG. Relative efficacy and safety of tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, and filgotinib in comparison to adalimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis. Z Rheumatol. 2020;79(8):785–96.CrossRefPubMed
18.
go back to reference Fleischmann R, Mysler E, Hall S, et al. Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib with methotrexate, and adalimumab with methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (ORAL Strategy): a phase 3b/4, double-blind, head-to-head, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;390(10093):457–68.CrossRefPubMed Fleischmann R, Mysler E, Hall S, et al. Efficacy and safety of tofacitinib monotherapy, tofacitinib with methotrexate, and adalimumab with methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (ORAL Strategy): a phase 3b/4, double-blind, head-to-head, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2017;390(10093):457–68.CrossRefPubMed
19.
go back to reference Taylor PC, Keystone EC, van der Heijde D, et al. Baricitinib versus placebo or adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(7):652–62.CrossRefPubMed Taylor PC, Keystone EC, van der Heijde D, et al. Baricitinib versus placebo or adalimumab in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(7):652–62.CrossRefPubMed
20.
go back to reference Fleischmann R, Pangan AL, Song IH, et al. Upadacitinib versus placebo or adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: results of a phase III, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71(11):1788–800.CrossRefPubMed Fleischmann R, Pangan AL, Song IH, et al. Upadacitinib versus placebo or adalimumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: results of a phase III, double-blind, randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71(11):1788–800.CrossRefPubMed
21.
go back to reference Peterfy CG, Strand V, Friedman A, et al. Inhibition of structural joint damage progression with upadacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis: 1-year outcomes from the SELECT phase 3 program. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022;61(8):3246–56.CrossRefPubMed Peterfy CG, Strand V, Friedman A, et al. Inhibition of structural joint damage progression with upadacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis: 1-year outcomes from the SELECT phase 3 program. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2022;61(8):3246–56.CrossRefPubMed
22.
go back to reference van der Heijde D, Strand V, Tanaka Y, et al. Tofacitinib in combination with methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: clinical efficacy, radiographic, and safety outcomes from a twenty-four-month, phase III study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71(6):878–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral van der Heijde D, Strand V, Tanaka Y, et al. Tofacitinib in combination with methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: clinical efficacy, radiographic, and safety outcomes from a twenty-four-month, phase III study. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019;71(6):878–91.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
23.
go back to reference Han X, Liu X, Zhong F, et al. Comparison of efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies for essential hypertension with anxiety or depression disorder. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(7): e0254699.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Han X, Liu X, Zhong F, et al. Comparison of efficacy and safety of complementary and alternative therapies for essential hypertension with anxiety or depression disorder. PLoS ONE. 2021;16(7): e0254699.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
24.
go back to reference Dias S, Welton NJ, Sutton AJ, et al. NICE DSU technical support document 4: inconsistency in networks of evidence based on randomised controlled trials. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2014. Dias S, Welton NJ, Sutton AJ, et al. NICE DSU technical support document 4: inconsistency in networks of evidence based on randomised controlled trials. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE); 2014.
25.
go back to reference van Vollenhoven RF, Fleischmann R, Cohen S, et al. Tofacitinib or adalimumab versus placebo in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(6):508–19.CrossRefPubMed van Vollenhoven RF, Fleischmann R, Cohen S, et al. Tofacitinib or adalimumab versus placebo in rheumatoid arthritis. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(6):508–19.CrossRefPubMed
26.
go back to reference Fleischmann RM, Genovese MC, Enejosa JV, et al. Safety and effectiveness of upadacitinib or adalimumab plus methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis over 48 weeks with switch to alternate therapy in patients with insufficient response. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(11):1454–62.CrossRefPubMed Fleischmann RM, Genovese MC, Enejosa JV, et al. Safety and effectiveness of upadacitinib or adalimumab plus methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis over 48 weeks with switch to alternate therapy in patients with insufficient response. Ann Rheum Dis. 2019;78(11):1454–62.CrossRefPubMed
