Skip to main content
Top
Published in:

09-07-2022 | Acetabular Fracture | Original Paper

Immediate full weight bearing after pelvic percutaneous fixation by screw for simple acetabular and pelvic ring fractures in patients older than sixty five years

Authors: Rayane Benhenneda, Hoel Letissier, Frédéric Dubrana, Rémi Di Francia

Published in: International Orthopaedics | Issue 10/2022

Login to get access

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to assess the walking and weight-bearing abilities of patients older than 65 years with a simple acetabular or pelvic ring fracture treated with pelvic percutaneous screwing (PPS).

Methods

This study included 27 patients. This was a retrospective, single-centre observational study conducted in a level 1 trauma centre from September 2019 to April 2021. All patients older than 65 years who underwent PPS for an acetabular or pelvic ring fracture were included.

Results

All patients were able to walk and bear weight at one day after PPS. The mean walking distance increased from 19.4 m the day after the operation to 59.8 m, 497.8 m, and 1402 m at discharge, three and six weeks after the operation, respectively. The average pain visual analog scale scores before and after the operation were 4.1 (range, 3.6–5.1; standard deviation [SD], 0.63) and 0.9 (range, 0.5–1.2; SD, 0.25), respectively (p < .0001). The average daily dose of paracetamol used before and after the operation was 2.2 (range, 1.7–3.1; SD, 0.59) g/d and 1.3 (range, 0.6–1.7; SD, 0.40) g/d, respectively (p = .0232). The average daily dose of morphine used before and after the operation was 5.7 (range, 4.7–6.7; SD, 0.76) mg/d and 1.6 (range, 0.5–2.9; SD, 1.09) mg/d, respectively (p = .0001).

Conclusion

All included patients were able to walk at one day after PPS. PPS was associated with reduced pain as well as a reduction in paracetamol and morphine use.
Literature
3.
go back to reference Judet R, Judet J, Lanzetta A, Letournel E (1968) Fractures of the acetabulum. Classification and guiding rules for open reduction. Arch Ortop 81:119–158PubMed Judet R, Judet J, Lanzetta A, Letournel E (1968) Fractures of the acetabulum. Classification and guiding rules for open reduction. Arch Ortop 81:119–158PubMed
4.
go back to reference Letournel E, Judet R (1993) Fractures of the acetabulum, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin HeidelbergCrossRef Letournel E, Judet R (1993) Fractures of the acetabulum, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin HeidelbergCrossRef
7.
go back to reference Giannoudis PV, Grotz MRW, Papakostidis C, Dinopoulos H (2005) Operative treatment of displaced fractures of the acetabulum. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:2–9CrossRef Giannoudis PV, Grotz MRW, Papakostidis C, Dinopoulos H (2005) Operative treatment of displaced fractures of the acetabulum. A meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:2–9CrossRef
12.
go back to reference Mears DC, Rubash HE, Sawaguchi T (1985) Fractures of the acetabulum. The Hip 95–113 Mears DC, Rubash HE, Sawaguchi T (1985) Fractures of the acetabulum. The Hip 95–113
30.
go back to reference Liebergall M, Mosheiff R, Low J, et al (1999) Acetabular fractures. Clinical outcome of surgical treatment. Clin Orthop 205–216 Liebergall M, Mosheiff R, Low J, et al (1999) Acetabular fractures. Clinical outcome of surgical treatment. Clin Orthop 205–216
Metadata
Title
Immediate full weight bearing after pelvic percutaneous fixation by screw for simple acetabular and pelvic ring fractures in patients older than sixty five years
Authors
Rayane Benhenneda
Hoel Letissier
Frédéric Dubrana
Rémi Di Francia
Publication date
09-07-2022
Publisher
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
Published in
International Orthopaedics / Issue 10/2022
Print ISSN: 0341-2695
Electronic ISSN: 1432-5195
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-022-05504-z