Skip to main content
Top

Open Access 25-09-2024 | Adalimumab | Original Research Article

Patient Satisfaction and Experience with CT-P17 Following Transition from Reference Adalimumab or Another Adalimumab Biosimilar: Results from the Real-World YU-MATTER Study

Authors: Guillaume Bouguen, Laure Gossec, Vered Abitbol, Eric Senbel, Guillaume Bonnaud, Xavier Roblin, Yoram Bouhnik, Stéphane Nancey, Nicolas Mathieu, Jérôme Filippi, Lucine Vuitton, Stéphane Nahon, Azeddine Dellal, Alice Denis, Lucile Foulley, Caroline Habauzit, Salim Benkhalifa, Hubert Marotte

Published in: BioDrugs

Login to get access

Abstract

Background and Objectives

Biosimilars are cost-effective alternatives to reference products for patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) and chronic inflammatory rheumatic diseases (CIRD), but patient beliefs can affect adherence to the transition. This study aimed to explore patient experience and satisfaction after switching to CT-P17, a high-concentration (100 mg/mL), citrate-free adalimumab biosimilar.

Patients and Methods

This observational, multicenter, prospective French study included adult patients with IBD or CIRD who switched to CT-P17 from reference adalimumab (R-ADA; 100 mg/mL) or a low-concentration adalimumab biosimilar (ADA-BioS; 50 mg/mL). Patients completed online questionnaires to assess treatment perceptions, satisfaction, and tolerance at study inclusion (under previous treatment) and over 3 months of CT-P17 treatment. The primary criterion was overall patient satisfaction, which was assessed with the question, “What is your global satisfaction with the CT-P17 injection?”, using a 7-point Likert scale. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with increased treatment satisfaction after switching to CT-P17.

Results

The total analysis population included 232 patients (IBD 72.0%, CIRD 28.0%). Median patient age was 57.0 years (interquartile range [IQR] 46.0–63.0), 50.4% were men, and median disease duration was 9 years (IQR 5–16). Approximately half of the cohort (51.2%) switched to CT-P17 from an ADA-BioS (including 19.4% from an ADA-BioS with citrate) and half (48.7%) from R-ADA. The proportion of patients who were satisfied with treatment was stable between baseline (under previous treatment) and 3 months (under CT-P17). More patients reported increased satisfaction after switching to CT-P17 from an ADA-BioS (22.7% vs 8.0% when switching from R-ADA; p = 0.002), or from an ADA-BioS containing citrate (28.9% vs 12.3% when switching from a citrate-free ADA-BioS; p = 0.008). Independent prognostic factors for increased satisfaction were previous treatment with an ADA-BioS (odds ratio [OR] 2.88 [95% confidence interval 1.17–7.08]; p = 0.021) and pain at the injection site under previous treatment (OR 1.26 [1.08–1.47]; p = 0.004). Significantly fewer patients reported pain, redness, itching, and hematoma after 3 months of CT-P17 treatment versus baseline (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The majority of patients had stable or increased treatment satisfaction after switching from R-ADA or an ADA-BioS to CT-P17. In particular, switching to CT-P17 from a low-concentration ADA-BioS or an ADA-BioS containing citrate was associated with increased patient satisfaction. An improvement in overall tolerance with CT-P17 versus previous adalimumab treatment was also reported.

Trial Registration

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT05427942, registered June 22, 2022.
Appendix
Available only for authorised users
Literature
14.
Metadata
Title
Patient Satisfaction and Experience with CT-P17 Following Transition from Reference Adalimumab or Another Adalimumab Biosimilar: Results from the Real-World YU-MATTER Study
Authors
Guillaume Bouguen
Laure Gossec
Vered Abitbol
Eric Senbel
Guillaume Bonnaud
Xavier Roblin
Yoram Bouhnik
Stéphane Nancey
Nicolas Mathieu
Jérôme Filippi
Lucine Vuitton
Stéphane Nahon
Azeddine Dellal
Alice Denis
Lucile Foulley
Caroline Habauzit
Salim Benkhalifa
Hubert Marotte
Publication date
25-09-2024
Publisher
Springer International Publishing
Published in
BioDrugs
Print ISSN: 1173-8804
Electronic ISSN: 1179-190X
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40259-024-00681-2