Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

Open Access 11-05-2024 | Acne | Review

Comparison of the Efficacy of Clascoterone, Trifarotene, and Tazarotene for the Treatment of Acne: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis

Authors: Mahek Shergill, Muhammad Usman Ali, Mohannad Abu-Hilal

Published in: Dermatology and Therapy | Issue 5/2024

Login to get access

Abstract

Introduction

Acne vulgaris, a chronic inflammatory condition, is associated with significant physical and psychosocial burden. Since 2019, three new topical agents for acne vulgaris have been approved in the USA and Canada. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to compare the efficacy between twice-daily clascoterone cream 1%, once-daily trifarotene 0.005% cream, and once-daily tazarotene 0.045% lotion for acne treatment.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing clascoterone, trifarotene, or tazarotene with vehicle in patients with moderate-to-severe acne were identified from a systematic literature review and included in a meta-analysis. Primary outcomes were percentage reduction in inflammatory and noninflammatory lesion count (ILC and NILC, respectively) and treatment success rate (≥ 2-grade improvement in Investigator’s Global Assessment or Evaluator’s Global Severity Score and a rating of clear or almost clear) at week 12. DerSimonian and Laird random-effects models with the inverse variance method were used to calculate the mean difference (MD) for percentage reduction in ILC and NILC, and odds ratios (ORs) for the rate of treatment success.

Results

Six Phase 3 RCTs were included in the meta-analysis. The analyses showed robust differences favoring the interventions for ILC (MD: − 11.5; 95% confidence interval [CI]: − 14.39, − 8.62), NILC (MD: − 12.25; 95% CI: − 15.21, − 9.29), and treatment success rate (OR: 2.14; 95% CI: 1.81, 2.53). No differences were observed between clascoterone, trifarotene, and tazarotene for ILC (MD: − 12.8, − 11.2, and − 10.1, respectively), NILC (MD: − 11.6, − 13.9, and − 12.8, respectively), or treatment success rate (OR: 2.9, 1.9, and 2.1, respectively (all P > 0.05).

Conclusion

No significant differences in efficacy were observed between clascoterone, trifarotene, and tazarotene after 12 weeks of treatment in patients with moderate-to-severe acne. Differences in application frequency and safety profile should also be taken into consideration when making treatment decisions.
Appendix
This content is only visible if you are logged in and have the appropriate permissions.
Literature
This content is only visible if you are logged in and have the appropriate permissions.
Metadata
Title
Comparison of the Efficacy of Clascoterone, Trifarotene, and Tazarotene for the Treatment of Acne: A Systematic Literature Review and Meta-Analysis
Authors
Mahek Shergill
Muhammad Usman Ali
Mohannad Abu-Hilal
Publication date
11-05-2024
Publisher
Springer Healthcare
Published in
Dermatology and Therapy / Issue 5/2024
Print ISSN: 2193-8210
Electronic ISSN: 2190-9172
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13555-024-01175-3

Innovations in AML: insights and practical guidance

Hear directly from acute myeloid leukemia experts in this vodcast series focussing on innovations in molecular testing, emerging therapies, and targeted treatments, and get practical advice for improving the care of your patients with relapsed or refractory disease.

Supported by:
  • Rigel Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Developed by: Springer Health+ IME
Learn more

ADA 2025

Unlock your free and exclusive access to the latest news from the American Diabetes Association’s 85th Scientific Sessions.

Read more