27.
go back to reference Tanaka Y, Atsumi T, Aletaha D, et al. Benefit of filgotinib, a JAK1 preferential inhibitor, in rheumatoid arthritis patients with previous rapid radiographic progression: post hoc analysis of two trials. Rheumatol Ther. 2023;10(1):161–85.PubMed Tanaka Y, Atsumi T, Aletaha D, et al. Benefit of filgotinib, a JAK1 preferential inhibitor, in rheumatoid arthritis patients with previous rapid radiographic progression: post hoc analysis of two trials. Rheumatol Ther. 2023;10(1):161–85.PubMed
28.
go back to reference Tanaka Y, Takeuchi T, Atsumi T, et al. Prevention of radiographic progression in higher-risk patients with rheumatoid arthritis using filgotinib in phase III studies: narrative review of post hoc analyses. Rheumatol Ther. 2023;10(6):1399–415.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Tanaka Y, Takeuchi T, Atsumi T, et al. Prevention of radiographic progression in higher-risk patients with rheumatoid arthritis using filgotinib in phase III studies: narrative review of post hoc analyses. Rheumatol Ther. 2023;10(6):1399–415.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
29.
go back to reference Smolen JS, Aletaha D. Scores for all seasons: SDAI and CDAI. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014;32(5 Suppl 85):S-75-9. Smolen JS, Aletaha D. Scores for all seasons: SDAI and CDAI. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014;32(5 Suppl 85):S-75-9.
30.
go back to reference Aletaha D, Smolen J. The Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI): a review of their usefulness and validity in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005;23(5 Suppl 39):S100–8.PubMed Aletaha D, Smolen J. The Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI) and the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI): a review of their usefulness and validity in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2005;23(5 Suppl 39):S100–8.PubMed
31.
go back to reference Qu B, Zhao F, Song Y, et al. The efficacy and safety of different Janus kinase inhibitors as monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(6): e0305621.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral Qu B, Zhao F, Song Y, et al. The efficacy and safety of different Janus kinase inhibitors as monotherapy in rheumatoid arthritis: a Bayesian network meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2024;19(6): e0305621.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentral
32.
go back to reference Lee YH, Song GG. Relative remission rates of Janus kinase inhibitors in comparison with adalimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a network meta-analysis. Z Rheumatol. 2024;83(Suppl 1):88–96.CrossRefPubMed Lee YH, Song GG. Relative remission rates of Janus kinase inhibitors in comparison with adalimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a network meta-analysis. Z Rheumatol. 2024;83(Suppl 1):88–96.CrossRefPubMed
Metadata
Title
Filgotinib Radiographic and Clinical Efficacy Versus Other JAK Inhibitors and Adalimumab in Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis and Inadequate Response to Methotrexate: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis
Authors
Yoshiya Tanaka
Rene Westhovens
Hong Sun
Carole Van der Donckt
Yan Zhong
Toshihiko Kaise
Publication date
10-04-2025
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Rheumatology and Therapy
Print ISSN: 2198-6576
Electronic ISSN: 2198-6584
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40744-025-00757-7

Keynote series | Spotlight on managing health in obesity

Obesity is a major contributor to cardiorenal metabolic disease, but its impact extends throughout the body. Understand how obesity can affect other organ systems and impact treatment, and whether weight-loss measures improve outcomes.

Prof. Eva L. Feldman
Prof. Jonette Keri
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Watch now
Video

Women’s health knowledge hub

Elevate your patient care with our comprehensive, evidence-based medical education on women's health. Designed to help you provide exceptional care for your female patients at every stage of life, we provide expert insights into topics such as reproductive health, menopause, breast cancer and sex-specific health risks and precision medicine.

Read more

Keynote webinar | Spotlight on advances in lupus

  • Live
  • Webinar | 27-05-2025 | 18:00 (CEST)

Systemic lupus erythematosus is a severe autoimmune disease that can cause damage to almost every system of the body. Join this session to learn more about novel biomarkers for diagnosis and monitoring and familiarise yourself with current and emerging targeted therapies.

Join us live: Tuesday 27th May, 18:00-19:15 (CEST)

Prof. Edward Vital
Prof. Ronald F. van Vollenhoven
Developed by: Springer Medicine
Register now
Webinar